Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00662
Original file (ND00-00662.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

ex-HN, USN
Docket No. ND00-00662

Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review, received 000424, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions and the reason for the discharge be changed to Convenience of Govt. RE-1. The applicant requested a documentary record discharge review. The applicant did not list any representative on the DD Form 293.

Decision

A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 001206. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, NDRB discerned no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the applicant’s service. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the character of the discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain: UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/MISCONDUCT, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 3630620.

PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION

Issues (verbatim)

1. Dear D.R.B,

The following issues are reasons that I believe my discharge should be upgraded to Honorable. The presumption of regularity that might normally allow you to assume that the U.S Navy acted correctly in characterizing my service as other than honorable does not apply to my case, based on the issues evidence that I am submitting. My conduct and service during the first 3 years nine months of my enlistment, was above average (exemplary), resulting in consistent 3.8 - 4.0 evals, Letters of Commendation for jobs well done (Recruit Chief Petty Officer: Basic Trng., Class Adjutant: Hosp. Corps School), Letters of Recommendation (recommended highly by Senior Officers for special warfare and other specialized training) misc. Awards and Certificates for Physical Fitness and other participatory activities. In addition to the above, my record of rapid advancement/promotions reflects that I was an exemplary service member. This is supported by numerous favorable comments on my personnel evaluations. After departing special warfare training due to persistent injuries and marital problems) had a abbreviated but successful (voluntary) tour with the 1 st MARDIV. Including but not limited to volunteering for every rigorous assignment possible, volunteering for and successfully completing the USMC Force Recon Qualifier test, typically completing all combat medic oriented courses at or near the top of my classes. My N.J.P was conducted by a Lt.Col M_ (then Commanding Officer 1 st MarDiv / 1 st Battalion , 5 th Marines in '94 ). I explained to him the circumstances surrounding my incident and the "one time" nature of the incident), and made it very clear that although full responsiblity and accountability were mine and mine alone, the incident was in no way a reflection of my true character. Upon hearing my statement and after review of my service record, LtCol M_ expressed his opinion that my one time incident of misconduct should in no way effect the character of my discharge or warrant a other than honorable discharge prior to my EAOS. He then said that he was required to "award" me with something, so I was awarded a reduction in rate and fined some $ x 2 months. I was not awarded a discharge of any kind, and the LtCol even made a point of saying that he didn't want to effect my discharge status based on this one time incident. There was no Other than Honorable discharge awarded to me at my NJP . Lastly, on a personal note: I am extremely proud of my military service, my time in SEAL training, my work with a variety of USMC spec-ops units, and the extensive medical training that received in the Navy. While in the Navy, I seized every opportunity that I could to better myself, challenge myself, and serve my country with an emphasis on volunteering for evolutions that no one else wanted. I feel that for my service to be characterized as anything other than honorable is not doing my service justice. With the above issues in mind , I respectfully request that my discharge status be upgraded to a discharge under Honorable conditions with an RE-1 code.
Documentation
In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:
Copy of DD Form 214
Statement from applicant
Ten pages from applicant's service record

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Active: None
         Inactive: USNR (DEP)     900515 - 900809  COG

 Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 900810               Date of Discharge: 941021

 Length of Service (years, months, days):

         Active: 04 02 12
         Inactive: None

 Age at Entry: 23                          Years Contracted: 4 (3 months extension)

 Education Level: 16                        AFQT: 91

 Highest Rate: HM3

 Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):

 Performance: 3.74 (7)    Behavior: 3.74 (7)                OTA: 3.83

 Military Decorations: None

 Unit/Campaign/Service Awards: NDSM, MUC

 Days of Unauthorized Absence: None

 Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):

UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/MISCONDUCT, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 3630620.

 Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

900816:  Applicant briefed on Navy's policy on drug and alcohol abuse.

 940523:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 112A: Wrongfully use marijuana between 23Feb94 and 2Mar94, to wit: tested positive for THC in urine sample batch number B-641 specimen #11.
         Award: Forfeiture of $500 per month for 2 months, restriction and extra duty for 45 days, reduction to HN. Restriction and extra duty suspended for 6 months. No indication of appeal in the record.
940612:  Medical evaluation for drug abuse found the applicant to be a drug abuser, not drug dependent.

940705:  Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse.
950705:          Applicant advised of his rights and having consulted with counsel certified under UCMJ Article 27B, elected to waive all rights except the right to obtain copies of the documents used to support the basis for the separation.
940720:  Commanding officer recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse (use). Commanding officer’s comments (verbatim): HN (applicant) transferred to this command on 940606 as a non-deployable corpsman from Battalion Landing Team 3/5 due to a pending legal action for a positive urinalysis for THC. HN (applicant's) efforts under the direct supervision of the BAS staff has been acceptable; however, his behavior off duty indicates serious deficiencies in judgement, loyalty, maturity, and trustworthiness. His continued service is contrary to the good order and discipline of this unit and the United States Navy. My recommendation is that HN (applicant) be administratively separated from the United States Navy based on his use of an illegal drug. I strongly recommend the characterization of his discharge be under other than honorable conditions.

940802:  SJA review determined the case sufficient in law and fact.

940907:  BUPERS directed the applicant's discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse (use).

