Search Decisions

Decision Text

USMC | DRB | 2001_Marine | MD01-00716
Original file (MD01-00716.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT


ex-Pvt, USMC
Docket No. MD01-00716

Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review, received 010426, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. The applicant requested a documentary record discharge review. The applicant did not list any representative on the DD Form 293.

Decision

A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 011018. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, NDRB discerned no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the applicant’s service. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the character of the discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain: UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/MISCONDUCT, authority: MARCORSEPMAN 6210.5.

PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION


Issues

1. To The Personal Reviewing
I would like my discharge upgraded to Honorable because I wish to Pursue my Law Enforcement dream. My father has just resently retired for the force after 29 years. I have taken all classes including law enforcement, CPR, First Responder, and the CIVIL SERVICE EXAM scoring a "97%". I would have no problem getting on the force if my discharge was upgraded. This has been a lifelong dream to walk in my fathers footsteps and I joined the Marine Corps to pursue that dream. I was cut short when I got w/the wrong crowd. I blame myself for my actions I took while enlisted but like every good man. I have learned and paid for my mistakes. It has been 4 years since I've been discharged and not one day goes by where I don't think about how ignorant and foolish I was. I don't regret what I've done because It has made me even stronger today. I have been sober and clean from marijuana since my discharge day. I am married to a wonderful girl whom I met immediatly after coming home and I have two children. There would be nothing in the world that would make me happier than to be able to tell my father that I am a Police Officer. Like I said my discharge is the only thing standing in my way of a childhood dream. Please consider my application carefully and Thank You for you time.
Documentation
In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:
Copy of DD Form 214

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Active: None
          Inactive: USMCR           940329 - 90423   ELS
 USMCR(J)                 940523 - 940626  COG
Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 940627               Date of Discharge: 970416

 Length of Service (years, months, days):
         Active: 02 09 20
          Inactive: None
Age at Entry: 19                          Years Contracted: 4

 Education Level: 12                        AFQT: 52
Highest Rank: LCpl

 Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):

 Proficiency: 3.7 (8)                       Conduct: 3.0 (9)
Military Decorations: None

 Unit/Campaign/Service Awards: NDSM, SSDR, AFEM, NATO, Certificate of Commendation
Days of Unauthorized Absence: 111

 Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):

UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/MISCONDUCT, authority: MARCORSEPMAN 6210.5.

 Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

940326:  Applicant briefed upon and certified understanding of Marine Corps policy concerning illegal use of drugs.
951204:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 128:
 Specification: Assault Cpl by striking him in the back of the head on 2310, 7Nov95.
 Awarded forfeiture of $232.00 per month for 1 month, extra duties for 14 days. Forfeiture of $232.00 for 1 month suspended for 6 months. No indication of appeal in service record.
960110:  Counseled for deficiencies in performance and conduct. [Lack of financial responsibility. Specifically, writing checks without sufficient funds]. Necessary corrective actions explained, sources of assistance provided, disciplinary and discharge warning issued.
960308:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 134 (9 specs)
 Specification: Make and utter 9 worthless checks totaling $1275.00.
 Awarded forfeiture of $150.00 per month for 1 months, restriction and extra duties for 14 days. Not appealed.
960325:  Vacate forfeiture of $232.00 for 1 month awarded at CO's NJP dated 4Dec95.
960607:  Counseled for deficiencies in performance and conduct. [Uttering worthless checks]. Necessary corrective actions explained, sources of assistance provided, disciplinary and discharge warning issued.
960624:  Summary Court-Martial.
          Charge I: violation of the UCMJ, Article 134.
         Specification 1: Make and utter worthless checks in the amount of $175.00.
          Specification 2: Make and utter worthless checks in the amount of $400.00.
          Finding: to Charge I and II the specifications thereunder, guilty.
         Sentence: Forfeiture of $640.00, confinement for 30 days, reduced to PFC.
          CA action 960624: Sentence approved and with the exception of forfeiture of $640.00 pay per month for 1 month is hereby ordered executed. The forfeiture is suspended for a period of 6 months.

 960824:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 86:
 Specification: Unauthorized absence from 0631, 29Jul96 to 0800, 8Aug96 (10 days/surrendered).
 Awarded reduction to Pvt. Not appealed.
960826:  Vacate forfeiture awarded at summary court-martial on 24Jun96.
960913:  NAVDRUGLAB, Jacksonville, FL, reported applicant’s urine sample, received 960904, tested positive for THC.
961010:  Medical evaluation for alcohol/drug abuse found the applicant to be a drug abuser, and alcohol dependent. Recommend intensive outpatient treatment.

961025:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 112A:
 Specification: Use marijuana from 1Sep96 to 10Sep96.
 Awarded forfeiture of $435.00 per month for 2 months, restriction and extra duties for 45 days. Not appealed.
961031:  Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse.
961031:  Applicant advised of his rights and having consulted with counsel certified under UCMJ Article 27B, elected to waive all rights.
961031:  Commanding officer recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse. The factual basis for this recommendation was NJP held on 25 October 1996 and Director CDAC evaluation.

