Search Decisions

Decision Text

USMC | DRB | 2000_Marine | MD00-01067
Original file (MD00-01067.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

ex-PFC, USMC
Docket No. MD00-01067

Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review, received 000915, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. The applicant requested a personal appearance hearing before the Board in the Washington National Capital Region discharge review. The applicant listed American Legion as his representative on the DD Form 293. In the acknowledgement letter to the applicant, he was informed that the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) first conducts a documentary review prior to any personal appearance hearing.

Decision

A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 010502. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, NDRB discerned no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the applicant’s service. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the character of the discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain: UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/VOL DIS (IN LIEU OF TRIAL BY COURT MARTIAL), authority: MARCORSEPMAN Par. 6419.

PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION

Issues (verbatim)

 1. (Equity Issue) This former member opines that family problems involving custody of his children sufficiently mitigate his misconduct of record to warrant the Board's relief.

2. (Equity Issue) This former member further requests that the Board include provision of SECNAVINST 5420.174C., enclosure (1), Chapter 9, as it pertains to post-service conduct, in assessing the merits of his application.

Documentation
In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:
Copy of DD Form 214
Copies of DD Form 215
Letter from Applicant
Copy of Civil Action Order from Superior Court of New Jersey (3pgs)

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Active: USMC              None
         Inactive: USMCR(J)                930205 - 930418  COG

 Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 930419               Date of Discharge: 940914

 Length of Service (years, months, days):

         Active: 01 04 25
         Inactive: None

 Age at Entry: 20                          Years Contracted: 4

Education Level: 12                        AFQT: 37

 Highest Rank: PVT

 Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):

 Proficiency: NMA                  Conduct: NMA

 Military Decorations: None

 Unit/Campaign/Service Awards: NDSM, Rifle Marksmanship Badge

Days of Unauthorized Absence: 96

Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):

UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/VOL DIS (IN LIEU OF TRIAL BY COURT MARTIAL), authority: MARCORSEPMAN Par. 6419.

 Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

940412:  To UA.

940718:  From UA.

NO DISCHARGE PACKAGE AVAILABLE

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT
REGULATION/LAW

Discussion

The applicant was discharged on 940913 under other than honorable conditions in lieu of trial by court-martial (A and B). The Board presumed regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs (C). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (D and E).

The applicant’s representative submitted the following as issue 1: (Equity Issue) This former member opines that family problems involving custody of his children sufficiently mitigate his misconduct of record to warrant the Board's relief. T he Board sympathizes with the applicant’s personal problems, however, the Board does not understand why the applicant needed 96 days to resolve his problems. The Board recognizes that serving in the Marine Corps is very challenging to both the Marine and his family members. Our country is fortunate to have men and women willing to endure the hardships and make the sacrifices required to serve their country. It must be noted that most Marines serve honorably and well, and therefore, earn their honorable discharges. The applicant's service is accurately characterized as having been performed under other than honorable conditions. Relief is not warranted.
The applicant’s representative submitted the following as issue 2: (Equity Issue) This former member further requests that the Board include provisions of SECNAVINST 5420.174C., enclosure (1), Chapter 9, as it pertains to post-service conduct, in assessing the merits of his application. The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. However, there is no law or regulation which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time, or good conduct in the civilian life subsequent to leaving the service. Normally, to permit relief, an error or injustice must have been found to have existed during the period of enlistment in question. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent that such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered. The applicant did not provide any documentation of his post-service. The applicant's efforts need to be more encompassing than those provided. The applicant should have produced evidence of continuing educational pursuits, a verifiable employment record, documentation of community service and certification of non-involvement with civil in order for consideration for clemency based on post-service conduct. Therefore no relief will be granted. He is encouraged to continue with his pursuits and is reminded that he is eligible for a personal appearance hearing provided the application is received within 15 years from the date of discharge. Relief denied.


Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)

 A. Paragraph 6419, SEPARATION IN LIEU OF TRIAL BY COURT-MARTIAL, of the Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, (MCO P1900.16D), effective
27 Jun 89 until 17 Aug 95.

 B. The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if adjudged as part of the sentence upon conviction by a special or general court-martial for violation of the UCMJ, Article 86, unauthorized absence for more than 30 days.
C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 2, AUTHORITY/POLICY FOR DEPARTMENTAL DISCHARGE REVIEW.

D. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.2, PROPRIETY OF THE DISCHARGE.

E. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.3, EQUITY OF THE DISCHARGE.

PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ afls14.jag.af.mil ”.

The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                  Naval Council of Personnel Boards
                  Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                  720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                  Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023      


Similar Decisions

  • USMC | DRB | 2000_Marine | MD00-00189

    Original file (MD00-00189.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEWDECISIONAL DOCUMENT ex-LCpl, USMC Docket No. MD00-00189 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 991118, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION

  • USMC | DRB | 2001_Marine | MD01-00731

    Original file (MD01-00731.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD01-00731 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 010501, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. The applicant did not provide sufficient documentation to warrant an upgrade to his discharge. He is reminded that he remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received, at the NDRB, within 15 years from the date of his discharge.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004 Marine | MD04-00302

    Original file (MD04-00302.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD04-00302 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20031205. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. At this time, the Applicant has not provided sufficient documentation for the Board to consider an upgrade.

  • USMC | DRB | 2002_Marine | MD02-00823

    Original file (MD02-00823.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD02-00823 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 020517, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable or entry level separation or uncharacterized. The Applicant requested a documentary record discharge review and a personal appearance hearing in the Washington National Capital Region. Thanks, (Signed by the Applicant) Documentation Only the Applicant's service record was reviewed, as the Applicant did not provide...

  • USMC | DRB | 2000_Marine | MD00-00939

    Original file (MD00-00939.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD00-00939 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 000724, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. The applicant requested a documentary record discharge review. At this time the applicant has not provided sufficient documentation of good character and conduct.

  • USMC | DRB | 2001_Marine | MD01-00606

    Original file (MD01-00606.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD01-00606 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 010402, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (D and E).he applicant implies that a permissive doctrine exists whereby one in the military is allowed a...

  • USMC | DRB | 2000_Marine | MD00-00413

    Original file (MD00-00413.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD00-00413 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 000211, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (D and E).The applicant’s representative submitted the following as issue 1: (EQUITY ISSUE) This former member further requests that the Board include...

  • USMC | DRB | 2000_Marine | MD00-01064

    Original file (MD00-01064.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION It is for the reason listed above that we feel the character of separation given should be upgraded to honorable based on his mental conditions. mental health diagnosis is not an issue upon which the NDRB can grant relief.

  • USMC | DRB | 1999_Marine | MD99-00820

    Original file (MD99-00820.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    I am asking the Board to up-grade my discharge. I am asking the Board to up-grade my discharge. Additionally, the Board determined that the applicant was counseled about his drug usage and refused drug treatment.

  • USMC | DRB | 2002_Marine | MD02-00599

    Original file (MD02-00599.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION I wasn't going to go through with another enlistment. Documentation In addition to the service record (there was NO DISCHARGE PACKAGE AVAILABLE), the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Permanent Change of Station Orders Incomplete DD Form 214 (Handwritten Information)Report of Separation and Record of Service Copy of DD Form 214 PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service,...