Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-00960
Original file (ND01-00960.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT




ex-OSSA, USN
Docket No. ND01-00960

Applicant’s Request

The application for discharge review, received 010717, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. The applicant requested a documentary record discharge review. The applicant listed American Legion as his representative on the DD Form 293.


Decision

A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 020130. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, NDRB discerned no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the applicant’s service. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the character of the discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain: GENERAL (UNDER HONORABLE CONDITIONS)/PATTERN OF MISCONDUCT, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 1910-140 (formerly 3630600).


PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION

Issues

1. (Equity Issue) His violation of the UCMJ notwithstanding, this former member opines that his overall service record is sufficient to an honorable discharge.

2. (Equity Issue) This former member further requests that the Board include provision of SECNAVINST 5420.174C, enclosure (1), Chapter 9, as it pertains to post-service conduct, in assessing the merits of this application.

Documentation

In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:

Copy of DD Form 214


PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):

         Active: USN                        None
         Inactive: USNR (DEP)     950619 - 951106  COG

Period of Service Under Review :

Date of Enlistment: 951107               Date of Discharge: 980528

Length of Service (years, months, days):

         Active: 02 06 22
         Inactive: None

Age at Entry: 20                          Years Contracted: 4

Education Level: 12                        AFQT: 61

Highest Rate: OSSN

Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):

Performance: 2.83 (6)    Behavior: 2.00 (6)                OTA: 2.77 (5.0 Evals)

Military Decorations: None

Unit/Campaign/Service Awards: NDSM, SSDR

Days of Unauthorized Absence: None

Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):

GENERAL UNDER HONORABLE CONDITIONS/PATTERN OF MISCONDUCT, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 1910-140 (formerly 3630600).

Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

960815:  Retention Warning: Advised of deficiency (Article 86:Unauthorized absence), notified of corrective actions and assistance available, advised of consequences of further deficiencies, and issued discharge warning.

971018:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 86: Absence without authority.
         Award: Forfeiture of $250.00 pay per month for 1 month, restriction for 30 days (suspended for 6 months), extra duty for 30 days (20 days suspended for 6 months), reduction to E-2 (suspended for 6 months). No indication of appeal in the record.

971208:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 121: Larceny and wrongful appropriation.

Award: Restriction and extra duty for 45 days. No indication of appeal in the record.

971208:  Punishment of reduction in rate to E-2 suspended at CO's NJP of 971018 vacated due to continued misconduct.

980519:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 92: Failure to obey order or regulation.

Award: Forfeiture of $519.00 per month for 2 months, restriction and extra duty for 45 days. No indication of appeal in the record.

980526:  Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge general under honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct as evidenced by the awarding of CO's NJP on three occasions within your current enlistment.

980527:          Applicant advised of his rights and having elected not to consult with counsel certified under UCMJ Article 27B, elected to waive all rights.

980623:  Commanding officer recommended discharge general under honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct.


PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW

Discussion

The applicant was discharged on 980528 general under honorable conditions for misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct (A). The Board presumed regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs (B). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).

Issue 1. The Board found that the applicant’s service record was not sufficient to warrant an honorable discharge. Less
than honorable conditions is warranted when negative aspects of a member's conduct or performance of duty outweigh the positive aspects of the member's military record. T he applicant’s service was marred by award of nonjudicial punishment (NJP) for offenses triable by court-martial on three occasions and an adverse counseling entry on another occasion. The applicant’s conduct, which forms the primary basis for determining the character of his service, reflects his willful disobedience of the orders and directives which regulate good order and discipline in naval service, and falls short of that required for an honorable characterization of service. An upgrade to honorable would be inappropriate. Relief denied.

