Search Decisions

Decision Text

USMC | DRB | 2001_Marine | MD01-01070
Original file (MD01-01070.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

ex-PFC, USMC
Docket No. MD01-01070

Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review, received 010813, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. The applicant requested a documentary record discharge review. The applicant did not list any representative on the DD Form 293.

Decision

A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 020215. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, NDRB discerned no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the applicant’s service. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the character of the discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain: GENERAL (UNDER HONORABLE CONDITIONS)/PERSONALITY DISORDER, authority: MARCORSEPMAN Par. 6203.3

PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION


 Issues (verbatim)

1. The loss of my mother was intensely devastating. At the time, I was under a lot of pressure as far as how I would handle funeral arrangements and personal belongings. I came from a single parent home, with no brothers and sisters. We were also very distant from other relatives. Time that was needed to heal my emotional pains were never considered by my superiors. Their only solution was anger management classes and speaking to a psychologist. Speaking to a psychologist did not grant me the time I needed. More than enough time has now past and I have carried forth my military training and used it to accomplish many personal goals. To include, but not limited to, attending college.

 Documentation
In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:
Copy of DD Form 214
Copy of applicant's resume

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Active: None
         Inactive: USMCR(J)                940129 - 941011  COG

 Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 941012               Date of Discharge: 980203

 Length of Service (years, months, days):

         Active: 03 03 22
         Inactive: None

 Age at Entry: 18                          Years Contracted: 4

 Education Level: 12                        AFQT: 45

 Highest Rank: LCpl

 Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):

 Proficiency: 4.3 (12)             Conduct: 4.3 (12)

 Military Decorations: None

 Unit/Campaign/Service Awards: NDSM, Letter of Appreciation (2), GCM

 Days of Unauthorized Absence: None

 Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):

GENERAL (UNDER HONORABLE CONDITIONS)/PERSONALITY DISORDER, authority: MARCORSEPMAN Par. 6203.3.

 Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

971022:  Counseled for deficiencies in performance and conduct. Substandard performance to date. Necessary corrective actions explained, sources of assistance provided, disciplinary and discharge warning issued.

 971202:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 86:
 Specification: Unauthorized absence 0545 to 0630, 25Nov97.
Awarded forfeiture of $200.00 per month for 1 month. Not appealed.
971203:  Counseled for deficiencies in performance and conduct. Misconduct for unauthorized absence which resulted in NJP. Necessary corrective actions explained, sources of assistance provided, disciplinary and discharge warning issued.

 971224:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 92:
 Specification: Violated Marine Corps Uniform Regulations by standards of dress.
Violation of UCMJ, Article 86:
Specification: Unauthorized absence from Legal Counsel appointment at 1245, 18Dec97.
Awarded forfeiture of $505.00 per month for 2 months, restriction for 45 days, reduction to PFC. Not appealed.
971224:  Counseled for deficiencies in performance and conduct. [Misconduct for unauthorized absence and failure to obey regulations which resulted in NJP.] Necessary corrective actions explained, sources of assistance provided, disciplinary and discharge warning issued.
980106:  Medical evaluation by a military psychologist concluded that the applicant’s personality disorder was so severe that his ability to function effectively in the military environment was significantly impaired. Although not currently suicidal or homicidal, this member is judged to represent a risk to self or others if retained on active duty, especially in view of past self-mutilative behaviors. It is also recommended that he not have access to any weapon, not operate government vehicles, and not work with classified materials.
                  AXIS I: Occupational problem
          AXIS II: Personality disorder
         AXIS III: Recurrent difficulties breathing
         AXIS IV: Lack of support system

 980107:  Counseled for deficiencies in performance and conduct. Medical evaluation conducted on 980106. Necessary corrective actions explained, sources of assistance provided, disciplinary and discharge warning issued.

980109:  Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under honorable conditions (general) for the convenience of the government due to a personality disorder, based upon a diagnosed personality disorder as evidenced by psychological evaluation.

980109:  Applicant advised of his rights and having elected not to consult with counsel certified under UCMJ Article 27B, elected to waive all rights except the right to obtain copies of the documents used to support the basis for the separation.

980109:  Commanding officer recommended discharge under honorable conditions (general) for the convenience of the government due to a personality disorder, based upon a diagnosed personality disorder as evidenced by psychological evaluation. The factual basis for this recommendation was your diagnosis as having a borderline personality disorder.

980113:  SJA review determined the case sufficient in law and fact.

981014:  GCMCA, Commanding General, Marine Corps Base, Hawaii, directed the applicant's discharge under honorable conditions (general) for convenience of the government due to a personality disorder.

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW

Discussion

The applicant was discharged on 980203 general (under honorable conditions) for convenience of the government due to a personality disorder (A and B). The Board presumed regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs (C). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (D and E).

 The Board determined the applicant’s issue is non-decisional. No further comment is required. Relief is not warranted.

