Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00324
Original file (ND00-00324.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

ex-MSSN, USN
Docket No. ND00-00324

Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review, received 000112, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to Honorable. The applicant requested a documentary record discharge review. The applicant listed the American Legion as his representative on the DD Form 293.

Decision

A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 000817. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, NDRB discerned no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the applicant’s service. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the character of the discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain: UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/HOMOSEXUAL ACT, authority: MILPERSMAN, Article 3630400.

PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION

Issues

1. (Equity Issue) This former member avers that the allegations of indecent assault, the basis of his UOTHC discharge, were never proven. Therefore, he opines that recharacterization of his service period to honorable is warranted.

2. (Equity Issue) This former member further requests that the Board include provisions of SECNAVINST 5420.174C., enclosure (1), Chapter 9, as it pertains to post-service conduct, in assessing the merits of his application.

 Documentation
In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:
Copy of DD Form 214
Four pages from applicant's service record

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Active: None
         Inactive: USNR (DEP)     940421 - 940606  COG

 Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 940607               Date of Discharge: 980213

 Length of Service (years, months, days):

         Active: 03 08 07
         Inactive: 00 00 00

 Age at Entry: 24                          Years Contracted: 4

 Education Level: 12                        AFQT: 50

 Highest Rate: MS3

 Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):

 Performance: 3.56 (5)    Behavior: 3.75 (4)                OTA: NMF

 Military Decorations: None

 Unit/Campaign/Service Awards: NDSM, SSDR, SASM with Bronze Star, AFSM, NATO, NER, GCM

 Days of Unauthorized Absence: None

 Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):
UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/HOMOSEXUAL ACT), authority: MILPERSMAN, Article 3630400.

 Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

980116:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 134: Assault - indecent by the touching of a male shipmate's genitals on 13 January 1998.
         Award: Forfeiture of $200.00 per month for 1 month, reduction to MSSN. No indication in the record of appeal.
980122:  Applicant notified of intended recommendation for by reason of homosexuality as evidenced by applicant's statement that he engaged in homosexual acts. Applicant advised, that if separation is approved, the characterization of his service may be under Other Than Honorable conditions. [Extracted from Commanding Officer’s message dated 27JAN98.]
980122:  Applicant advised of his rights and having elected not to consult with counsel certified under UCMJ, Article 27B, elected to waive all rights. [Extracted from Commanding Officer’s message dated 27JAN98.]

980127:  Commanding officer recommended discharge under Honorable conditions (General) by reason of homosexuality as evidenced by his had engaged in homosexual acts. Commanding officer’s comments (verbatim): “On 13 Jan 98, a male crewmember reported to our officer of the deck that another crewmember, MSSN (applicant), had been in the berthing fondling him in the crotch area in a manner which was unmistakably sexual in nature. The crewmember felt that the incident happened three times within a matter of 30 minutes during that night while the assailant thought the crewmember was asleep. When the assaulted crewmember opened his rack curtain, the only person in the vicinity of his rack was MSSN (applicant). During the investigation conducted by my chief master at arms (CMAA), MSSN (applicant) did not admit to the indecent assault, but did state that he felt that he had homosexual tendencies. At no time during the investigation did the CMAA ask MSSN (applicant) if he was homosexual. During questioning by my executive officer, he again denied the indecent assault charge and reiterated that he had homosexual tendencies. I subsequently found him guilty of the indecent assault charge as explained in para 5 above. MSSN (applicant) was part of the precommissioning crew and his performance and record until this event were superb. Based on this performance, I strongly recommend that he be separated with a general characterization of discharge.

980206:  BUPERS directed the applicant's discharge with an under Other Than Honorable conditions by reason of homosexual conduct acts.

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW

Discussion

The applicant was discharged on 980213 with an under Other Than Honorable conditions by reason of homosexuality - homosexual acts (A). The Board presumed regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs (B). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).

In the applicant’s issue 1, the Board determined this issue is without merit. The applicant petitions an equity issue, in that the allegations of indecent assault, the basis of his OTHC discharge, were never proven. During an investigation conducted by the Chief Master At Arms, the applicant did not admit to the indecent assault but did state that he felt he had homosexual tendencies. A statement by a member that demonstrates a propensity or intent to engage in homosexual acts is grounds for separation not because it reflects the member's sexual orientation, but because the statement indicates a likelihood that the member engages in or will engage in homosexual acts. Separation processing is mandatory, if the Commanding Officer believes that, by a preponderance of the evidence, homosexual conduct has occurred. It was the belief of the applicant’s Commanding Officer that there was enough evidence that a homosexual act did occur. The discharge was proper and equitable. Relief denied.

