Search Decisions

Decision Text

USMC | DRB | 2002_Marine | MD02-00302
Original file (MD02-00302.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

ex-Pvt, USMCR
Docket No. MD02-00302

Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review, received 020123, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. The applicant requested a documentary record discharge review. The applicant did not designate a representative on the DD Form 293.

Decision

A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 020829. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, NDRB discerned no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the applicant’s service. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the character of the discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain: UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/UNSAT PARTICIPATION IN READY RESERVE, authority: MARCORSEPMAN 6213.

PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION

Issues, as submitted

 1. I believe an error occurs to be unjust in the fact that the discharge was isolated solely on my non-participation due to a family obligation. The family obligation involved the illness and custody dispute with my son, N_ P_. I am a single father who is fully responsible for his well being. I had good standing in the service and grade marks. I was meritoriously promoted in basic training. My composite score does not show any negative comments or remarks. As a result of my non-participation, I was demoted in rank. However, as stated above, I did not receive negative remarks before my dismissal from the military. In addition, my departure from the Marine Corps Reserve, I did not receive my DD Form 214 form. During my time in the Marine Corps, I gave one hundred percent in all activities performed.

2. My "Other Than Honorable" discharge has affected my status as a police officer in the Commonwealth of Kentucky. A qualifying requirement involves those serving or served in the military MUST have an Honorable discharge. I was certified as a police officer in Kentucky before I was discharged from the Marine Corps. I was then forced to resign as a police officer due to document 1 requirements. One reason I would like to see my discharge changed is because it affects my life in terms of career choice and family decisions. I take great pride in serving my community as a police officer. Without a change in my discharge status, I will not be able to serve my community with the talent I have been given.

 Documentation
In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:
Applicant's ltr to Board dtd 15 Nov 01
Newport Police Department Policy/Procedure page
Certificate of Baptism of applicant's son
Under Other Than Honorable Conditions Certificate of Discharge
Certificate of Meritorious Promotion dtd 12 Dec 97
Dept of Army Diploma from Military Police School dtd 27 Mar 98
USMC Diploma from School of Infantry dtd 14 Jan 98
Applicant's Record of Service
Certificate from Dept of Criminal Justice Training (Kentucky Justice Cabinet) dtd
 3 Dec 99
 Certificate from Peace Officer Professional Standards dtd 10 Mar 2000
Certificate from Dept of Criminal Justice Training (Kentucky Justice Cabinet) dtd
 30 Apr 1999
 Certificate of Completion from Dept of Criminal Justice Training (9/29/99 to 10/1/99)
Certificate of Completion from Dept of Criminal Justice Training (11/5/99 to 11/15/99)
Certificate of Completion from Dept of Criminal Justice Training (7/18/00 to 7/21/00)
Certificate of Completion from Dept of Criminal Justice Training (4/7/00 to 4/7/00)
Certificate of Completion from Dept of Criminal Justice Training dtd 28 Dec 96
Certificate of Marine Corps Marathon dtd 22 Oct 00
Letter of Recommendation from Sgt. C_ G. C_, Newport Police Department dtd 9 Jan 01
Letter of Short-Term Employment from Sgt. M_ B_ dtd 20 Dec 01

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Active: None
         Inactive: None

 Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 970627               Date of Discharge: 000508

 Length of Service (years, months, days):

         Active: 00 06 14
         Inactive: 02 03 28

 Age at Entry: 25                          Years Contracted: 8

 Education Level: 12                        AFQT: 36

 Highest Rank: PFC

 Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):

 Proficiency: 3.3 (5)              Conduct: 3.6 (5)

 Military Decorations: None

 Unit/Campaign/Service Awards: Pistol Marksman, Rifle Marksman

 Days of Unauthorized Absence: None

 Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):

UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/UNSAT PARTICIPATION IN READY RESERVE; authority: MARCORSEPMAN 6213.

 Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

970915:  Enlistment contract into the USMCR documented acknowledgement of the requirement to participate in 48 scheduled drills and not less than 14 days of annual training per year for 6 years upon completion of initial active duty training.

970915:  Commenced Initial Active Duty for Training (IADT).

980328:  Released from IADT, having completed 6 months, 14 days of training and received a characterization of service as "honorable."