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT
REGULATION/LAW

Discussion

The applicant was discharged on 941021 under other than honorable conditions for misconduct due to drug abuse (use) (A). The Board presumed regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs (B). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).

In response to the applicant’s issue, the Board found, concerning the applicant’s request for a change in the reason for discharge, that the summary of service clearly documents that drug abuse was the reason the applicant was discharged. No other Narrative Reason for Separation could more clearly describe why the applicant was discharged. To change the Narrative Reason for Separation would be inappropriate.

Concerning the applicant’s request for an upgrade to his discharge, the applicant implies that a permissive doctrine exists whereby one in the military is allowed a "one time incident". The Board believes that the applicant is confusing this with the civilian world wherein some offenses are treated with leniency because they are a first time incident on an otherwise clear record. No such leniency exists in the military especially concerning drug abuse. The Navy has long had a ‘zero tolerance’ policy toward members who abuse illegal substances. Even though the applicant’s performance of duty while in the service has been noteworthy, the applicant is responsible for his actions and must accept the consequences of his misdeeds. The Board will not grant relief on the basis of this issue. Relief denied.

 The applicant is reminded that he remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing provided the application is received within 15 years from the date of discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is highly recommended. The possibility of favorable action in the applicant’s case will increase with the amount of time he maintains an alcohol and drug free lifestyle. Verifiable documentation of such a lifestyle is essential. The applicant is encouraged to continue his community service, remain sober, and apply for a personal appearance hearing prior to 21 October 2009.

Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)

 A . Navy Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 9/94, effective
22 Jul 94 until 02 Oct 96, Article 3630620, SEPARATION OF ENLISTED MEMBERS BY REASON OF MISCONDUCT DUE TO DRUG ABUSE
B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 2, AUTHORITY/POLICY FOR DEPARTMENTAL DISCHARGE REVIEW.

C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.2, PROPRIETY OF THE DISCHARGE.

D. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.3, EQUITY OF THE DISCHARGE.

PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at " afls14.jag.af.mil ".

The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                  Naval Council of Personnel Boards
                  Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                  720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                  Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023      


Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-01191

    Original file (ND01-01191.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    No indication of appeal in the record.961216: Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse and that the least favorable characterization of service may be under other than honorable conditions.961218: Applicant advised of his rights and having consulted with counsel certified under UCMJ Article 27B, elected to appear before an Administrative Discharge Board.970107: Commanding officer recommended to the Senior Member of the...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-00143

    Original file (ND04-00143.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Certificate from Phi Theta Kappa, dated October 6, 2002 The National Dean’s List certificate, dated 2002-2003 Article written by Applicant and P_ I_, MD Applicant’s DD Form 214 (Member 1 and 4) PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component,...

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-01181

    Original file (ND99-01181.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:None PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Active: None Inactive: USNR (DEP) 910819 - 920204 COG Period of Service Under Review :Date of Enlistment: 920205 Date of Discharge: 960419 Length of Service (years, months, days):Active: 04 00 15 Inactive: None PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT...

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-00717

    Original file (ND99-00717.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION Issues (verbatim) The FSM was discharged from active Naval service on August 7, 1997, due to improper use of a controlled substance. Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:DAV issues letter Copy of DD Form 214 Copy of previous DD Form 214 Letter from applicant (2pgs) Letter of reference from wife (2pgs) Letter of reference from mother Copy of Associate...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00880

    Original file (ND00-00880.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:Police Record Check Employment Reference Letter PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Active: USN 890920 - 940403 HON Inactive: USNR (DEP) 890912 - 890919 COG Period of Service Under Review :Date of Enlistment: 940404 Date of Discharge: 941123 Length of Service (years, months, days):Active: 00 10...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00311

    Original file (ND00-00311.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Age at Entry: 19 Years Contracted: 4 Education Level: 12 AFQT: 51 Highest Rate: HN Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks): Performance: 3.75 (4) Behavior: 3.85 (4) OTA: 3 .95 Military Decorations: None Unit/Campaign/Service Awards: NDSM Days of Unauthorized Absence: None Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/MISCONDUCT, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 3630620. Navy Military Personnel...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-01072

    Original file (ND00-01072.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    My discharge was inequitable because it was based on one isolated incident in 67 months of outstanding performance of service, as my enlisted service record indicate. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).The applicant states in issue 1 that his “discharge is inequitable because it was based on one isolated incident.” The Board found that the applicant...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-01020

    Original file (ND00-01020.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEWDECISIONAL DOCUMENT ex-HN, USN Docket No. ND00-01020 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 000831, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable and the reason for the discharge be changed to Convenience of the Government RE-1 Reenlistment Code. The applicant’s issues three through eight state reasons why his length of service, patriotism, esteem...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-00375

    Original file (ND01-00375.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND01-00375 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 010206, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:Letter from applicant PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Active: USN None Inactive:...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-00057

    Original file (ND02-00057.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    To: Navy Discharge Review Board, I am honorably requesting an upgrade in my discharge status. 950328: An Administrative Discharge Board, based upon a preponderance of the evidence and by unanimous vote, found that the applicant had committed misconduct due to drug abuse, that the misconduct warranted separation, and by a vote of 2 to 1, recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions. Despite the applicant’s excellent performance evaluations, her drug abuse warranted processing...