Search Decisions

Decision Text

USMC | DRB | 2001_Marine | MD01-01204
Original file (MD01-01204.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

ex-PFC, USMC
Docket No. MD01-01204

Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review, received 010920, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. The applicant requested a documentary record discharge review. The applicant did not list any representative on the DD Form 293.

Decision

A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 020417. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, NDRB discerned no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the applicant’s service. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the character of the discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain: GENERAL (UNDER HONORABLE CONDITIONS)/PERSONALITY DISORDER, authority: MARCORSEPMAN Par. 6203.3

PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION


 Issues

1. We are enclosing a copy of our DD214 & also copy of DD214 with one correct social security #. Also requesting our discharge be upgraded to Honorable. Your help is greatly appreciate.

 Documentation
In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:
Copy of DD Form 214
Copy of DD Form 215

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Active: None
         Inactive: USMCR(J)                980624 - 990615  COG

 Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 990616               Date of Discharge: 000713

 Length of Service (years, months, days):

         Active: 01 00 28
         Inactive: None

 Age at Entry: 19                          Years Contracted: 5

 Education Level: 12                        AFQT: 79

 Highest Rank: PFC

 Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):

 Proficiency: 4.1 (1)                       Conduct: 4.1 (1)

 Military Decorations: None

 Unit/Campaign/Service Awards: None

 Days of Unauthorized Absence: None

 Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):

GENERAL (UNDER HONORABLE CONDITIONS)/PERSONALITY DISORDER, authority: MARCORSEPMAN Par. 6203.3.

 Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

000501:  Counseled for deficiencies in performance and conduct. [Diagnosed with
a personality disorder.] Necessary corrective actions explained, sources of assistance provided, disciplinary and discharge warning issued.
000501:  Counseled for deficiencies in performance and conduct. [Violation of Article 86 of the UCMJ.] Necessary corrective actions explained, sources of assistance provided, disciplinary and discharge warning issued.

000510:  Medical evaluation by a military psychiatrist concluded that the applicant’s personality disorder was so severe that his ability to function effectively in the military environment was significantly impaired.

         AXIS I: Adjustment Disorder
        
         AXIS II: Occupational Problems

         AXIS III: Partner Relational Problems

         AXIS IV: Personality Disorder

 000601:  Counseled for deficiencies in performance and conduct. [Diagnosed with an occupational problem and an adjustment disorder.] Necessary corrective actions explained, sources of assistance provided, disciplinary and discharge warning issued.

000613:  Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under honorable conditions (general) for the convenience of the government due to a personality disorder, based upon a diagnosed personality disorder as evidenced by psychiatric evaluation.

000613:  Applicant advised of his rights and having elected not to consult with counsel certified under UCMJ Article 27B, elected to waive all rights except the right to obtain copies of the documents used to support the basis for the separation.

000613:  Commanding officer recommended discharge under honorable conditions (general) for the convenience of the government due to a personality disorder, based upon a diagnosed personality disorder as evidenced by psychological evaluation. The factual basis for this recommendation was due to numerous disorders.

000621:  GCMCA [Commanding General, Marine Corps Air Ground Combat Center] directed the applicant's discharge under honorable conditions (general) for convenience of the government due to a personality disorder.

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW

Discussion

The applicant was discharged on 000713 general (under honorable conditions) for convenience of the government due to a personality disorder (A and B). The Board presumed regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs (C). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (D and E).

Issue 1. The applicant requested that his discharge be upgraded to Honorable. A characterization of service of under honorable conditions (general) is warranted when significant negative aspects of a member's conduct or performance of duty outweigh the positive aspects of the member's military record. T he applicant’s service was marred by adverse counseling entries for misconduct and failure to correct his occupational and adjustment disorders. The applicant’s conduct, which forms the primary basis for determining the character of his service, reflects his willful disobedience of the orders and directives which regulate good order and discipline in naval service, and falls short of that required for an honorable characterization of service. An upgrade to honorable would be inappropriate. Relief denied.

The applicant’s discharge characterization accurately reflects his service to his country. The discharge was proper and equitable. Normally, to permit relief, an error or injustice must have existed during the period of enlistment in question. No such error or injustice occurred during the applicant’s enlistment. Additionally, there is no law, or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time, or good conduct in civilian life, subsequent to leaving the service. However, the NDRB is authorized to consider outstanding post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge, to the extent that such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Verifiable proof of any post-service accomplishments must be provided in order for the applicant to claim post-service conduct and behavior as a reason to upgrade a less than Honorable discharge. Evidence of continuing educational pursuits, an employment record, documentation of community service, certification of non-involvement with civil authorities and proof of his not using drugs, are examples of verifiable documents that should have been provided to receive consideration for relief, based on post-service conduct. The applicant did not provide sufficient documentation to warrant an upgrade to his discharge. He is reminded that he remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received, at the NDRB, within 15 years from the date of his discharge. The applicant can provide additional documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments at that time. Legal representation at a personal appearance hearing is highly recommended but not required. Relief denied.


Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)

 A. Paragraph 6203, CONVENIENCE OF THE GOVERNMENT, of the Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, (MCO P1900.16E), effective 18 Aug 95 until Present.

 B. Table 6-1, Guide for Characterization of Service, of the Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, (MCO P1900.16E), effective 18 Aug 95 until Present.

 C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 2, AUTHORITY/POLICY FOR DEPARTMENTAL DISCHARGE REVIEW.

D. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.2, PROPRIETY OF THE DISCHARGE.

E. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.3, EQUITY OF THE DISCHARGE.

PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ afls10.jag.af.mil ”.

The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                  Naval Council of Personnel Boards
                  Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                  720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                  Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023      

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004 Marine | MD04-00509

    Original file (MD04-00509.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Necessary corrective actions explained, sources of assistance provided, disciplinary and discharge warning issued.010402: Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under honorable conditions (general) for the convenience of the government due to a personality disorder, based upon a diagnosed personality disorder as evidenced by psychological evaluation.010402: Applicant advised of rights and having elected not to consult with counsel certified under UCMJ Article 27B,...

  • USMC | DRB | 2001_Marine | MD01-00076

    Original file (MD01-00076.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requested a documentary record discharge review. I have since then been diagnosed as not having a personality disorder. Accordingly, partial relief is granted.The Board carefully considered the applicant’s request for an upgrade to Honorable by reason of Convenience of the Government, and found that other than his diagnosis of Personality disorder with suicidal ideation, the applicant had no adverse marks in his service record.

  • USMC | DRB | 1999_Marine | MD99-01209

    Original file (MD99-01209.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Issues Prior to the documentary discharge review, the applicant introduced no issues as block 8 on the DD Form 293 is blank. Muslims don’t' fight their brothers, man. 910124: Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under honorable conditions (general) for the convenience of the government due to a personality disorder, based upon a diagnosed personality disorder as evidenced by psychological evaluation and your demonstrated inability to function effectively in the...

  • USMC | DRB | 2002_Marine | MD02-00098

    Original file (MD02-00098.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD02-00098 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 011015, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:Copy of DD Form 214 PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Active: None Inactive: USMCR(J) 971021 - 971116 COG Period of Service Under...

  • USMC | DRB | 2003_Marine | MD03-01328

    Original file (MD03-01328.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. Relief denied.The Veterans Administration determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the NDRB. The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to: Naval Council of Personnel Boards Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board 720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309 Washington Navy Yard...

  • USMC | DRB | 2002_Marine | MD02-00191

    Original file (MD02-00191.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    981118: Commanding Officer recommended discharge under honorable conditions (general) for the convenience of the government due to a personality disorder, based upon a diagnosed personality disorder as evidenced by psychiatric evaluation. PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The applicant was discharged on 990114 with a general (under honorable conditions) for convenience of the government due to a personality disorder (A and B). A Marine’s conduct and...

  • USMC | DRB | 2003_Marine | MD03-00929

    Original file (MD03-00929.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable, and the narrative reason and RE code be changed. Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Applicant’s DD Form 214 Twenty-one pages from Applicant’s service record PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Active: None Inactive: None Period...

  • USMC | DRB | 2002_Marine | MD02-00648

    Original file (MD02-00648.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    SNM was then released several days later when found SNM was infact no danger to himself or others, still it was recommended by the Naval doctors of SNM command that SNM be administratively separated from the Marine Corps. The factual basis for this recommendation was psychiatrist's recommendation for administrative separation due to a personality disorder. The Board reviewed the Applicant's service and medical records to determine the propriety and equity of the separation process.

  • USMC | DRB | 1999_Marine | MD99-01222

    Original file (MD99-01222.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    921211: Counseled for deficiencies in performance and conduct. 930218: Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under Honorable conditions (General) for the Convenience of the Government due to a Personality Disorder, based upon a diagnosed personality disorder as evidenced by psychiatric evaluation. The characterization of service should have been based on the applicant’s service record.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004 Marine | MD04-00564

    Original file (MD04-00564.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:14 pages from Applicant’s medical record PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Active: Inactive: USMCR(J) 980724 - 981025 COG Period of Service Under Review :Date of Enlistment: 981026 Date of...