In the applicant’s issue 2, the Board determined this issue is without merit. The applicant petitions an equity issue, in that he requests that the Board consider clemency based on his post-service conduct. The applicant did not provide any documentation to support a claim for post-service clemency. The discharge was proper and equitable. Relief denied.

Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)

 A. The Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C) Change 14, effective
03 Oct 96 until 11 Dec 97, Artic         le 3630400, SEPARATION OF ENLISTED PERSONNEL BY REASON OF HOMOSEXUAL CONDUCT.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 2, AUTHORITY/POLICY FOR DEPARTMENTAL DISCHARGE REVIEW.

C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.2, PROPRIETY OF THE DISCHARGE.

D. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.3, EQUITY OF THE DISCHARGE.

PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ afls14.jag.af.mil ”.

The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                  Naval Council of Personnel Boards
                  Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                  720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                  Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023      


Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-00023

    Original file (ND99-00023.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    950508: An Administrative Discharge Board, based upon a preponderance of the evidence and by unanimous vote, found that the applicant had committed homosexual acts and that such acts warranted separation, and recommended discharge General (under Honorable conditions). PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The applicant was discharged on 950807 with a General (under Honorable conditions) by reason of homosexuality – stated he is a homosexual (A). You...

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-00613

    Original file (ND99-00613.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The separation authority determined that homosexuality most clearly described the reason for discharge. To change the Narrative Reason Separation would be inappropriate.In response to applicant’s issue 3, the Board has no obligation to change the applicant's discharge in order to allow him to obtain better employment You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-00391

    Original file (ND04-00391.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant’s submitted a statement indicating, “I feel the mast itself was done fairly and I was given ample opportunity to speak on my own behalf.” Further, the Applicant waived his right to request an Administrative Board to contest his separation. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any other evidence related to his discharge at that time. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-00266

    Original file (ND02-00266.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Copy of DD Form 214 One hundred and seventy-two pages from Applicant's service record PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Active: None Inactive: USNR (DEP) 950612 - 950802 COG Period of Service Under Review :Date of Enlistment: 950803 Date of Discharge: 970718 Length of Service (years, months,...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-00163

    Original file (ND03-00163.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Please review my service record. 930310: An Administrative Discharge Board, based upon a preponderance of the evidence and by unanimous vote, found that the Applicant had committed homosexual acts and that such acts warranted separation, and misconduct due to commission of a serious offense and recommended discharge under honorable conditions (general). 930324: Commanding Officer recommended discharge under honorable conditions (general) by reason of misconduct due to commission of a...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-00268

    Original file (ND02-00268.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requested a documentary record discharge review. Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:None PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Active: None Inactive: USNR (DEP) 840712 - 850709 COG Period of Service Under Review :Date of Enlistment: 850710 Date of Discharge: 881116 Length of Service (years, months, days):Active: 03 04...

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-01070

    Original file (ND99-01070.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MM3___(applicant) has no potential for further service in the United States Navy.960327: BUPERS directed the applicant's discharge with characterization as type warranted by service record by reason of homosexual conduct. PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The applicant was discharged on 960502 with a general (under honorable conditions) by reason of homosexuality – homosexual admission (A). You may obtain a copy of DoD Directive 1332.28 by writing...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-00464

    Original file (ND01-00464.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Given her self-report of a life-long pattern of engaging in homosexual acts and lack of motivation to alter that behavior, it would appear to be in the best interest of both the member and the Navy to separate her via MILPERSMAN 1910.148.981214: Applicant notified of intended recommendation for by reason of homosexuality as evidenced by applicant's statement that she admitted to being a homosexual. 990107: CNMPC directed the applicant's honorable discharge by reason of homosexual conduct...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0600951

    Original file (ND0600951.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. Equity – Post service Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Applicant’s DD Form 214 (Member 4)One page from the Applicant’s Service RecordApplicant’s Statement, (no signature and no date) (2 pgs) PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00852

    Original file (ND00-00852.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    960703: Voluntary Statement from RM1 (AW) A____ M. L____ to CE1 A____ L. D_____ (Command Investigator).960826: Commanding officer recommend applicant discharge general under honorable conditions by reason of homosexuality and misconduct due to commission of a serious offense. 960916: BUPERS directed the applicant's discharge with uncharacterized (entry level separation) by reason of homosexual conduct acts. PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The...