Search Decisions

Decision Text

USMC | DRB | 2001_Marine | MD01-00806
Original file (MD01-00806.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

ex-Pvt, USMC
Docket No. MD01-00806

Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review, received 010522, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. The applicant requested a documentary record discharge review. The applicant did not list any representative on the DD Form 293.

Decision

A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 011218. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, NDRB discerned no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the applicant’s service. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the character of the discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain: UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/MISCONDUCT, authority: MARCORSEPMAN 6210.5.

PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION

Issues (verbatim)

1. I am writing to the board in hope of getting my discharge changed from "other than honorable" to "honorable”. First of all, I was separated from the United States Marine Corps for failing a unit urinalysis which took 5 months to receive the results to. I admit, I was wrong for wrongfully using marijuana and it was only that one time! Despite of my offense, I know I have learned a valuable lesson. Now I have a family, my wife and a 1 year old daughter, and I need an honorable discharge so I can use my Montgomery GI Bill to get the proper schooling to support my family. For me, being released from the USMC was bad enough! Should me and my family have to pay forever for my 1 mistake? I did serve 3 of my 4 years and once a Marine, always a Marine! I am only 22 and it makes it more harder for me to support my family because of inexperience. So I please ask on behalf of me and my family that my discharge be changed to honorable.

Thank you for your time,

 Documentation
In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:
None

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Active: None
         Inactive: USMCR(J)                970509 - 970526  COG

 Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 970527               Date of Discharge: 000324

 Length of Service (years, months, days):

         Active: 02 09 28
         Inactive: None

 Age at Entry: 18                          Years Contracted: 4

 Education Level: 12                        AFQT: 53

 Highest Rank: LCpl

 Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):

 Proficiency: 3.8 (9)                       Conduct: 3.7 (9)

 Military Decorations: None

 Unit/Campaign/Service Awards: Letter of Appreciation

 Days of Unauthorized Absence: None

 Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):

UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/MISCONDUCT, authority: MARCORSEPMAN 6210.5.

 Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

970509:  Applicant briefed upon and certified understanding of Marine Corps policy concerning illegal use of drugs.
990409:  Counseled for deficiencies in performance and conduct. [Disobedience to orders and unauthorized absence. On one occasion when given a lawful order, you failed to obey that order. Additionally, when the situation arose with your disabled vehicle you failed to contact the unit in a timely manner. Therefore causing concern for your well being and accountability]. Necessary corrective actions explained, sources of assistance provided, disciplinary and discharge warning issued.

990714:  Medical evaluation for drug abuse found the applicant to be a drug abuser, not drug dependent.

990817:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 86:
 Specification: Unauthorized absence from 0601-0625, 3Aug99
Awarded restriction and extra duties for 14 days. Restriction and extra duty for 9 days suspended for 6 months. Not appealed.

991013:  Special Court-Martial.
         Charge I: violation of the UCMJ, Article 112A:
         Specification: Wrongfully use of marijuana on 16Feb99.
         Findings: to Charge I and specification thereunder, guilty.
         Sentence: Confinement for 45 days, reduction to Pvt.
         CA 991027: Sentence approved and ordered executed.
991222:  Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse and misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct.
991223:  Applicant advised of his rights and having consulted with counsel certified under UCMJ Article 27B, elected to waive all rights except the right to obtain copies of the documents used to support the basis for the separation.

000207:  Commanding officer recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct and drug abuse. The factual basis for this recommendation was platoon counseling for unauthorized absence on 16 January 1998, your nonjudicial punishment for unauthorized absence on 17 August 1999, your civilian arrest for possession of marijuana and drunk in public on 6 May 1998 which resulted in your special court-martial for wrongful use of marijuana on 13 October 1999, and the pattern of misconduct shown by those convictions and appropriate counseling.

000306:  SJA review determined the case sufficient in law and fact.

000323:  GCMCA [Commanding General, 3d Marine Aircraft Wing] directed the applicant's discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse.

 PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW

Discussion

The applicant was discharged on 000324 under other than honorable conditions for misconduct due to drug abuse (A and B). The Board presumed regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs (C). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (D and E).

