Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-00230
Original file (ND01-00230.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

ex-MSSR, USN
Docket No. ND01-00230

Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review, received 001218, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. The applicant requested a personal appearance hearing discharge review before a traveling panel. The applicant listed Veterans of Foreign Wars as his representative on the DD Form 293. In the acknowledgement letter to the applicant, he was informed that the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) does not travel, all hearings are held in the Washington, DC Area. The Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) also advised that the board first conducts a documentary review prior to any personal appearance hearing.

Decision

A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 010817. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, NDRB discerned no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the applicant’s service. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the character of the discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain: UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/Misconduct - Pattern of misconduct, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 3630600.

PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION

Issues

 1. This office, acting as counsel, has reviewed the naval records of the above named applicant and respectfully submits them for consideration in accordance with Department of Defense Directive Number 1332.28 E4.3 EQUITY In the course of a discharge review, it is determined that relief is warranted based upon consideration of the applicant's service record and other evidence presented to the DRB viewed in conjunction with the factors listed in subparagraph and the regulations under which the applicant was discharged, even though the discharge was determined to have been otherwise equitable and proper at the time of issuance. Area of consideration include, but are not limited to: E4.3.1.11 CONVICTIONS BY COURT MARTIAL.

 Documentation
In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:
Power of Attorney Letter from VFW
Copies of DD Form 214 (2)
Resume
Service Related Documents (37pgs)

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Active: USN                        820518 - 860215  HON
         Inactive: USNR (DEP)     820305 - 820517  COG

 Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 860216               Date of Discharge: 871106

 Length of Service (years, months, days):

         Active: 01 08 21
         Inactive: None

 Age at Entry: 36                          Years Contracted: 5

Education Level: 11                        AFQT: 34

 Highest Rate: MS3

 Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):

 Performance: 3.20 (4)    Behavior: 3.05 (4)                OTA: 3.40

 Military Decorations: None

 Unit/Campaign/Service Awards: SSDR (2 ND )

Days of Unauthorized Absence: None

Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):

UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/Misconduct - Pattern of misconduct, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 3630600.

 Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

860216:  Reenlisted onboard USS CARL VINSON (CVN-70) for 5 years.
860314:  Retention Warning from [You committed one or more offenses against the UCMJ, or you have been convicted of (an) offenses (s) by a civil court]. Advised of deficiency (UA, failed to obey lawful order, etc.), notified of corrective actions and assistance available, advised of consequences of further deficiencies, and issued discharge warning.

860314:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 113:Sleeping upon post as a security lookout for pier watch on 860216.
         Award: Forfeiture of $100.00 per month for 1 month (suspended for 6 months), restriction for 10 days, reduction to next inferior pay grade (suspended for 6 months). No indication of appeal in the record.

860612:  Retention Warning from [Naval Station Mare Island, Vallejo, California]: Advised of deficiency (Commanding Officer's NJP on board the USS CARL VINSON 9CVN-70) for sleeping on watch. Additionally, you were counseled regarding disrespectful, argumentative and questioning behavior toward superiors as evidenced by Enlisted Performance Evaluation Report (NAVPERS 1616/24) for the period of 850701 through 860501), notified of corrective actions and assistance available, advised of consequences of further deficiencies, and issued discharge warning.

860923:  Retention Warning from [Naval Station Mare Island, Vallejo, California]: Advised of deficiency ((a) On 860801, based upon the statements of witnesses, you were believed to have been drunk at NADSAP class you were attending. This conclusion is supported by the following facts: (1) You smelled of alcohol; (2) You were argumentative and disruptive of the class; (3) You initiated and argument with a first class petty officer; and (4) Your roommate stated that you consumed over one-half of a bottle of hard liquor the evening of 31 July and morning of 1 August (b) On 860824 you committed the following offenses: (1) You were drunk and disorderly at the Naval Station, Mare Island Barracks. (2) You committed an assault with a deadly weapon upon your roommate by confronting him with a knife and threatening to cut him with that knife), notified of corrective actions and assistance available, advised of consequences of further deficiencies, and issued discharge warning.

