Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-01081
Original file (ND00-01081.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

ex-RMSA, USN
Docket No. ND00-01081

Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review, received 000926, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. The applicant requested a documentary record discharge review. The applicant did not list any listed representative on the DD Form 293.

Decision

A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 010313. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, NDRB discerned no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the applicant’s service. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the character of the discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain: UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/Misconduct – Drug abuse (Use), authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 3630620.

PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION

Issues (verbatim)

1. Gentlemen,

I desire an upgrade in my discharge for reasons that are important to my life.

Since being discharged, I have made every attempt to be a good upstanding citizen making contributions to my community and being gainfully employed.

However, at this stage as I plan career and try to explain my military experience to my children, my other than honorable discharge presents difficults.

Accordingly, please consider me a veteran who has and continues to be a good person and worthy of an upgrade.

Personal and professional references are available.


 Documentation
In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:
Copy of DD Form 214 (2 copies)

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Active: None
         Inactive: USNR (DEP)     831221 - 840723  COG

 Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 840724               Date of Discharge: 871028

 Length of Service (years, months, days):

         Active: 03 03 05
         Inactive: None

 Age at Entry: 18                          Years Contracted: 4

 Education Level: 12                        AFQT: 42

 Highest Rate: RMSN

 Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):

 Performance: 3.45 (4)    Behavior: 3.40 (5)                OTA: 3.40

 Military Decorations: None

 Unit/Campaign/Service Awards: None

 Days of Unauthorized Absence: None

 Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):

UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/Misconduct – Drug abuse (Use), authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 3630620.

 Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

830725:  Applicant briefed on Navy's policy on drug and alcohol abuse.

 8701??:  Drug and Alcohol Abuse Report: Marijuana abuse, less than monthly, ashore off duty January 1987. SAC found applicant not dependent. Unit sweep. Commanding officer recommended retention.
870130:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 112A: Wrongful use of marijuana on 5Jan87.
         Award: Forfeiture of $200 per month for 2 months, restriction and extra duty for 45 days, reduction to RMSA. No indication of appeal in the record.
870130:  Retention Warning: Advised of deficiency (Wrongful use of marijuana.), notified of corrective actions and assistance available, advised of consequences of further deficiencies, and issued discharge warning.

870810:  Drug Abuse/ETOH medical evaluation: Voluntary disclosure. Applicant found to be a drug abuser. Recommended Level III treatment.

870831:  NAVDRUGLAB, Oakland, CA reports applicant's urine received 870817, tested positive for THC
870923:  Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse.
870923:          Applicant advised of his rights and having consulted with counsel certified under UCMJ Article 27B, elected to waive all rights except the right to obtain copies of the documents used to support the basis for the separation.
870923:  Commanding officer recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse (use). Commanding officer’s comments (verbatim): SNM tested positive for THC in a random urinalysis on 5Jan87. SNM was given a P. 13 warning on 30Jan87 and was put on a 2 by 2 urinalysis program through April 87. However, when terminated from the 2 by 2 program SNM began to abuse marijuana again. SNM violated trust placed in him for access to sensitive material as a radioman. SNM has shown a flagrant disregard of the U.S. Navy's drug abuse policy which reflects his unwillingness to conform to naval rules and regulations. As a second time offender of the Navy's zero tolerance drug policy SNM does not qualify for retention. However SNM is recommended for VA treatment after discharge per Med officer's level III treatment recommendation. As a deployed unit retention of SNM will cause serious administrative and disciplinary problems for this command. Owing to the seriousness of his offenses SNM is recommended for discharge under other than honorable conditions....

871005:  CNMPC directed the applicant's discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse (use).

871010:  Applicant accepted VA treatment.

871026:  Applicant declined in-patient VA treatment.

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW

Discussion

The applicant was discharged on 871028 under other than honorable conditions for misconduct due to drug abuse (use) (A). The Board presumed regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs (B). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).

In the applicant’s issue 1, the Board found that the applicant had a positive urinalysis for THC on 2 separate occasions, which he knew to be in violation of the UCMJ. Although the applicant may feel he is a “good person” and “worthy of an upgrade,” his actions while in the service make him deserving of an other than honorable discharge. No relief will be granted based on this issue.