980913:  Counseled for deficiencies in performance and conduct [unsatisfactory participation]. Necessary corrective actions explained, sources of assistance provided, disciplinary and discharge warning issued. [NOT AVAILABLE FOR SIGNATURE.]

981003:  Administratively reduced to rank of Private for unsatisfactory participation in the Marine Corps Reserve.

981004:  Counseled for deficiencies in performance and conduct [unsatisfactory participation]. Necessary corrective actions explained, sources of assistance provided, disciplinary and discharge warning issued. [NOT AVAILABLE FOR SIGNATURE.]

990117:  Counseled for deficiencies in performance and conduct [unsatisfactory participation]. Necessary corrective actions explained, sources of assistance provided, disciplinary and discharge warning issued. [NOT AVAILABLE FOR SIGNATURE.]
990411:  Counseled for deficiencies in performance and conduct [unsatisfactory participation]. Necessary corrective actions explained, sources of assistance provided, disciplinary and discharge warning issued. [NOT AVAILABLE FOR SIGNATURE.]

990516:  Counseled for deficiencies in performance and conduct [unsatisfactory participation]. Necessary corrective actions explained, sources of assistance provided, disciplinary and discharge warning issued. [NOT AVAILABLE FOR SIGNATURE.]

990516:  Letter of intent to administratively separate under other than honorable conditions for the failure to participate in reserve training was sent via certified mail, return receipt requested. Applicant receipted for letter by return signature but failed to acknowledge the contents. The failure to acknowledge official certified mail constitutes acknowledgement and waiver of all rights (MARCORSEPMAN, par. 6303).
990606:  Counseled for deficiencies in performance and conduct [unsatisfactory participation]. Necessary corrective actions explained, sources of assistance provided, disciplinary and discharge warning issued. [NOT AVAILABLE FOR SIGNATURE.]

990711:  Counseled for deficiencies in performance and conduct [unsatisfactory participation]. Necessary corrective actions explained, sources of assistance provided, disciplinary and discharge warning issued. [NOT AVAILABLE FOR SIGNATURE.]

990808:  Counseled for deficiencies in performance and conduct [unsatisfactory participation]. Necessary corrective actions explained, sources of assistance provided, disciplinary and discharge warning issued. [NOT AVAILABLE FOR SIGNATURE.]

990911:  Commanding Officer recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to unsatisfactory participation in the Ready Reserve. The factual basis for this recommendation was due to member's accumulation of an excessive number of unexcused absences from regularly scheduled drills.

990912:  Counseled for deficiencies in performance and conduct [unsatisfactory participation]. Necessary corrective actions explained, sources of assistance provided, disciplinary and discharge warning issued. [NOT AVAILABLE FOR SIGNATURE.]
991230:  Resubmission of administrative discharge by reason of unsatisfactory participation in the Marine Corps Reserve due to original being lost in the mail.

000320:  GCMCA [Commander, Marine Forces Reserve] directed the applicant's discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to failure to participate in the Ready Reserve.

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW

Discussion

The applicant was discharged on 000508 under other than honorable conditions for misconduct due to unsatisfactory participation in the Ready Reserve (A, B, and C). The Board presumed regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs (D). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (E and F).

Issue 1. The applicant’s average proficiency and conduct markings, and composite score are not sufficient to mitigate his misconduct which consisted of his failure to participate in his reserve unit drills. While he may feel that his responsibilities as a single father were factors that contributed to his actions, the record is devoid of evidence that the applicant was not responsible for his conduct or that he should not be held accountable for his actions. The applicant received numerous page 11’s for his unexcused absences and waived his right to contest his involuntary separation. Relief denied.

Issue 2. The Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the purpose of enhancing employment opportunities as requested in the issue. The Board’s charter limits its review to a determination on the propriety and equity of the discharge. In the applicant’s case the Board could discern no impropriety or inequity and therefore considered the applicant’s discharge was proper and equitable. The applicant’s discharge characterization accurately reflects his service to his country. Normally, to permit relief, an error or injustice must have existed during the period of enlistment in question. No such error or injustice occurred during the applicant’s enlistment. Additionally, there is no law, or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time, or good conduct in civilian life, subsequent to leaving the service. Relief not warranted.

The applicant is reminded that he remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received, at the NDRB, within 15 years from the date of his discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required.



Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)

 A. Paragraph 6213 of the Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, (MCO P1900.16E), effective 18 Aug 95.

B. Marine Corps Reserve Administrative Management Manual, MCO P1001R.1, Chapter 3, Reserve Participation and Administrative Procedures, paragraph 300.

C. Table 61 of the Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, (MCO P1900.16E), effective 18 Aug 95, Guide for Characterization of Service.

D. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 2, AUTHORITY/POLICY FOR DEPARTMENTAL DISCHARGE REVIEW.

E. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.2, PROPRIETY OF THE DISCHARGE.

F. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.3, EQUITY OF THE DISCHARGE.

PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ afls14.jag.af.mil ”.

The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                  Naval Council of Personnel Boards
                  Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                  720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                  Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023      


Similar Decisions

  • USMC | DRB | 2001_Marine | MD01-00561

    Original file (MD01-00561.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    980527: GCMCA, Commander, Marine Forces Reserve, directed the applicant's discharge under conditions other than honorable by reason of misconduct due to unsatisfactory participation in the Ready Reserve. Relief denied.The applicant’s second issue states: “My service was good standing.” The Board determined this issue has no merit. He was properly counseled and notified of impending disciplinary actions and finally discharged.

  • USMC | DRB | 2000_Marine | MD00-00921

    Original file (MD00-00921.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION Relief is denied.The Board disagrees with the applicant’s statement in issue 3 that “My discharge was inproper(sic) because my unit did not want to help me, infact waited till they dropped my rank to Pvt then they discharged me.” As stated in issue 1, the applicant’s service record clearly indicates that the chain of command was attempting to assist the applicant and have him return to a good drilling status, but the applicant refused to attend...

  • USMC | DRB | 2003_Marine | MD03-00021

    Original file (MD03-00021.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD03-00021 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 20020925, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. While the Board commends the Applicant for the positive accomplishments he has made since his discharge, the Applicant’s evidence of post-service conduct was found not to mitigate the offense for which he was discharged. Marine Corps Reserve Administrative Management Manual, MCO P1001R.1, Chapter 3, Reserve...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004 Marine | MD04-00757

    Original file (MD04-00757.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable or general/under honorable conditions. PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION As of this time, the Applicant has not provided sufficient documentation for the Board to consider.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004 Marine | MD04-00166

    Original file (MD04-00166.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD04-00166 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20031030. Conduct: None found in record. Necessary corrective actions explained, sources of assistance provided, disciplinary and discharge warning issued.000719: Commanding officer notified the Applicant of unsatisfactory drill participation via certified letter.000719: Letter of intent to administratively separate under other than honorable conditions for the failure to participate in reserve training was...

  • USMC | DRB | 2001_Marine | MD01-00937

    Original file (MD01-00937.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (E and F).Issue 1 states: “I believe my discharge was undeserved since it was based entirely on one mistake made during an otherwise honorably served tour.” The NDRB finds the applicant’s issue without merit. The applicant missed 70 reserve drills. The applicant did not provide any of these documents.

  • USMC | DRB | 2002_Marine | MD02-00664

    Original file (MD02-00664.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION I do promise that the unacceptable behavior conducted previously will never take place again.Respectfully, Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Applicant's DD Form 214 One page from Applicant's service recordJob reference dated March 21, 2002 PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Active:...

  • USMC | DRB | 2002_Marine | MD02-00413

    Original file (MD02-00413.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD02-00413 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 020214, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION Applicant not available for signature.001109: Commanding Officer notified the Applicant of unsatisfactory drill participation via certified letter.001203: Counseled for deficiencies in performance and conduct.

  • USMC | DRB | 2001_Marine | MD01-00915

    Original file (MD01-00915.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    I am requesting that a change be made to the characterization of my discharge due to the fact that I left my unit in the face of injustice. 970606: Letter of intent to administratively separate under other than honorable conditions for the failure to participate in reserve training was sent via certified mail, return receipt requested. The Board found no evidence of racism against the applicant in a review of his service records.

  • USMC | DRB | 2003_Marine | MD03-01381

    Original file (MD03-01381.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION 961011: Commanding Officer notified the Applicant of unsatisfactory drill participation via certified letter.961103: Counseled for deficiencies in performance and conduct [unsatisfactory participation in reserve, specifically failure to attend regular scheduled drills on 961102 and 961103].