Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-00527
Original file (ND01-00527.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

ex-DCFA, USN
Docket No. ND01-00527

Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review, received 010315, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable and his re-enlistment code upgraded from an Re-Code-4 to a re-enlistment codes so he may re-enlist. The applicant requested a documentary record discharge review. The applicant did not list any representative on the DD Form 293.

Decision

A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 010928. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, NDRB discerned no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the applicant’s service. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the character of the discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain: GENERAL (UNDER HONORABLE CONDITIONS)/MISCONDUCT, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 3630600.


PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION

Issues (verbatim)

1. I (applicant) respectfully request that My reenlistment code be upgraded from an RE-4 to a re-enlistable RE Code so I may be re-enlist into the United States NAVY. I feel that I was an out standing Damage Controlman; a hard worker and a loyal servant to the U.S. NAVY. I popped positive for meth amphetemines in April of 1996. I as well as witnesses and the support of my leading petty officer, Chief Petty Officer Division Officer (LT), and Chief Engineer (LCDR) foot tooth and nail to prove to the CAPT on board USS Bunker Hill (SG-52) that I neither willingly nor knowingly took in any substance, that would cause me to come up positive on a urinalysis. I feel I was made an example out of. I've been trying for the last 4+ years to re-enlist. Doors have constantly been closed in my face. I've written to my congressman as well as my senator (Sen. C_ D_ C.T.) (Cong M C.T.) They're offices in turn contacted me and lead me to this office. If there is any thing you can do or any info you can give me to help my cause Please contact me. Respectfully

 Documentation
In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:
Copy of DD Form 214
Copy of Enlisted Performance Evaluation Reports dated 93Jul26 to 95Jan31 and 95Feb01 to 96Jan 15
Copy of General Discharge Certificate dated August 7, 1996

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Active: None
         Inactive: USNR (DEP)     930204 - 930725  COG

 Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 930726               Date of Discharge: 960807

 Length of Service (years, months, days):

         Active: 03 00 12
         Inactive: None

 Age at Entry: 18                          Years Contracted: 4

 Education Level: 12                        AFQT: 47

 Highest Rate: DCFN

 Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):

 Performance: 3.60 (1)    Behavior: 3.80 (1)                OTA: 3.80       4.0 eval
 Performance: 4.00 (1)    Behavior: 3.00 (1)                OTA: 3.50       5.0 eval

 Military Decorations: None

 Unit/Campaign/Service Awards: NDSM, SSDR (2), SASM, BER (2)

 Days of Unauthorized Absence: None

 Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):

GENERAL (UNDER HONORABLE CONDITIONS)/MISCONDUCT, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 3630600.

 Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

950131:  Counseling: Advised of deficiency (performance), notified of corrective actions and assistance available.

950915:  Counseling: Advised of deficiency (personal behavior. adverse), notified of corrective actions and assistance available.

960212:  Counseling: Advised of deficiency (Applicant was late arriving on station for flight quarters. Applicant was sleeping in his rack.), notified of corrective actions and assistance available.

960228:  Counseling: Advised of deficiency (responsibilities), notified of corrective actions and assistance available.

960403:  NAVDRUGLAB, San Diego, CA reports applicant's urine sample, received 960325, tested positive for amphetamines/methamphetamine.
960412:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 112A: Wrongful use, possession of a controlled substance on 7Mar96.
         Award: Forfeiture of $490 per month for 2 months, restriction and extra duty for 45 days, reduction to DCFA. No indication of appeal in the record.
960412:  Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to the commission of a serious offense and misconduct due to drug abuse.
960412:  Applicant advised of his rights and having consulted with counsel certified under UCMJ Article 27B, elected to appear before an Administrative Discharge Board.
960426:  An Administrative Discharge Board, based upon a preponderance of the evidence and by unanimous vote, found that the applicant had committed drug abuse and a serious offense, that the misconduct warranted separation, and recommended discharge general (under honorable conditions).
960502:  Commanding officer recommended discharge general (under honorable conditions) by reason of misconduct due to the drug abuse and misconduct due to commission of a serious offense.

960515:  Drug and Alcohol Abuse Report: Amphetamines possession, shipboard. Unit sweep urinalysis March 7, 1996. Commanding officer recommended separate not via VA hospital. Comments: DCFN (applicant) is an average performer. He does not possess potential further Naval service and is being processed for separation.

960502:  Commanding officer recommended discharge general (under honorable conditions) by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse (use) and misconduct due to commission of a serious offense.

960703:  BUPERS directed the applicant's discharge general (under honorable conditions) by reason of misconduct due to the commission of a serious offense.

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT
REGULATION/LAW

Discussion

The applicant was discharged on 960807 general (under honorable conditions) for misconduct due to commission of a serious offense (A and B). The Board presumed regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs (C). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (D and E).

In response to the applicant’s issue 1, the Board determined that the applicant tested positive for amphetamines/methamphetamines and was properly disciplined and discharged. The Navy’s ‘zero tolerance’ policy for the use of illegal drugs was in effect at the time that the applicant committed his misconduct and remains in effect today. The Board determined the discharge was proper and equitable. Relief denied.