Issue 2.
The applicant’s discharge characterization accurately reflects his service to his country. The discharge was proper and equitable. Normally, to permit relief, an error or injustice must have existed during the period of enlistment in question. No such error or injustice occurred during the applicant’s enlistment. Additionally, there is no law, or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time, or good conduct in civilian life, subsequent to leaving the service. However, the NDRB is authorized to consider outstanding post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge, to the extent that such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Verifiable proof of any post-service accomplishments must be provided in order for the applicant to claim post-service conduct and behavior as a reason to upgrade a less than Honorable discharge. Evidence of continuing educational pursuits, an employment record, documentation of community service, certification of non-involvement with civil authorities and proof of his not using drugs, are examples of verifiable documents that should have been provided to receive consideration for relief, based on post-service conduct. The applicant did not provide sufficient documentation to warrant an upgrade to his discharge. He is reminded that he remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received, at the NDRB, within 15 years from the date of his discharge. The applicant can provide additional documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments at that time. Legal representation at a personal appearance hearing is highly recommended but not required. Relief denied.


Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)

A. Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 18, effective
12 Dec 1997 until Present, Article 1910-140 (formerly 3630600), SEPARATION BY REASON OF MISCONDUCT - PATTERN OF MISCONDUCT.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 2, AUTHORITY/POLICY FOR DEPARTMENTAL DISCHARGE REVIEW.

C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.2, PROPRIETY OF THE DISCHARGE.

D. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.3, EQUITY OF THE DISCHARGE.



PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT


If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at afls10.jag.af.mil ”.

The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                  Naval Council of Personnel Boards
                  Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                  720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                  Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023      



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-00613

    Original file (ND01-00613.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:Copy of DD Form 214 Letter from applicant's parents Letter from applicant's mother Letter from applicant to parents Letter from doctor dated September 21, 2000 Forty-one pages from medical records Letter from commanding officer to applicant's parents dated April 24, 2000 Letter from psychologist, undated Comments from the American Legion dated September 21, 2001...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-00870

    Original file (ND04-00870.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. The Applicant’s misconduct is clearly documented. The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received, at the NDRB, within 15 years from the date of discharge.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-00832

    Original file (ND01-00832.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requested a documentary record discharge review. Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:Copy of DD Form 214 PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Active: None Inactive: USNR (DEP) 970324 - 970819 COG Period of Service Under Review :Date of Enlistment: 970820 Date of Discharge: 000929 Length of Service (years, months, days):Active:...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-00866

    Original file (ND03-00866.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. (Equity Issue) This former member requests that the Board include provisions of SECNAVINST 5420.174C, enclosure (1), Chapter 9, as it pertains to post-service conduct, in assessing the merits of this application.” Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Statement from Applicant,...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-01173

    Original file (ND03-01173.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEWDECISIONAL DOCUMENTex-BMSA, USN Docket No. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. “I BELIEVE I WAS NOT GIVEN THE PROPER ADVISE ABOUT MY CASE BY MY COMMAND.” Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Copy of DD Form 214 (Member’s 4 & 1) PART II - SUMMARY...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00970

    Original file (ND00-00970.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    No indication of appeal in the record.970806: Retention Warning: Advised of deficiency (Disrespectful in language toward a petty officer; and communicating threats. No indication of appeal in the record.980929: Vacate suspended forfeiture of $400.00 for 1 month, extra duty for 15 days and reduction to MS3 awarded at CO's NJP of 4Aug98 due to continued misconduct.980929: NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 89 (2 specs): Disrespect towards a superior commissioned officer, violation of UCMJ,...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-01057

    Original file (ND00-01057.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:Copy of DD Form 214 PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Active: None Inactive: USNR (DEP) 970930 - 980615 COG Period of Service Under Review :Date of Enlistment: 980616 Date of Discharge: 990905 Length of Service (years, months, days):Active: 01 02 20 Inactive: None to wit: wrongfully having personal gear...

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-00720

    Original file (ND99-00720.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND99-00720 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 990503, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).Responding to the applicant’s issue, the Board found nothing in the records, nor did the applicant provide anything to indicate or to show...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-01022

    Original file (ND01-01022.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND01-01022 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 010802, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. (Equity Issue) This former member requests that the Board include provisions of SECNAVINST 5420.174C, enclosure (1), Chapter 9, as it pertains to post-service conduct, in assessing the merits of this application. The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-00073

    Original file (ND02-00073.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).The NDRB notified the applicant in a letter dated 020220 that the discharge package was not available, and advised the applicant that his case would be held for thirty days to allow him to provide discharge documentation. The applicant did not provide the Board with discharge documentation or post service...