 Issue 1. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a court-martial case, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency (C, Part IV). The applicant’s case was considered under the pertinent standards of equity to determine if any factors in this particular case merited clemency. The NDRB found the applicant’s service record devoid of any mitigating or extenuating factors sufficient to offset the seriousness of the offenses for which the discharge was awarded. Relief denied.
The applicant is reminded that he remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received, at the NDRB, within 15 years from the date of his discharge. The applicant can provide additional documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments at that time. Legal representation at a personal appearance hearing is highly recommended but not required. Relief denied.

 Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)

 A. Paragraph 6210, MISCONDUCT , of the Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, (MCO P1900.16E), effective 18 Aug 95 to Present.

B. The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if adjudged as part of the sentence upon conviction by a special or general court-martial for violation of the UCMJ, Article 112a, wrongful use of a controlled substance.
C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 2, AUTHORITY/POLICY FOR DEPARTMENTAL DISCHARGE REVIEW.

D. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.2, PROPRIETY OF THE DISCHARGE.

E. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.3, EQUITY OF THE DISCHARGE.

PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ afls10.jag.af.mil ”.

The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                  Naval Council of Personnel Boards
                  Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                  720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                  Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023      


Similar Decisions

  • USMC | DRB | 2000_Marine | MD00-00680

    Original file (MD00-00680.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    I am requesting a review of my Marine Corps discharge based upon my existing records and my performance since leaving the Corps in 1998.2. This misconduct violated the conditions of your suspended separation. Relief denied.The Board found that the applicant received a drug waiver for his prior drug usage.

  • USMC | DRB | 2003_Marine | MD03-00499

    Original file (MD03-00499.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD03-00499 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20030203. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable or general/under honorable conditions. However, the NDRB is authorized to consider outstanding post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge, to the extent that such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-01294

    Original file (ND02-01294.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND02-01294 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 020912, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable or general/under honorable conditions. Decision A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 030722. Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:Handwritten letter from Applicant's wife (2 pages) Copies of DD...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-00894

    Original file (ND01-00894.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The applicant was discharged on 000602 under other than honorable conditions for misconduct due to drug abuse (use) (A). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).Issue 1. Verifiable proof of any post-service accomplishments must be provided in order for the applicant to claim...

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-01127

    Original file (ND99-01127.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board’s vote was unanimous that the character of the discharge shall change to: GENERAL (UNDER HONORABLE CONDITIONS)/MISCONDUCT, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 3630620.The NDRB did note an administrative error on the original DD Form 214. No further information found.970515: Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse as evidenced by CO's NJP 2 Apr 97 and NAVDRUGLAB JACKSONVILLE msg...

  • USMC | DRB | 2000_Marine | MD00-00110

    Original file (MD00-00110.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD00-00110 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 991026, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to General/under Honorable conditions. Decision A document discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 000802. The recommendation from the applicant’s administrative discharge review board was to separate him, and the characterization of his discharge would be under Honorable conditions (General).

  • USMC | DRB | 2001_Marine | MD01-00255

    Original file (MD01-00255.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Mbr admitted that one of the routine activities they do in their get-togethers is to use marijuana. Pt does not want admission to hospital nor think it is indicated as pt does not appear to be an eminent treat to self or others. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was neither proper nor equitable (D and E).In reviewing the record, the Board noted both the applicant’s enlistment waiver...

  • USMC | DRB | 2000_Marine | MD00-01091

    Original file (MD00-01091.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (D and E).The applicant introduced no decisional issues for consideration by the Board. The applicant is reminded that he remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing provided that an application is received within 15 years from the date of discharge. The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes the award of a punitive...

  • USMC | DRB | 2000_Marine | MD00-00549

    Original file (MD00-00549.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD00-00549 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 000328, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).In the applicant’s issue 1, the NDRB determined this issue is without merit. The applicant should provide evidence...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004 Marine | MD04-00484

    Original file (MD04-00484.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Ihope that you can understand that it was a stupid thing for me to have done and I have paid for it time and time again and can only hope that you believe me that the discharge is only half of the punishment I received on top of me being busted down forfeiture of pay extra duty and the way I was treated my last month of active duty, it was very painful knowing I let down my family my friends my fellow marines and my country more than all of that I let down myself and I have to live with that...