Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-00267
Original file (ND01-00267.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT


ex-OSSN, USN
Docket No. ND01-00267

Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review, received 010108, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. The applicant requested a documentary record discharge review. The applicant did not list any representative on the DD Form 293.

Decision

A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 010601. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, NDRB discerned no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the applicant’s service. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the character of the discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain: GENERAL (UNDER HONORABLE CONDITIONS)/MISCONDUCT, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 3630600.



PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION


Issues

Prior to the documentary discharge review, the applicant introduced no issues as block 8 on the DD Form 293 is blank.

Documentation
In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:
Statement from applicant
Copy of DD Form 214

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Active: None
          Inactive: USNR (DEP)     930429 - 931102  COG

 Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 931103               Date of Discharge: 960626

 Length of Service (years, months, days):
         Active: 02 07 24
          Inactive: None
Age at Entry: 18                          Years Contracted: 4

 Education Level: 12                        AFQT: 53
Highest Rate: OSSN

 Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):
Performance: 3.40 (1)    Behavior: 3.40 (1)                OTA: 3.40        4.0 eval
 Performance: 2.00 (1)    Behavior: 1.00 (1)                OTA: 1.83        5.0 eval

 Military Decorations: None
Unit/Campaign/Service Awards: NDSM, SSDR, SASM with Bronze Star

 Days of Unauthorized Absence: None
Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):

GENERAL (UNDER HONORABLE CONDITIONS)/MISCONDUCT, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 3630600.
Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

950927:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 86 (7 specs): (1) Unauthorized absence from unit at 0700-1530, 30Jun95, (2) Unauthorized absence from unit at 0700-0730, 20Jul95, (3) Unauthorized absence from unit at 0700-0915, 24Jul95, (4) Unauthorized absence from unit at 0700-0740, 3Aug95, (5) Unauthorized absence from unit at 0700-0715, 4Aug95, (6) Unauthorized absence from unit at 1030, 21Aug95 to 0700, 22Aug95, (7) Failure to go to appointed place of duty at 0600, 29Aug95, violation of UCMJ Article 92 (2 specs): (1) Willful dereliction of duty on 7Sep95 by falling asleep on watch, (2) Willful dereliction of duty on 14Sep95 by falling asleep during working hours.
         Award: Forfeiture of $478 per month for 1 month, restriction and extra duty for 00 days, reduction to E-X. No indication of appeal in the record.
950929:  Retention Warning: Advised of deficiency (Unauthorized absence and willful dereliction of duty.), notified of corrective actions and assistance available, advised of consequences of further deficiencies, and issued discharge warning.
        
951019:  Applicant evaluated as a result of self-referral. Diagnosis: Alcohol dependent.

 951213:  Applicant completed Level III treatment.

960117:  Applicant signed aftercare treatment plan.

960317:  Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of alcohol abuse rehabilitation failure, misconduct due to the commission of a serious offense and misconduct due minor disciplinary infractions.
960319:          Applicant advised of his rights and having elected not to consult with counsel certified under UCMJ Article 27B, elected to waive all rights except the right to obtain copies of the documents used to support the basis for the separation.
960323:  Applicant considered to be a rehab failure due to failure to follow formal aftercare.
960515:  Commanding officer recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of convenience of the government due to alcohol rehabilitation failure, misconduct due to the commission of a serious offense and misconduct due to minor disciplinary infractions. Commanding officer’s comments (verbatim): OSSN (applicant) received Level III treatment in December 1995. At the time of his completion, his aftercare regimen was clearly explained to him and he was informed that deviation could result in administrative separation. Despite the efforts of members of his chain of command and the Command DAPA and CAAC, OSSN (applicant) failed to attend scheduled meetings. In view of his past record of performance and the above, he does not have potential for continued productive Naval service. Accordingly, it is strongly recommended that he be separated from the Naval service with a General Discharge under Honorable conditions.
960611:  BUPERS directed the applicant's discharge general (under honorable conditions) by reason of misconduct due to the commission of a serious offense.

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT
REGULATION/LAW

Discussion

The applicant was discharged on 960626 general (under honorable conditions) for misconduct due to commission of a serious offense (A and B). The Board presumed regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs (C). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (D and E).
The applicant introduced no decisional issues for consideration by the Board.
There is no law or regulation that provides for the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge based solely on the passage of time or good conduct in the civilian life subsequent to leaving the Service. However, the Board is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge (E). Those factors include, but are not limited to, the following: evidence of continuing educational pursuits (transcripts, diplomas, degrees, vocational-technical certificates), a verifiable employment record (Letter of Recommendation from boss), documentation of community service (letter from the activity/community group), certification of non-involvement with civil authorities (police records check) and proof of his not using alcohol (detoxification certificate, AA meeting attendance or letter documenting participation in the program) in order for consideration for clemency based on post-service conduct. The applicant has not provided any documentation of good character and conduct. Therefore no relief will be granted at this time. NDRB experience has shown that applicants with less than five years sobriety usually have not had sufficient opportunity to demonstrate continuing, positive contributions to society. The applicant is reminded that he remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing provided the application is received within 15 years from the date of discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is highly recommended. The possibility of favorable action in the applicant’s case will increase with the amount of time he maintains an alcohol free lifestyle. Verifiable documentation of such a lifestyle is essential. The applicant is encouraged to continue with his pursuits, remain sober, and apply for a personal appearance hearing prior to 26 June, 2011.

Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)
A. Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 9, effective
22 Jul 94 until 02 Oct 96, Article 3630600, SEPARATION OF ENLISTED PERSONNEL BY REASON OF MISCONDUCT – COMMISSION OF A SERIOUS OFFENSE.
B. Under the Manual for Courts-Martial, a punitive discharge is authorized for violation of the Uniform Code of Military Justice, Article 92, for willful dereliction of duty, if adjudged at a Special or General Court-Martial.
C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 2, AUTHORITY/POLICY FOR DEPARTMENTAL DISCHARGE REVIEW.

D. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.2, PROPRIETY OF THE DISCHARGE.

E. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.3, EQUITY OF THE DISCHARGE.

PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at " afls14.jag.af.mil ".

 The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                  Naval Council of Personnel Boards
                  Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                   720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                   Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023      


Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-01112

    Original file (ND99-01112.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    940919: Applicant admitted to Level III ARC Norfolk, VA.941014: Applicant completed treatment with minimal program compliance and issued discharge warning.950515: NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 86: Unauthorized absence from unit 0001, 10Apr95 to 0311, 11Apr95 (1 day). No indication of appeal in the record.950520: Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to the commission of a serious offense and by...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-00937

    Original file (ND02-00937.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant has not been convicted of any civilian charges prior to this administrative separation processing.010131: Vacate suspended forfeiture awarded at CO's NJP dated 001208 due to continued misconduct. At this time, the applicant has not provided such documentation for the Board to consider. The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:Naval Council of Personnel Boards Attn:...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-00593

    Original file (ND03-00593.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    920224: Drug and Alcohol Evaluation: Applicant found dependent on alcohol based on a medical evaluation following Level III treatment in November 1991.920319: Civil Conviction: Duvall County Court for violation of driving under the influence on 920318.Sentence: Fined $452.50, probation for 6 months, revoked license for 6 months, community service for 50 hours, DUI school and victim impact panel.920406: NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 86: Unauthorized absence from 0700-1900, 920319,...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-00578

    Original file (ND01-00578.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Age at Entry: 18 Years Contracted: 4 Education Level: 12 AFQT: 88 Highest Rate: AN Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks): Performance: 3.45 (4) Behavior: 3.40 (4) OTA: 3.40 Military Decorations: None Unit/Campaign/Service Awards: NDSM Days of Unauthorized Absence: 11 Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):GENERAL (UNDER HONORABLE CONDITIONS)/MISCONDUCT, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 3630600. PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-00284

    Original file (ND01-00284.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :930616: Counseling: Advised of deficiency (personal behavior), notified of corrective actions and assistance available.930618: NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 86: Unauthorized absence from 2130, 8Jun93 to 2330, 14Jun93 (6 days/surrendered), violation of UCMJ, Article 87: Missing ship's movement on 9Jun93. No indication of appeal in the record.950808: Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-01508

    Original file (ND03-01508.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND03-01508 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20030917. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. Applicant)(Social security number deleted)” Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Copy of DD Form 214 8 pages from Applicant’s service record PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-00917

    Original file (ND03-00917.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. Decision A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 20040401. The Applicant has not submitted any documentation to mitigate his misconduct while on active duty.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00517

    Original file (ND00-00517.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Member shows no potential for further Naval service.860613: Commanding officer recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason alcohol abuse rehabilitation failure and misconduct due to commission of a serious offense and a pattern of frequent involvement of a discreditable nature with civil or military authorities. Please read supporting documents.” The NDRB reviewed the applicant’s service and medical records and found that she reported to medical the alleged rape in...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-00632

    Original file (ND02-00632.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ’s service record, which included a civil conviction for DUI and two NJP’s for unauthorized absence and drunk and disorderly conduct, the Board discerned there was no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the applicant's service or the assigned reason for discharge at the time of discharge. At this time, the applicant has not provided such documentation for the Board to consider. The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-01187

    Original file (ND02-01187.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    However, since Applicant received only two non-judicial punishments, he did not meet the criteria for discharge by reason of “pattern of misconduct,” as authorized by separation authority. For the Applicant’s edification, Sailors with similar service records normally receive a discharge characterization of under other than honorable conditions. The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by...