870113:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 128: Assault, violation of UCMJ Article 134: (2 Specifications), Disorderly conduct, drunkenness.
         Award: Forfeiture of $50.00 per month for 2 months, extra duty for 30 days, reduction to E-3 (suspended for 6 months). No indication of appeal in the record.

870731:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 89: Disrespect toward a superior commissioned officer on or about 870715, violation of UCMJ Article 91: Insubordinate conduct toward a petty officer on or about 870715.
Award: CCU for 30 days, forfeiture of $400.00 per month for 1 month, reduction to E-3. No indication of appeal in the record.
870818:  Retention Warning from [Naval Station Mare Island, Vallejo, California]: Advised of deficiency (CO's NJP on 870731 for disrespect toward a superior commissioned officer; and disrespect to a superior petty officer), notified of corrective actions and assistance available, advised of consequences of further deficiencies, and issued discharge warning.

871002:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 86: (2 Specifications), Spec 1: UA from 0715, 870909 to 0845, 870909, Spec 2: Failure to go to appointed place of duty, violation of UCMJ Article 134: Drunk and disorderly.
Award: Forfeiture of $369.00 per month for 2 months (1 month suspended), restriction for 15 days, reduction to E-2. No indication of appeal in the record.
871006:  [Naval Station Mare Island, Vallejo, California] notified applicant of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of alcohol rehabilitation failure, misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct and misconduct due to commission of a serious military offense as evidenced by his service record and other document.

871006:          Applicant advised of his rights and having elected not to consult with counsel certified under UCMJ Article 27B, elected to waive all rights except the right to obtain copies of the documents used to support the basis for the separation.

871008:  CAAC evaluation states applicant is an alcohol abuser who appears to be psychologically dependent on alcohol. He has been screened at CAAC, Mare Island on two previous occasions. On 870807, MSSA J____ was screened after being dropped from NADSAP for being drunk and disorderly. He was found dependent on alcohol, but not amenable to a formalized treatment program. On 861112, MSSA J____ was again screened after being disenrolled from CAAC Level II, because of alcohol on his breath, again, he was found psychologically dependent on alcohol and recommended for ARC/S Level III, inpatient treatment program. MSSA J_____ was assigned an aftercare regimen as part of his rehabilitative program and recovery, as outlined in Ref A. He, however, has self-admitted to drinking alcohol while on aftercare; unwilling to continue his antabuse as prescribed by medical and has failed to attend alcoholics anonymous meetings as a local support group. MSSA J____ has not followed his aftercare regimen and is considered a personal rehabilitation failure as outlined in paragraph 6, enclosure 8 of OPNAVINST 5350.4A. He is determined to be not amenable to and ineligible of any other drug or alcohol abuse program intervention due to his misconduct.

871014:  Commanding officer recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of alcohol rehabilitation failure, misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct and misconduct due to commission of a serious military offense as evidenced by his service record and other document.

871020:  Suspended punishment of $369.00 pay per month for 1 month, awarded at CO's NJP of 871002 is hereby vacated due to continued misconduct.

871024:  CNMPC directed the applicant's discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct.

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW

Discussion

The applicant was discharged on 871106 under other than honorable conditions for misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct (A). The Board presumed regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs (B). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).

 The applicant’s record demonstrates a significant pattern of willful disobedience of rules and regulations while on active duty. In one year, and eight months of active service, the applicant had four NJP’s. The record further shows a dedicated effort to counsel and guide the applicant. The applicant’s Other Than Honorable Characterization accurately describes the applicant’s service. Relief is denied.

 The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the re characterization of a discharge. There is no law or regulation which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time, or good conduct in the civilian life subsequent to leaving the service. Normally, to permit relief, an error or injustice must have been found to have existed during the period of enlistment in question. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent that such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, may be considered by the NDRB. The applicant failed to provide documentary evidence to demonstrate his sobriety, positive community service, employment history, and clean police record. Relief is not warranted.

