Search Decisions

Decision Text

USMC | DRB | 2001_Marine | MD01-00748
Original file (MD01-00748.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT


ex-PFC, USMC
Docket No. MD01-00748

Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review, received 010303, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. The applicant requested a documentary record discharge review. The applicant did not list any representative on the DD Form 293.

Decision

A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 011018. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, NDRB discerned no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the applicant’s service. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the character of the discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain: UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/MISCONDUCT, authority: MARCORSEPMAN 6210.5.

PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION


Issues

1. My hope are to have an upgrade of discharge to honorable so I can work government jobs, (i.e. Raythron Hughes Aircraft, Post Office, etc.) or perhaps re-enlist. G.I. Bill Privileges & monies, this would be detrimental to my future, VA Privileges such as home loans and privileges that I don't know about. I've lost hearing in the Marine Corps and I'd like to pursue compensation from the VA. I have attached a few letters from family & friends, perhaps they can assist in my assment. Thank you for your time.

Documentation
In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:
Copy of DD Form 214
Letter from Applicant (3pgs)
 Character Reference Letters (2)
California All-Purpose Acknowledgement
Letter from Applicant's mother (2pgs)

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Active: USMC              None
          Inactive: USMCR(J)                971009 - 971116  COG

 Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 971117               Date of Discharge: 991229

 Length of Service (years, months, days):
         Active: 02 01 13
          Inactive: None
Age at Entry: 19                          Years Contracted: 4

Education Level: 12                        AFQT: 45
Highest Rank: LCpl

 Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):
Proficiency: 4.4 (4)                       Conduct: 4.4 (4)

 Military Decorations: None
Unit/Campaign/Service Awards: Rifle Expert Badge

 Days of Unauthorized Absence: None
Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):

UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/MISCONDUCT, authority: MARCORSEPMAN 6210.5.

 Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

970910:  Applicant briefed upon and certified understanding of Marine Corps policy concerning illegal use of drugs.
990721:  NAVDRUGLAB [SAN DIEGO, CA], reported applicant’s urine sample, received 990714, tested positive for [Amphetamine, Methamphetamine and THC].
991003:  Summary Court-Martial.
          Charge I: violation of the UCMJ, Article 112A: Wrongfully used marijuana on or about 990712.
         Finding: to Charge I and the specification thereunder, guilty.
          Sentence: Forfeiture of $537.00 pay per month for 1 month, restriction for 30 days (suspended for 6 months) reduced to E-2.
         CA action 991015: Sentence approved and ordered executed.
991104:  Refusal of Medical Officer's Evaluation.

 991110:  Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse.
991110:  Applicant advised of his rights and having elected to consult with counsel certified under UCMJ Article 27B, elected to waive all rights except the right to obtain copies of the documents used to support the basis for the separation.
991110:  Commanding officer recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse. The factual basis for this recommendation was your illegal use of marijuana on or about 990712.

 991217:  SJA review determined the case sufficient in law and fact.

xxxxxx:  GCMCA [Commanding General, 1 st Force Service Support Group] directed the applicant's discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse.

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW

Discussion

The applicant was discharged on 991229 under other than honorable conditions for misconduct due to drug abuse (A and B). The Board presumed regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs (C). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (D and E).
Issue 1. The Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment opportunities as requested in the issue. The Board’s charter limits its review to a determination on the propriety and equity of the discharge. In the applicant’s case the Board could discern no impropriety or inequity and therefore considered the applicant’s discharge was proper and equitable. The applicant used illegal drugs. Drug abuse warranted processing for separation, normally under other than honorable conditions. Relief denied.
Normally, to permit relief, an error or injustice must have existed during the period of enlistment in question. No such error or injustice occurred during the applicant’s enlistment. Additionally, there is no law, or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time, or good conduct in civilian life, subsequent to leaving the service. However, the NDRB is authorized to consider outstanding post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge, to the extent that such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Verifiable proof of any post-service accomplishments must be provided in order for the applicant to claim post-service conduct and behavior as a reason to upgrade a less than Honorable discharge. Evidence of continuing educational pursuits, an employment record, documentation of community service, certification of non-involvement with civil authorities and proof of his not using drugs, are examples of verifiable documents that should have been provided to receive consideration for relief, based on post-service conduct. The applicant did not provide sufficient documentation to warrant an upgrade to his discharge. He is reminded that he remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received, at the NDRB, within 15 years from the date of his discharge. The applicant can provide additional documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments at that time. Legal representation at a personal appearance hearing is highly recommended but not required. Relief denied.

Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)
A. Paragraph 6210, MISCONDUCT , of the Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, (MCO P1900.16E), effective 18 Aug 95 to Present.

B. The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if adjudged as part of the sentence upon conviction by a special or general court-martial for violation of the UCMJ, Article 112a, wrongful use of a controlled substance.
C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 2, AUTHORITY/POLICY FOR DEPARTMENTAL DISCHARGE REVIEW.

D. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.2, PROPRIETY OF THE DISCHARGE.

 E. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.3, EQUITY OF THE DISCHARGE.

PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ afls10.jag.af.mil ”.

The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                   Naval Council of Personnel Boards
                   Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                   720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                   Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023      


Similar Decisions

  • USMC | DRB | 1999_Marine | MD99-00797

    Original file (MD99-00797.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Decision A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 000403. The discharge shall remain: UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS, with the Reason for Separation corrected to reflect "Misconduct-Drug abuse (with admin discharge board), authority: MARCORSEPMAN Par. Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)A. Paragraph 6210 MISCONDUCT , of the Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, (MCO P1900.16C), Change 2, effective 15 Apr 84 until 28 Jul 87.B.

  • USMC | DRB | 2001_Marine | MD01-00752

    Original file (MD01-00752.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:Copy of MTI College Enrollment Agreement Copy of Letter of Congratulation into MTI College Letter from Applicant PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Active: USMC None Inactive: USMCR(J) 960622 - 961208 COG Period of Service Under Review :Date of Enlistment: 961209 Date of Discharge: 000810 Length of...

  • USMC | DRB | 2003_Marine | MD03-00049

    Original file (MD03-00049.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Applicant's DD Form 214 (Member 4) (2 copies) PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Active: None Inactive: USMCR(J) 950322 - 950326 COG Period of Service Under Review :Date of Enlistment: 950327 Date of Discharge: 990115 Length of Service (years, months, days):Active: 03 09 19 Inactive: None Necessary...

  • USMC | DRB | 2002_Marine | MD02-00124

    Original file (MD02-00124.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:Copy of DD Form 214 (2 copies) PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Active: None Inactive: USMCR(J) 951012 - 951210 COG Period of Service Under Review :Date of Enlistment: 951211 Date of Discharge: 970103 Length of Service (years, months, days):Active: 01 00 23 Inactive: None Chronological Listing of...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004 Marine | MD04-00600

    Original file (MD04-00600.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable or general/under honorable conditions. ________________________________________________________________________ In accordance with 32 C.F.R., section 724.166 and SECNAVINST 5420.174C, enclosure (1), paragraph 1.16, The American Legion submits to the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB or Board) the above issue and following statement in supplement to this Applicant’s petition. ...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004 Marine | MD04-00258

    Original file (MD04-00258.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The Applicant was discharged on 19931123 under other than honorable conditions for misconduct due to drug abuse (A). PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise...

  • USMC | DRB | 2000_Marine | MD00-00358

    Original file (MD00-00358.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).The applicant introduced no decisional issues for consideration by the Board. At this time the applicant has not provided sufficient documentation of good character and conduct. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint.

  • USMC | DRB | 2000_Marine | MD00-00267

    Original file (MD00-00267.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Block 24, Character of Service should read: “UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS” vice “GENERAL (UNDER HONORABLE CONDITIONS).” The original DD Form 214 should be corrected or reissued as appropriate. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (D and E).The applicant introduced no decisional issues for consideration by the Board. You should read Enclosure (5) of the...

  • USMC | DRB | 2000_Marine | MD00-00032

    Original file (MD00-00032.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The applicant was discharged on 931122 under other than honorable conditions for misconduct due to drug abuse (A). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).In the applicant’s issue, the Board found this to be non-decisional. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent that such...

  • USMC | DRB | 2001_Marine | MD01-01029

    Original file (MD01-01029.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The applicant was discharged on 991104 under other than honorable conditions for misconduct due to drug abuse (A). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).Issue 1. The Board could discern no injustice in how the applicant’s command handled the applicant’s misconduct and...