970227:  Summary Court-Martial.
         Charge I: violation of the UCMJ, Article 86.
          Specification: Unauthorized absence from 0631, 1Nov96 to 1430, 10Feb97 (101 days/surrendered).
         Charge II: violation of the UCMJ, Article 134:
         Specification: Break restriction.
         Finding: to Charge I and II and the specifications thereunder, guilty.
         Sentence: Forfeiture of $594.00, confined for 30 days.
         CA action 970227: Sentence approved and ordered executed except for that portion of the punishment adjudging forfeiture of $594.00 for 1 month.

970227:  Applicant to confinement.

970326:  SJA review determined the case sufficient in law and fact.

970327:  Applicant refused rehabilitation treatment.

970331:  GCMCA [Commanding General, 2d Marine Division, U.S. Marine Corps Forces, Atlantic] directed the applicant's discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse.

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW

Discussion

The applicant was discharged on 970416 under other than honorable conditions for misconduct due to drug abuse (A and B). The Board presumed regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs (C). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (D and E).
Issue 1. The applicant used illegal drugs. Drug abuse warranted processing for separation, normally under other than honorable conditions. The applicant’s discharge characterization accurately reflects his service to his country. The discharge was proper and equitable. Normally, to permit relief, an error or injustice must have existed during the period of enlistment in question. No such error or injustice occurred during the applicant’s enlistment. Additionally, there is no law, or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time, or good conduct in civilian life, subsequent to leaving the service. However, the NDRB is authorized to consider outstanding post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge, to the extent that such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Verifiable proof of any post-service accomplishments must be provided in order for the applicant to claim post-service conduct and behavior as a reason to upgrade a less than Honorable discharge. Evidence of continuing educational pursuits, an employment record, documentation of community service, certification of non-involvement with civil authorities and proof of his not using drugs, are examples of verifiable documents that should have been provided to receive consideration for relief, based on post-service conduct. The applicant did not provide sufficient documentation to warrant an upgrade to his discharge. He is reminded that he remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received, at the NDRB, within 15 years from the date of his discharge. The applicant can provide additional documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments at that time. Legal representation at a personal appearance hearing is highly recommended but not required. Relief denied.


Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)
A. Paragraph 6210, MISCONDUCT , of the Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, (MCO P1900.16E), effective 18 Aug 95 to Present.

B. The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if adjudged as part of the sentence upon conviction by a special or general court-martial for violation of the UCMJ, Article 112a, wrongful use of a controlled substance.
C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 2, AUTHORITY/POLICY FOR DEPARTMENTAL DISCHARGE REVIEW.

D. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.2, PROPRIETY OF THE DISCHARGE.

 E. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.3, EQUITY OF THE DISCHARGE.

PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ afls10.jag.af.mil ”.

The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                   Naval Council of Personnel Boards
                  Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                  720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                  Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023      


Similar Decisions

  • USMC | DRB | 2002_Marine | MD02-00663

    Original file (MD02-00663.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD02-00663 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 020409, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions and that the RE Code be changed. Dear Chairperson:After a review of the Former Service Members (FSM) DD Form 293 Application for the Naval Discharge Review Board of Discharge or Dismissal from the Armed Forces of the United States and all of the evidence assembled for review, we continue to...

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-00047

    Original file (ND99-00047.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    discharge. The Board found the applicant had requested an Administrative Discharge Board (ADB) in lieu of a Special Court Martial on 27 Feb 97 in order to avoid the possibility of a bad conduct or dishonorable discharge. Further, applicant’s submitted issue contains text admitting having been UA by stating “…I wanted out, and off of that ship.

  • USMC | DRB | 2000_Marine | MD00-00173

    Original file (MD00-00173.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:Copy of DD Form 214 PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Two months prior to the Special Court-Martial, while in Yuma, the applicant was found guilty of writing 29 worthless checks. The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if adjudged as part of the sentence upon conviction by a special or general court-martial for violation of the...

  • USMC | DRB | 2001_Marine | MD01-00471

    Original file (MD01-00471.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD01-00471 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 010227, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable . Body fat 28%.930707: Vacate suspended forfeiture awarded at CO's NJP on 23Apr93. The Board found that the applicant was discharged for his unsatisfactory performance while on weight control.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0600214

    Original file (ND0600214.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to general (under honorable conditions) and that the Narrative Reason for Separation be changed. The separation authority directed that the Applicant be discharge by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse. The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if adjudged as part of the sentence upon conviction by a special or general court-martial for violation...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-00733

    Original file (ND01-00733.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND01-00733 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 010507, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION The applicant can provide additional documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments at that time.

  • USMC | DRB | 2002_Marine | MD02-01276

    Original file (MD02-01276.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD02-01276 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 020906, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (D and E).A characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00222

    Original file (ND00-00222.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND00-00222 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 991202, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).In the applicant’s issue 1, the Board does not accept alcohol abuse as a factor sufficient to exculpate the applicant...

  • USMC | DRB | 2001_Marine | MD01-00885

    Original file (MD01-00885.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD01-00885 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 010625, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if adjudged as part of the sentence upon conviction by a special or general court-martial for violation of the UCMJ, Article 86, unauthorized absence for more than 30 days;...

  • USMC | DRB | 2002_Marine | MD02-01028

    Original file (MD02-01028.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (D and E).Issues 1 and 2: The Applicant contends that his post-service conduct, to include employment, family life, and the fact that he no longer drinks nor uses drugs, should be considered in the recharacterization of his discharge. This was the case with the Applicant who was placed on appellate leave until his sentence,...