There is no law or regulation that provides for the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge based solely on the passage of time, or good conduct in the civilian life subsequent to leaving the Service. However, the Board is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge (D). Those factors include, but are not limited to, the following: evidence of continuing educational pursuits (transcripts, diplomas, degrees, vocational-technical certificates), a verifiable employment record (Letter of Recommendation from boss), documentation of community service (letter from the activity/community group), certification of non-involvement with civil authorities (police records check) and proof of his not using drugs (detoxification certificate, AA meeting attendance or letter documenting participation in the program) in order for consideration for clemency based on post-service conduct. At this time, the applicant has not provided any documentation of good character and conduct. Therefore no relief will be granted. The applicant is encouraged to continue with his pursuits and is reminded that he is eligible for a personal appearance hearing provided the application is received within 15-years from the date of discharge.

 Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)

 A. Navy Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560A), effective 15 Jun 87 until
10 Jan 89, Article 3630620, SEPARATION OF ENLISTED MEMBERS BY REASON OF MISCONDUCT DUE TO DRUG ABUSE

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 2, AUTHORITY/POLICY FOR DEPARTMENTAL DISCHARGE REVIEW.

C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.2, PROPRIETY OF THE DISCHARGE.

D. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.3, EQUITY OF THE DISCHARGE.

PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at " afls14.jag.af.mil ".

The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                  Naval Council of Personnel Boards
                  Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                  720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                  Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023      


Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00528

    Original file (ND00-00528.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events : 831116: Applicant briefed on Navy's policy on drugs and alcohol abuse.840820: Counseling: Advised of deficiency (Alcohol abuse-first incident).840822: NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 134 (2 specs): Drunk and disorderly. Impression: Alcohol: Has been alcohol abuse, not a problem drinker, is an alcohol abuser, is not psychologically or physically dependent/addicted to alcohol.850716: Medical evaluation for drug abuse found the applicant...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00773

    Original file (ND00-00773.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND00-00773 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 000605, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. Officers of the Naval Discharge Review Board; I am respectfully submitting this request to have my Discharge upgraded from Other Than Honorable to General Under Honorable Conditions. Again on 84Jan13, SNM was warned and counseled about her misconduct with a third page 13 counseling/warning...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-01009

    Original file (ND04-01009.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND04-01009 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20040608. On 910117, CAAC was notified that SNM had tested positive for THC on a urinalysis conducted prior to the screening. Applicant did not object to separation.910321: Drug and Alcohol Abuse Report: During a random drug test, the Applicant tested positive for abuse of marijuana on or about 901219 ashore-off duty.

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-00113

    Original file (ND99-00113.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND99-00113 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 981027, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable or general/under honorable conditions. Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events : 840217: Waiver granted for use of cocaine in last year.840924: Applicant signed USN Alcohol and drug abuse screening certificate. No indication of appeal in the record.870619: Medical evaluation for drug abuse found the...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00706

    Original file (ND00-00706.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).The applicant’s issue states: “I request the Board to review my O.T.H in 1987 in light of my supporting letter s and previous service time (82-86 Honorable). My discharge in 1987 was based on a non-reoccurring incident and since I've become a hard working church going individual.” The NDRB considered the applicant’s...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00044

    Original file (ND00-00044.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND00-00044 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 991018, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to Honorable and the reason for the discharge be changed to issues. Furthermore, RMSA (applicant) claimed to not know what she had smoked. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).In the...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-00730

    Original file (ND02-00730.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Please help me Review Board with a Second Change. Commanding Officer recommended separate from service.880623: Commanding Officer recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse (use).Commanding Officer’s comments (verbatim): [SNM signed page 13 counseling him on the Navy's policy toward drug abuse 27Apr 87. After a complete review of the record, including the evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board determined that the...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-00112

    Original file (ND03-00112.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:None PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Inactive: None Active: None Period of Service Under Review :Date of Enlistment: 19871009 Date of Discharge: 19890616 Length of Service (years, months, days):Active: 00 09 24 Inactive: 00 10 13 PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-01055

    Original file (ND01-01055.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The discharge shall remain: UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/Misconduct – Drug abuse (Use), authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 3630620. Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:None PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Active: USN None Inactive: USNR (DEP) 870130 - 870224 COG Period of Service Under Review :Date of Enlistment: 870225 Date of...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-00298

    Original file (ND01-00298.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After a thorough review of the records, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).In response to the applicant’s issue, the Board found that the applicant's age, education level, and test scores qualified him for enlistment. At this time, the applicant has not provided any documentation of good character and conduct. Navy Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560A), Change 6, effective 11 Jan 89 until 13 Jun 90,...