Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00501
Original file (ND00-00501.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT


ex-ATAN, USN
Docket No. ND00-00501

Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review, received 000308, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. The applicant requested a documentary record discharge review. The applicant did not list any representative on the DD Form 293.

Decision

A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 000928. After a thorough review of the records, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, NDRB discerned no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the applicant’s service. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the character of the discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain: UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/MISCONDUCT, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 3630620.

PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION


Issues (verbatim)

1. I believe that my discharge was inequitable because it was based solely on an incident that is untrue to my character. I accept responsibility for my actions, but feel that an other than honorable discharge is harsh and unfair. My 2 years prior to my mistake in the Navy better represent my character.
2. I am about to graduate college with a degree in environmental science. I have worked hard to make it through school after losing my G.I. bill money because of my mistake. I regret not being able to finish my commitment to the Navy, and hope that the Department of Defense will reconsider my discharge, and help me to succeed in the civilian world.

Documentation
In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:
None

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Active: None
          Inactive: USNR (DEP)     941230 - 950410  COG

 Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 950411               Date of Discharge: 971030

 Length of Service (years, months, days):
         Active: 02 06 20
          Inactive: None
Age at Entry: 23                          Years Contracted: 4
Education Level: 12                        AFQT: 64

 Highest Rate: ATAN
Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):

 Performance: 3.67 (      3)       Behavior: 3.33 (3)                OTA: 3.22
Military Decorations: None

 Unit/Campaign/Service Awards: NDSM, AFEM, AFSM
Days of Unauthorized Absence: None

 Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):

UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/MISCONDUCT, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 3630620.

 Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

950911:  Civil Conviction: General Sessions Criminal Division 8, Memphis, TN for violation of disorderly conduct.
 Sentence: Fined $50.00 and court cost of $146.75.
970526:  Arrest/Notice to Appear: Applicant arrested 0819, 26May97 for possession of schedule II drug (less than 20 grams of marijuana and glass pipe and two unknown type of pills (later identified as 1 Diazapram 10mg and 1 Alprazolam 1mg both schedule 4).
970609:  NAVDRUGLAB, Jacksonville, FL reports applicant's urine sample received 970529 tested positive for THC.
970717:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 112A: Wrongful use of marijuana.
Award: Forfeiture 1/2 months pay for 2 months, restriction and extra duty for 45 days, reduction to ATAA. All punishments suspended for 6 months. No indication of appeal in the record.
970730:  Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse as evidenced by your CO's nonjudicial punishment on 17 July 1997, Article 112A, wrongful use of marijuana.
970730:          Applicant advised of his rights and having consulted with counsel certified under UCMJ Article 27B, elected to appear before an Administrative Discharge Board. Applicant's statement can be found in service record.
970819:  An Administrative Discharge Board, based upon a preponderance of the evidence and by unanimous vote, found that the applicant had committed misconduct due to drug abuse, that the misconduct warranted separation, and recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions.
970911:  Drug and Alcohol Abuse Report: Marijuana abuse, 970910, 1 to 3 times per month, ashore off duty. Random urinalysis. Physician found applicant not dependent and recommended separate not via VA hospital. Commanding Officer recommended separate not via VA hospital.
970917:  DAPA drug and/or alcohol dependency evaluation: Applicant found to be a drug experimenter not drug dependent and recommended for separation not via VA hospital.
971007:  Commanding officer recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse (use).


Partial discharge package missing.

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT
REGULATION/LAW

Discussion

The applicant was discharged on 971030 under other than honorable conditions for misconduct due to drug abuse (use) (A). The Board presumed regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs (B). After a thorough review of the records, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).
In issue 1, the applicant states that his “ 2 years prior to my mistake in the Navy better represent my character.” T he applicant implies that a permissive doctrine exists whereby one in the military is allowed a single misdeed. The Board believes that the applicant is confusing this with the civilian world wherein some offenses are treated with leniency because they are a first time incident on an otherwise clear record. No such leniency exists in the military. The applicant is responsible for his actions and must accept the consequences of his misdeeds. The Board will not grant relief on the basis of this issue.
In response to applicant’s issue 2, outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent that such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, can be considered. In determining whether a case merits a change based on post-service conduct, the NDRB considers the length of time since discharge, the applicant's record of community service, employment, conduct, educational achievements, and family relationships. In reviewing the applicant’s post service, the Board was impressed with the educational efforts he has begun to make in attempting to recoup his reputation which has been sullied by his misconduct in the Navy. However, the applicant’s efforts need to be more encompassing than those provided. NDRB experience has shown that applicants with less than five years post-service usually have not had sufficient opportunity to demonstrate continuing, positive contributions to society. Therefore, relief will not be granted at this time. The applicant is reminded that he remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing provided the application is received within 15 years from the date of discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is highly recommended. The possibility of favorable action in the applicant’s case will increase with the amount of time he maintains an alcohol and drug free lifestyle. Verifiable documentation of such a lifestyle is essential. The applicant is encouraged to continue his community service, remain sober, and apply for a personal appearance hearing prior to 30 October, 2012.

Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)
A . Navy Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 14, effective
03 Oct 96 until 11 Dec 97, Article 3630620 SEPARATION OF ENLISTED PERSONNEL BY REASON OF MISCONDUCT DRUG ABUSE
B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 2, AUTHORITY/POLICY FOR DEPARTMENTAL DISCHARGE REVIEW.

C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.2, PROPRIETY OF THE DISCHARGE.

D. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.3, EQUITY OF THE DISCHARGE.

PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at " afls14.jag.af.mil ".

 The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                  Naval Council of Personnel Boards
                  Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                  720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                  Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023      


Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-00081

    Original file (ND99-00081.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND99-00081 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 981020 requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to under Honorable conditions (General). 830207: SAR noted applicant’s possession of marijuana, and medical officer’s dependency evaluation that the applicant was not drug dependent.830617: Counseling: Advised of deficiency (Possession of marijuana at previous command), notified of corrective actions and assistance available, and a...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00402

    Original file (ND00-00402.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:None PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Active: None Inactive: None Period of Service Under Review :Date of Enlistment: 881028 Date of Discharge: 910724 Length of Service (years, months, days): Active: 01 10 20 Inactive: 00 11 06 Age at Entry: 18 Years Contracted: 8 Education Level: 12 AFQT: 39/42 Highest...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00690

    Original file (ND00-00690.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :960405: Medical evaluation for drug abuse found the applicant to be a drug abuser, not drug dependent. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).The applicant states in issue 1 that his “ average conduct and efficiency ratings/behavior and proficiency marks were good” and he “received letters of...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00315

    Original file (ND00-00315.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Decision A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 000928. 900419: Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse as evidenced by your act of illegal or wrongful use or possession of a controlled substance (s) {EXTRACTED FROM CO'S MESSAGE}.900419: Applicant advised of his rights and having elected not to consult with counsel certified under UCMJ Article 27B, elected to...

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-00594

    Original file (ND99-00594.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board believes that the applicant is confusing this with the civilian world wherein some offenses are treated with leniency because they are a first time incident on an otherwise clear record. In response to the applicant’s issues 2, 3, 5,10 the normal characterization for misconduct-drug abuse is other than honorable. In addition to the drug abuse, the applicant was UA for 10 days.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00724

    Original file (ND00-00724.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization based solely on the issue of obtaining veteran’s benefits. At this time, the applicant has not provided any post service documentation of good character and conduct.

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-00904

    Original file (ND99-00904.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:Letter from applicant Copy of Driving Record Copy of Local Arrest Record Response Resume (2pgs) Copy of DD Form 214 Copy of Sailor of the Month Letter Copy of Enlisted Performance Evaluation Report (5) Copy of Enlisted Performance Record Copies from Service Record (5pgs) PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of...

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-01069

    Original file (ND99-01069.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:Resume (2pgs) Copy of DD Form 214 PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Active: USN 840514 - 890814 HON Inactive: USNR (DEP) 840412 - 840514 COG Period of Service Under Review :Date of Enlistment: 890815 Date of Discharge: 910412 Length of Service (years, months, days):Active: 01 07 28 Inactive: None ...

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-01199

    Original file (ND99-01199.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Appealed denied 931104.931105: Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse.931105: Applicant advised of his rights and having consulted with counsel certified under UCMJ Article 27B, elected to appear before an Administrative Discharge Board. PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The applicant was discharged on 940211 under other than honorable conditions for...

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-01106

    Original file (ND99-01106.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).In the applicant’s first issue, he implies that a permissive doctrine exists whereby one in the military is allowed a “single misdeed”. The applicant is asked to read the Navy Personnel Manual, Article 3630620 (A), concerning the standards for a service member discharged due to drug abuse. You may obtain a copy of...