Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-01099
Original file (ND99-01099.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

ex-HTFN, USN
Docket No. ND99-01099

Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review, received 990813, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to Honorable. The applicant requested a documentary record discharge review. The applicant did not list any representative on the DD Form 293.

Decision

A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 000427. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, NDRB discerned no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the applicant’s service. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the character of the discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain: GENERAL (UNDER HONORABLE CONDITIONS)/MISCONDUCT, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 3630620.

PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION

Issues

Prior to the documentary discharge review, the applicant introduced no issues as block 8 on the DD Form 293 is blank.

Documentation
In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:
Copy of DD Form 214
Statement from applicant dated July 27, 1999
Letter of recommendation dated January 23, 1997
Letter of recommendation dated January 14, 1997
Job/character reference dated January 24, 1997

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Active: USNG              900731 - 901102  HON
         Inactive:                          None

 Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 921027               Date of Discharge: 930813

 Length of Service (years, months, days):

         Active: 00 09 18
         Inactive: None

 Age at Entry: 20                          Years Contracted: 4

 Education Level: 12                        AFQT: 96

 Highest Rate: HTFN

 Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):

 Performance: NOB                  Behavior: NOB0 (0)                OTA: 3.80

 Military Decorations: None

 Unit/Campaign/Service Awards: NDSM, ASR

 Days of Unauthorized Absence: None

 Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):

GENERAL (UNDER HONORABLE CONDITIONS)/MISCONDUCT, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 3630620.

 Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

921105:  Applicant briefed on Navy's policy on drug and alcohol abuse.

930723:  Medical evaluation: ETOH/Drug Dependency Evaluation report. Steroid use. Frequency: "4". Denies problem. Assessment: Psychologically dependent. Amenable to treatment. Recommendation: None. Patient is to be separated thru legal channels.

930727:  Commanding officer directed discharge General (under Honorable conditions) by reason of misconduct due to Drug abuse (Use).

930729:  Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under Other Than Honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to Drug abuse as evidenced by wrongful use of steroids.

Partial discharge from file folder from BCNR. Xeroxed four pages from BCNR file.

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW

Discussion

The applicant was discharged on 930813 General (under Honorable conditions) for misconduct due to Drug abuse (Use) (A). The Board presumed regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs (B). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).

The applicant introduced no decisional issues for consideration by the Board. Relief denied.

The following is provided for the applicant’s benefit. There is no law or regulation that provides for the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge based solely on the passage of time or good conduct, subsequent to leaving military service. The NDRB reviews the propriety (did the Navy follow its own rules in processing the applicant for discharge) and equity (did the applicant receive a discharge characterization in keeping with Navy guidance or was the characterization typical of other service members being separated for the same reason) of each applicant’s discharge to determine if proper procedures were followed. This applicant’s discharge was proper and equitable. Additionally, the NDRB is authorized to award clemency for post-service factors (what has the applicant done since discharge to become a contributing member of his/her community and to society in general). Those factors include but are not limited to the following: Evidence of continuing educational pursuits (transcripts, diploma, degree or vocational-technical certificates), a verifiable employment history (letter of recommendation from employer), documentation of community service (letter from activity/community group), certificate of non-involvement with civil authorities (police records check) and proof of not using drugs (detoxification certificate). The applicant did not provide enough documentation of good character or conduct, which would warrant an upgrade to his discharge. The applicant is encouraged to continue to establish a reputation of good character and document his accomplishments. Documentation to support any claim of good character is a must to receive any consideration based on post-service achievements. He remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, to discuss his post-service accomplishments, provided an application is received by the NDRB within fifteen years from the date of his discharge. Legal representation at the hearing is advisable.

 Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)

 A . Navy Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 5/93, effective
05 Mar 93 until 21 Jul 94, Article 3630620, SEPARATION OF ENLISTED MEMBERS BY REASON OF MISCONDUCT DUE TO DRUG ABUSE .
B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 2, AUTHORITY/POLICY FOR DEPARTMENTAL DISCHARGE REVIEW.

C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.2, PROPRIETY OF THE DISCHARGE.

D. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.3, EQUITY OF THE DISCHARGE.

PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may obtain a copy of DoD Directive 1332.28 by writing to:
                  DA Military Review Boards Agency
                  Management Information and Support Directorate
                  Armed Forces Reading Room
                  Washington, D.C. 20310-1809

The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                  Naval Council of Personnel Boards
                  Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                  Washington Navy Yard
                  720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                  Washington, D.C. 20374-5023     


Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-00248

    Original file (ND03-00248.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    I would like a copy of the changed discharge for my personal records.” Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:None PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Inactive: USNR (DEP) 900727 - 910708 COG Active: None Period of Service Under Review :Date of Enlistment: 910709 Date of Discharge: 940527 Length of Service (years, months, days):Active: 02 10...

  • USMC | DRB | 2000_Marine | MD00-00033

    Original file (MD00-00033.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Issues Prior to the documentary discharge review, the applicant introduced no issues as block 8 on the DD Form 293 is blank. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent that such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, may be considered by the NDRB. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-00874

    Original file (ND03-00874.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. In the absence of a discharge package, the Board presumed regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs (B) and, after a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).The Applicant introduced no decisional issues for consideration by the...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-00852

    Original file (ND01-00852.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:Copy of Evaluation Report & Counseling Record (6pgs) Copy of DD Form 214 PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Active: USN None Inactive: USNR (DEP) 970109 - 970427 COG Period of Service Under Review :Date of Enlistment: 970428 Date of Discharge: 000927 Length of Service (years, months, days):Active: 03 05...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-00270

    Original file (ND04-00270.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND04-00270 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20031204. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable and the reason for the discharge be changed to “completion of required active service.” The Applicant requests a documentary record discharge review. Specification 5: Wrongfully possess illegal substances on 020825, to wit: approximately 5 grams of anabolic steroid material, liquid...

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-00680

    Original file (ND99-00680.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Age at Entry: 18 Years Contracted: 4 (24 month extension) Education Level: 12 AFQT: 89 Highest Rate: SA Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks): Performance: NOB Behavior: 1.00 (1) OTA: 1.00 Military Decorations: None Unit/Campaign/Service Awards: None Days of Unauthorized Absence: 8 Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/MISCONDUCT, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 3630620. PART III –...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-01138

    Original file (ND01-01138.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The applicant was discharged on 971126 under other than honorable conditions for misconduct due to drug abuse (use) (A). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).The applicant introduced no decisional issues for consideration by the Board. PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT If...

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-00026

    Original file (ND99-00026.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    No indication of appeal in the record.971107: Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse as evidenced by applicant’s positive urinalysis for use of lysergic acid diethylamide on or about 21 August 1997.971107: Applicant advised of his rights and having elected not to with counsel certified under UCMJ Article 27B, elected to waive all rights.971114: Commanding officer directed discharge general...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-00001

    Original file (ND02-00001.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requested a documentary record discharge review. Applicant elects Administrative Board.950510: An Administrative Board found by a unanimous vote that the applicant committed misconduct due to drug abuse and the characterization should be Other Than Honorable. Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse as evidenced by Naval Drug Laboratory, Norfolk, VA message 281036Z February 1995.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-00808

    Original file (ND02-00808.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A direct violation of Article 86 of the UCMJ), notified of corrective actions and assistance available, advised of consequences of further deficiencies, and issued discharge warning. No indication of appeal in the record.930723: Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse as evidenced by CO's NJP held on 930722.930723: Applicant advised of his rights and having elected not to consult with counsel...