 Normally, to permit relief, an error or injustice must have existed during the period of enlistment in question. No such error or injustice occurred during the applicant’s enlistment. Additionally, there is no law, or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time, or good conduct in civilian life, subsequent to leaving the service. However, the NDRB is authorized to consider outstanding post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge, to the extent that such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Verifiable proof of any post-service accomplishments must be provided in order for the applicant to claim post-service conduct and behavior as a reason to upgrade a less than Honorable discharge. Evidence of continuing educational pursuits, an employment record, documentation of community service, certification of non-involvement with civil authorities and proof of his not using drugs, are examples of verifiable documents that should have been provided to receive consideration for clemency, based on post-service conduct. The applicant did not provide any of these documents. He is reminded that he remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received, at the NDRB, within 15 years from the date of his discharge. The applicant can provide additional documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments at that time. Legal representation at a personal appearance hearing is highly recommended but not required.

Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)

 A. Paragraph 6203, CONVENIENCE OF THE GOVERNMENT, of the Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, (MCO P1900.16E), effective 18 Aug 95 until Present.

 B. Table 6-1, Guide for Characterization of Service, of the Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, (MCO P1900.16E), effective 18 Aug 95 until Present.

 C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 2, AUTHORITY/POLICY FOR DEPARTMENTAL DISCHARGE REVIEW.
D. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.2, PROPRIETY OF THE DISCHARGE.

E. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.3, EQUITY OF THE DISCHARGE.

PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ afls10.jag.af.mil ”.

The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                  Naval Council of Personnel Boards
                  Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                  720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                  Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023      

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004 Marine | MD04-00564

    Original file (MD04-00564.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:14 pages from Applicant’s medical record PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Active: Inactive: USMCR(J) 980724 - 981025 COG Period of Service Under Review :Date of Enlistment: 981026 Date of...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004 Marine | MD04-00509

    Original file (MD04-00509.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Necessary corrective actions explained, sources of assistance provided, disciplinary and discharge warning issued.010402: Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under honorable conditions (general) for the convenience of the government due to a personality disorder, based upon a diagnosed personality disorder as evidenced by psychological evaluation.010402: Applicant advised of rights and having elected not to consult with counsel certified under UCMJ Article 27B,...

  • USMC | DRB | 2001_Marine | MD01-00310

    Original file (MD01-00310.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Unauthorized absence and your continued lack of reasonable effort evidenced by your poor performance are violations of the UCMJ and will not be tolerated.] Necessary corrective actions explained, sources of assistance provided, disciplinary and discharge warning issued.951017: Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under honorable conditions (general) for the convenience of the government due to a personality disorder, based upon a diagnosed personality disorder as...

  • USMC | DRB | 2001_Marine | MD01-00689

    Original file (MD01-00689.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Necessary corrective actions explained, sources of assistance provided, disciplinary and discharge warning issued.960104: Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under honorable conditions (general) for the convenience of the government due to a personality disorder, based upon a diagnosed personality disorder as evidenced by psychological evaluation. 960205: Commanding officer recommended discharge under honorable conditions (general) for the convenience of the...

  • USMC | DRB | 1999_Marine | MD99-01082

    Original file (MD99-01082.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, NDRB discerned impropriety in the characterization of the applicant’s service. 950630: GCMCA [Commander, Marine Corps Base Hawaii] directed the applicant's discharge under honorable conditions (general) for convenience of the government due to a personality disorder. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004 Marine | MD04-00790

    Original file (MD04-00790.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. 000307: Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under honorable conditions (general) for the convenience of the government due to a personality disorder, based upon a diagnosed personality disorder. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and...

  • USMC | DRB | 1999_Marine | MD99-01209

    Original file (MD99-01209.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Issues Prior to the documentary discharge review, the applicant introduced no issues as block 8 on the DD Form 293 is blank. Muslims don’t' fight their brothers, man. 910124: Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under honorable conditions (general) for the convenience of the government due to a personality disorder, based upon a diagnosed personality disorder as evidenced by psychological evaluation and your demonstrated inability to function effectively in the...

  • USMC | DRB | 2002_Marine | MD02-00096

    Original file (MD02-00096.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :981118: Medical evaluation by a military psychologist concluded that the applicant’s personality disorder was so severe that his ability to function effectively in the military environment was significantly impaired.981123: Counseled for deficiencies in performance and conduct. 981216: Commanding officer recommended discharge under honorable conditions (general) for the convenience of the government due to a personality disorder, based...

  • USMC | DRB | 2001_Marine | MD01-00903

    Original file (MD01-00903.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Necessary corrective actions explained, sources of assistance provided, disciplinary and discharge warning issued.980203: NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 86:Specification: Unauthorized absence from appointed place of duty at 0731, 9Jan98, to wit: rifle range.Awarded forfeiture of $200.00 per month for 1 month, restriction and extra duties for 45 days, reduction to LCpl. The separation authority directed that the primary reason for discharge would be for misconduct. The applicant can...

  • USMC | DRB | 2003_Marine | MD03-01478

    Original file (MD03-01478.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD03-01478 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20030911. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The Applicant was discharged on 19950731 under honorable conditions (general) for convenience of the government due to a personality disorder (A and B).