Additionally, the applicant requests that his re-enlistment code be changed from RE-4 to a code that will allow him the opportunity to re-enlist into the military. The NDRB has no authority to change reenlistment codes or make recommendations to permit reentry into the naval service or any other branch of the Armed Forces. The NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy or Marine Corps. Reenlistment policy of the Naval service is promulgated by the Commander Navy Personnel, Pers-814, 5720 Integrity Drive, Millington, TN 38055, and the Commandant, United States Marine Corps, Code MMPE5, Washington, DC 20380-3001. A request for a waiver is normally done only during the processing of a formal application for enlistment through a recruiter. Relief denied.

 The following is provided for the benefit of the applicant. Normally, to permit relief, an error or injustice must have existed during the period of enlistment in question. No such error or injustice occurred during the applicant’s enlistment. Additionally, there is no law, or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time, or good conduct in civilian life, subsequent to leaving the service. However, the NDRB is authorized to consider outstanding post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge, to the extent that such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Verifiable proof of any post-service accomplishments must be provided in order for the applicant to claim post-service conduct and behavior as a reason to upgrade a less than Honorable discharge. Evidence of continuing educational pursuits, an employment record, documentation of community service, certification of non-involvement with civil authorities and proof of his not using drugs, are examples of verifiable documents that should have been provided to receive consideration for clemency, based on post-service conduct. The applicant did not provide any of these documents. He is reminded that he remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received, at the NDRB, within 15 years from the date of his discharge. The applicant can provide additional documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments at that time. Legal representation at a personal appearance hearing is highly recommended but not required.

Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)

 A. Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 9, effective
22 Jul 94 until 02 Oct 96, Article 3630600, SEPARATION OF ENLISTED PERSONNEL BY REASON OF MISCONDUCT – COMMISSION OF A SERIOUS OFFENSE.

 B. Under the Manual for Courts-Martial, a punitive discharge is authorized for violation of the Uniform Code of Military Justice, Article 112a, for wrongful use, possession of a controlled substance, if adjudged at a Special or General Court-Martial.
C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 2, AUTHORITY/POLICY FOR DEPARTMENTAL DISCHARGE REVIEW.

D. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.2, PROPRIETY OF THE DISCHARGE.

E. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.3, EQUITY OF THE DISCHARGE.

PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at " afls10.jag.af.mil ".

The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                  Naval Council of Personnel Boards
                  Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                  720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                  Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023      


Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-01075

    Original file (ND01-01075.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    While I was in the military I received two good conducts and two honorable discharge. Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:Copy of DD Form 214 PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Active: USN 880817 - 920813 HON USN 920814 - 960523 HON Inactive: USNR (DEP) 880815 - 880816 COG Period of Service Under Review :Date of Enlistment: 960524 Date of...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00734

    Original file (ND00-00734.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    920711: BUPERS directed the applicant's discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to the commission of a serious offense. 920811: BUPERS directed the applicant's discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to the commission of a serious offense. I have sought counseling and am now in control of my problem.” The NDRB found, contrary to the applicant’s issue, the applicant was afforded counseling for his abuses of alcohol, and...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-00019

    Original file (ND04-00019.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. The Applicant requests a documentary record discharge review. Concerning reenlistment, the NDRB has no authority to change reenlistment codes or make recommendations to permit reentry into the naval service or any other of the Armed Forces.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00839

    Original file (ND00-00839.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (D and E).In response to the applicant’s issue, the Board found that the applicant has a history of substance abuse, alcohol abuse and a problem with authority. Even though the applicant’s performance evaluation averages were good, the applicant did commit a serious offense by violating UCMJ Article 91 for disrespect toward a...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-01019

    Original file (ND01-01019.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND01-01019 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 010731, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:None PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Active: USN None Inactive: USNR (DEP) 890225 - 890821 COG Period...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-00836

    Original file (ND03-00836.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to general/ under honorable conditions. Member has low potential for further naval service.900116: Commanding Officer recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to the commission of a serious offense. For the Applicant’s information, he may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) for a change to his records if he believes that...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00865

    Original file (ND00-00865.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Immaturely during my idle time waiting for the next flight, I decided to have some beers and ended up at a party where I did not know the others or their habits. When I arrived at the USS Sacramento I spent several months in the Technical Library, teaching myself about the equipment that was on board my ship, in my division that I was going to be responsible for and the maintenance procedures required to keep such equipment in top operating condition. The Board noted two NJP’s in the...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-00870

    Original file (ND02-00870.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The discharge shall remain: UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/Misconduct – commission of a serious offense, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 3630600. Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Three pages from service record Applicant's DD Form 214 PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Inactive: None Active: None Period of Service Under Review...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-00164

    Original file (ND03-00164.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND03-00164 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 20021106, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service was discovered by the NDRB. Please consider my service record in good standing and change my discharge from other than honorable to...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-00243

    Original file (ND04-00243.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    I love my country and would gladly serve again if I could. I strongly recommend that he be discharged from the Navy and that the characterization of his discharge be other than honorable.900105: CNMPC directed the Applicant's discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse (use). The Applicant’s conduct, which forms the primary basis for determining the character of his service, reflects his willful failure to meet the requirements of his contract...