Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00934
Original file (ND00-00934.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT


ex-ACAR, USN
Docket No. ND00-00934

Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review, received 000719, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. The applicant requested a documentary record discharge review. The applicant did not list any representative on the DD Form 293.

Decision

A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 010201. After a thorough review of the records, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, NDRB discerned no impropriety but did discern inequity in the characterization of the applicant’s service. The Board’s vote was three to two that the character of the discharge shall change. The discharge shall change to: GENERAL (UNDER HONORABLE CONDITIONS)/Misconduct – commission of a serious offense, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 3630600.




PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION


Issues (verbatim)

1. Since the date of my discharge I never felt I should have been given a less than honorable discharge. The only thing I stated at my Captain's Mast hearing was that I wanted out of the Navy. I was an Air Traffic Controller on Board U.S.S. SARATOGA. After arriving on Board I noticed in my own opinion, that minorities were not being equally treated in the Air Ops Division. The Navy spent a lot of money sending me to ATC "A" School and the only good I saw from my school training was cleaning a head, mopping a deck, painting and the list goes on. The job I signed on to do in my own opinion, would have never materialized so long as I was stationed on the SARATOGA. It was also brought to my attention that after my discharge, an investigation took place within the Air Ops Division to check the trading methods in the CATCC office. I understand that my discharge was an attempt to make me out of the CATCC office. Now that it's approaching 8 years since my separation, I respectfully request that my discharge be upgraded to Honorable. I understand that with an upgraded certain avenues and door could possible open for me and my family. Your consideration in matter would greatly be appreciated. Thank you.

 Documentation
In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:
Copy of DD Form 214

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Active: None
          Inactive: USNR (DEP)     890724 - 900715  COG
Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 900716               Date of Discharge: 920914

 Length of Service (years, months, days):
         Active: 02 01 29
          Inactive: None
Age at Entry: 18                          Years Contracted: 4

 Education Level: 12                        AFQT: 62
Highest Rate: ACAA

 Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):
Performance: 3.00 (1)    Behavior: 3.20 (1)                OTA : 2.80

 Military Decorations: None
Unit/Campaign/Service Awards: NDSM

Days of Unauthorized Absence: None
Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):

UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/Misconduct – commission of a serious offense, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 3630600.
Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

900717:  Applicant briefed on Navy's policy on drug and alcohol abuse.
911031:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 92 (3 specs): (1) Failure to obey a lawful order, to wit: wrongful possession of alcohol in barracks, (2) violation of a lawful written order by wrongfully consuming alcohol underage, (3) Violated a lawful regulation by wrongfully allowing unauthorized personnel (female) into the barracks.
         Award: Forfeiture of $376 per month for 2 months, restriction and extra duty for 30 days, reduction to ACAR. Forfeiture for 1 month and restriction and extra duty suspended for 6 months). No indication of appeal in the record.
920805:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 92: Fail to obey a lawful order by failing to attend physical fitness training on 29 June 1992, 3, 6, 8, 10, 20 and 22 July 1992.
         Award: Forfeiture of $250 per month for 2 months, restriction for 30 days. Forfeiture suspended for 6 months. No indication of appeal in the record.
920805:  Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to the commission of a serious offense.
920805:          Applicant advised of his rights and having elected not to consult with counsel certified under UCMJ Article 27B, elected to waive all rights except the right to obtain copies of the documents used to support the basis for the separation.
920816:  Medical officer evaluation: Applicant found not chemically dependent. [Date extracted from CO's message dated August 18, 1992.]
920818:  Commanding officer recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to the commission of a serious offense.

920901:  BUPERS directed the applicant's discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to the commission of a serious offense.

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT
REGULATION/LAW

Discussion

The applicant was discharged on 920914 under other than honorable conditions for misconduct due to commission of a serious offense (A and B). The Board presumed regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs (C). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper but inequitable (D and E).
In response to the applicant’s issue, the Board thoroughly reviewed the applicant’s service record, NJP’s, and performance evaluation average. The Board determined that, in accordance with SECNAVINST 5420.174C, Chapter 9, Section 9.3, there is substantial doubt that the applicant would have received the same discharge, if relevant current policies and procedures had been available to the applicant at the time of the discharge proceedings under consideration. Accordingly, the Board voted to grant relief in the form of an upgrade of characterization to general (under honorable conditions). The applicant’s misconduct of record does not support an upgrade to fully honorable.
The following is provided for the applicant’s edification. The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge (E). The applicant must be aware that there is no law or regulation which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time, or good conduct in the civilian life subsequent to leaving the service. Normally, to permit relief, an error or injustice must have been found to have existed during the period of enlistment in question. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent that such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, may be considered by the NDRB. The applicant is reminded that he is still eligible for a personal appearance hearing provided the application is received within 15 years from the date of discharge. Representation at personal appearance hearing is highly recommended.

Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)
A. Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), effective 15 Aug 91 until
04 Mar 93, Article 3630600, SEPARATION OF ENLISTED PERSONNEL BY REASON OF MISCONDUCT – COMMISSION OF A SERIOUS OFFENSE.
B. Under the Manual for Courts-Martial, a punitive discharge is authorized for violation of the Uniform Code of Military Justice, Article 92, for failure to obey a lawful order, if adjudged at a Special or General Court-Martial.
C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 2, AUTHORITY/POLICY FOR DEPARTMENTAL DISCHARGE REVIEW.

D. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.2, PROPRIETY OF THE DISCHARGE.
E. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.3, EQUITY OF THE DISCHARGE.

PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at " afls14.jag.af.mil ".

 The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                  Naval Council of Personnel Boards
                  Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                  720 Kennon Street SE RM 309
                  Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023      


Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-00211

    Original file (ND02-00211.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:None PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Active: None Inactive: None Period of Service Under Review :Date of Enlistment: 890421 Date of Discharge: 920925 Length of Service (years, months, days):Active: 03 02 21 Does not exclude time lost. ]920810: Commanding Officer recommended discharge under other than...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-00405

    Original file (ND04-00405.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND04-00405 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20040115. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at " afls14.jag.af.mil ".The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-01241

    Original file (ND03-01241.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. The Applicant requests a documentary record review. The Applicant’s conduct, which forms the primary basis for determining the character of his service, reflects his willful failure to meet the requirements of his contract with the U.S. Navy and falls far short of that required for an upgrade of his characterization of service.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-00331

    Original file (ND02-00331.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND02-00331 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 020129, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. The Applicant requested a documentary record discharge review. Documentation Only the service and medical records were reviewed, as the Applicant did not provide additional documentation for the Board to consider.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-00671

    Original file (ND04-00671.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    “Dear DRB, The following issues are the reasons I believe my discharge should be upgraded to Honorable, General Discharge under Honorable Conditions or Discharge for The Convenience of the Government from Discharge for Pattern of Misconduct. 900427: Applicant’s charge of unauthorized absence for the dates of 900404-900405 was dismissed. The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received, at the NDRB, within 15 years from the date of discharge.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-01136

    Original file (ND03-01136.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. The Applicant’s conduct, which forms the primary basis for determining the character of his service, falls short of that required for a general (under honorable) characterization of service. Verifiable proof of any post-service accomplishments must be provided in order for the Applicant to claim post-service conduct and behavior as a reason to upgrade a...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-00885

    Original file (ND04-00885.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION Issues, as stated Issues submitted by Applicant’s counsel (National Military Justice Group) at the time of the Applicant’s personal appearance hearing supersede those submitted originally on Form DD-293.“Issue 1. 920805: NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 92 (Failure to obey, 7 specifications): Failing to attend physical training on 920629, 920703, 920706, 920708, 920710, 920720, and 920722.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-00090

    Original file (ND01-00090.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:None PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Active: None Inactive: USNR (DEP) 891208 - 900731 COG Period of Service Under Review :Date of Enlistment: 900801 Date of Discharge: 920928 Length of Service (years, months, days):Active: 02 01 28 Inactive: None 920914: BUPERS directed the applicant's discharge...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-00976

    Original file (ND01-00976.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The discharge shall remain: UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/Misconduct – commission of a serious offense, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 3630600. Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:Copy of DD Form 214 PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Active: USN 880614 - 900408 HON Inactive: USNR (DEP) 880608 - 880613 COG Period of Service...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-01508

    Original file (ND03-01508.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND03-01508 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20030917. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. Applicant)(Social security number deleted)” Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Copy of DD Form 214 8 pages from Applicant’s service record PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service...