Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-01033
Original file (ND00-01033.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

ex-AEAR, USNR
Docket No. ND00-01033

Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review, received 000911, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. The applicant requested a documentary record discharge review. The applicant did not designate a representative on the DD Form 293.

Decision

A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 010301. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, NDRB discerned no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the applicant’s service. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the character of the discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain: UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/ Misconduct – Drug abuse (Use), authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 3630620.

PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION

Issues
1. During my mast hearing I brought up the fact that my spouse had indulged in marijuana use. I, as a result, came up positive for the urine test. After reviewing the Federal Drug testing manual, and based on the type of test used at that time, I feel that passive inhalation was the cause of the positive result. I was not using marijuana.

 Documentation
Only the military service and medical records were reviewed, as the applicant did not provide additional documentation by the Board to consider.

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Active: None
         Inactive: None

 Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 850828               Date of Discharge: 880318

 Length of Service (years, months, days):

         Active: 01 07 27
         Inactive: 00 02 23

 Age at Entry: 17(parental consent)        Years Contracted: 8

 Education Level: 11                        AFQT: 52

 Highest Rate: AEAA

 Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):

 Performance: 3.4 (2)     Behavior: 2.9 (2)                 OTA: 3.51

 Military Decorations: None

 Unit/Campaign/Service Awards: None

 Days of Unauthorized Absence: None

Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):

UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/Misconduct – Drug abuse (Use), authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 3630620.

 Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

850815:  Acknowledged understanding of the Navy's Alcohol and Drug Abuse policy.
860722:  Commenced 36 months active duty under the Active Mariner Program.

 871222:  NAVDRUGLAB, Norfolk, VA report: Urinalysis testing resulted in positive for marijuana.
880105:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 112a: wrongful use of a controlled substance; violation of UCMJ Article 86: unauthorized absence.
Award: Forfeiture of ½ pay per month for 2 months, restriction for 30 days, reduction to E-1. No indication of appeal in the record.

 880203:  Medical evaluation for drug abuse found the applicant to be a recreational substance abuser, not drug dependent. Will ok CAAC if squadron requests.
880211:  Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse as evidenced by non judicial punishment for wrongful use of marijuana as evidenced by a positive urinalysis test during your tour of duty with this command.
880211:  Applicant advised of his rights and having elected not to consult with counsel certified under UCMJ Article 27B, elected to waive all rights except the right to obtain copies of the documents used to support the basis for the separation.
880216:  Commanding officer recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse (use). Commanding officer’s comments: "Administrative Separation of Airman (Applicant) by reason of Misconduct - Drug Abuse is requested as a result of his wrongful use of controlled substance. At his mast proceeding on 5 January 1988, AR (Applicant) freely admitted having smoked marijuana with civilian acquaintances and could not guarantee that he would refrain from future indulgences.
         Since joining this command in August 1987, Airman (Applicant) has not been a functional contributor to the squadron. He lacks the level of enthusiasm, responsibility, and dependability that is common among his peers. Despite his acknowledged awareness of the Navy's substance abuse policy, (NAVPERS 1070/613, 25 July 86), his past involvement in drug use and refusal to refrain from future involvement represent a blatant disrespect for and obvious breach of Navy standards of conduct. As this individual shows no potential for future use to the U.S. Naval Service, this command gives its strongest recommendation for Administrative Separation with an Other Than Honorable characterization."

880304:  BUPERS directed the applicant's discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse (use).

 PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW

Discussion

The applicant was discharged on 880318 under other than honorable conditions for misconduct due to drug abuse (use) (A). The Board presumed regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs (B). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).

 The applicant’s issue states: “During my mast hearing I brought up the fact that my spouse had indulged in marijuana use. I, as a result, came up positive for the urine test. After reviewing the Federal Drug testing manual, and based on the type of test used at that time, I feel that passive inhalation was the cause of the positive result. I was not using marijuana.” The Board found a conflicting statement in the applicant’s service record written by his commanding officer at the time of discharge that stated: “… At his mast proceeding on 5 January 1988, AR (Applicant) freely admitted having smoked marijuana with civilian acquaintances and could not guarantee that he would refrain from future indulgences.” The Board found the applicant’s issue lacked creditability. Relief is not warranted.


Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)

 A. Navy Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560A), effective 15 Jun 87 until
10 Jan 89, Article 3630620, SEPARATION OF ENLISTED MEMBERS BY REASON OF MISCONDUCT DUE TO DRUG ABUSE

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 2, AUTHORITY/POLICY FOR DEPARTMENTAL DISCHARGE REVIEW.

C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.2, PROPRIETY OF THE DISCHARGE.

D. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.3, EQUITY OF THE DISCHARGE.


PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at " afls14.jag.af.mil ".

The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                  Naval Council of Personnel Boards
                  Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                  720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                  Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023      


Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-00791

    Original file (ND02-00791.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND02-00791 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 020513, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Letter of Recommendation from LCdr T_ P. S_ USN, dated 24Sept1997 Copy of Character Witness Statement from D_ D. A_ JOC (SW/AW), USNdated 1June1997 Copy of Character Witness Statement from...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-00688

    Original file (ND03-00688.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. Decision A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 20040408. Navy Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560A), effective 15 Jun 87 until 10 Jan 89, Article 3630620, SEPARATION OF ENLISTED MEMBERS BY REASON OF MISCONDUCT DUE TO DRUG ABUSE B.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-00066

    Original file (ND03-00066.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND03-00066 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 20021010, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable or general/under honorable conditions. PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The Applicant was discharged on 880229 under other than honorable conditions for misconduct due to drug abuse (use) (A). Verifiable proof of any post-service accomplishments must be provided in order for...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-00980

    Original file (ND02-00980.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    No indication of appeal in the record.000317: Commanding Officer recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse (use). Given the Navy’s zero-tolerance drug policy, it is necessary that AOAR C_ (Applicant) be separated with an Other Than Honorable characterization of service as quickly as possible.] After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-01327

    Original file (ND02-01327.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND02-01327 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 20020917, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. 871214: Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse rehabilitation failure as evidenced by two positive urinalysis tests while on 4X6 urinalysis aftercare program; and misconduct due to drug abuse as evidenced by service...

  • USMC | DRB | 2002_Marine | MD02-00973

    Original file (MD02-00973.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After a review of the Former Service Members (FSM) DD Form 293 Application for the Naval Discharge Review Board of Discharge of Dismissal from the Armed Forces of the United States and all of the evidence assembled for review, we continue to support the contentions as set forth by the Applicant, in his request that he be given the opportunity to upgrade his (Under Other Than Honorable Conditions) Discharge to a (General Discharge Under Conditions) Discharge. The (FSM) after returning from...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-01336

    Original file (ND03-01336.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant is currently non-dependent on alcohol/drugs. 890222: An Administrative Discharge Board, based upon a preponderance of the evidence and by unanimous vote, found that the Applicant had committed misconduct due to wrongful possession, distribution, and use of marijuana, a controlled substance, that the misconduct warranted separation, and recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions.890302: NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 86: Unauthorized absence from 0700-0723,...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00456

    Original file (ND00-00456.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    871001: NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 112a: wrongful us of marijuana, a controlled substance, on or about 19 SEP 97. PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The applicant was discharged on 871029 with a General (Under Honorable Conditions) for misconduct due to drug abuse (use) (A). After review of the applicant’s service record the Board found the applicant’s ten months active service was marred by three separate NJP’s.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00556

    Original file (ND00-00556.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    I (applicant) was released from military service with an other than honorable due to drug test. No indication of appeal in the record.880519: Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse as evidenced by your wrongful use of cocaine.880519: Applicant advised of his rights and having elected not to consult with counsel certified under UCMJ Article 27B, elected to waive all rights.880523: Commanding...

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-00217

    Original file (ND99-00217.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Because of his continued drug use and abuse and his refusal to seek rehabilitation he has my strongest recommendation for an other than honorable discharge. After a thorough review of the records, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).In the response to applicant’s issues 1 and 2, the applicant implies that a permissive doctrine exists whereby one in the military is allowed a "single misdeed". Navy Military...