The applicant is eligible for a personal appearance hearing provided the application is received within 15 years from the date of discharge. Representation at personal appearance hearing is recommended .



Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)

 A. Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560A, effective 870615 - 890110), Article 3630600, SEPARATION OF ENLISTED MEMBERS BY REASON OF MISCONDUCT – A PATTERN OF MISCONDUCT.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 2, AUTHORITY/POLICY FOR DEPARTMENTAL DISCHARGE REVIEW.

C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.2, PROPRIETY OF THE DISCHARGE.

D. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.3, EQUITY OF THE DISCHARGE.


PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ afls10.jag.af.mil ”.

The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                  Naval Council of Personnel Boards
                  Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                  720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                  Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023      


Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-00384

    Original file (ND02-00384.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    My discharge was inequitable because it was based on a "pattern of misconduct" isolated within the last 6 months of my service - my record until that point was spotless.2. 940829: BUPERS directed the Applicant's discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct. The Applicant asserts his overall service record warrants an upgrade to his discharge and his misconduct occurred during an isolated six months.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-01444

    Original file (ND03-01444.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND03-01444 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20030903. I WAS TOLD TO REPORT CAPTAIN MASS AND HE INFORMED ME THAT BECAUSE I HAD BEEN WRITTEN UP 3 TIMES AND THAT IT SHOWS A PATTERN OF MISCONDUCT AND HE RECOMMEND THAT I BE DISCHARGED UNDER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS. The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received, at the NDRB, within 15 years from the date of discharge.

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-01042

    Original file (ND99-01042.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).In response to the applicant’s issue 1, the Board found that the applicant had 3 NJPs in addition to being an alcohol rehabilitation failure. PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues...

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-00663

    Original file (ND99-00663.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Award: Forfeiture of $347.00 per month for 2 months, restriction and extra duty for 45 days, reduction to MSSA. 860224: An Administrative Discharge Board, based upon a preponderance of the evidence and by unanimous vote, found that the applicant had committed misconduct due to a drug abuse and misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct, that the misconduct warranted separation, and recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions. 860716: Commanding officer recommended discharge...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00373

    Original file (ND00-00373.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND00-00373 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 000128, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. No indication of appeal in the record.860924: Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse as evidenced by a positive random urinalysis for cocaine and misconduct due to commission of a serious...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-01116

    Original file (ND03-01116.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. Thank you A_ T_ (Applicant)” No indication of appeal in the record.911219: LOS ALAMOS (AFDB-7) notified Applicant of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct as result of you being found guilty of the following charges at CO’s nonjudicial punishment: 911213, violation of UCMJ, Article 86:...

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-00037

    Original file (ND99-00037.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND99-00037 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 981006, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. Naval Mobile Construction notified applicant of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of alcohol abuse rehabilitation failure as evidenced by your 21 May 1996 unauthorized absence from a formal Level III, Aftercare Program session with the...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00555

    Original file (ND00-00555.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    840511: Applicant counseled on existing VA-83 instructions in regards to: drug/alcohol abuse, legal consequences of illicit drug/alcohol abuse, urinalysis screening, and results of urinalysis test may be used for all purposes, including disciplinary action and discharge characterization.850321: Applicant referred to CAAC as a result of an alcohol related incident and family violence which occurred on 19Jan85. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-00851

    Original file (ND02-00851.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    No indication of appeal in the record.920228: Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of alcohol abuse rehabilitation failure as evidenced by failure to successfully complete Level III Rehabilitation Aftercare treatment; misconduct due to the commission of a serious offense as evidenced by violation UCMJ Article 134, Drunk and disorderly conduct and violation UCMJ Article 86, Unauthorized absence; and misconduct due to drug...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-01511

    Original file (ND03-01511.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. I just personally feel that I should have received my honorable discharge from the military based on my time in service. At this time, the Applicant has not provided sufficient documentation for the Board to consider an upgrade based on this reason.