Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-00886
Original file (ND99-00886.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

ex-SR, USN
Docket No. ND99-00886

Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review, received 990616, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. The applicant requested a documentary record discharge review. The applicant did not list any representative on the DD Form 293.

Decision

A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 000417. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, NDRB discerned no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the applicant’s service. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the character of the discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain: BAD CONDUCT/Convicted by special court martial, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 3640420.

PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION

Issues (verbatim)

 1. I feel the characterization of discharge should be upgraded due to psychiatric problems & alcohol abuse.

 Documentation
In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:
Copy of DD Form 214

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Active: USN                        None
         Inactive: USNR (DEP)     880513 - 880704  COG

 Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 880705               Date of Discharge: 900417

 Length of Service (years, months, days):

         Active: 01 06 29
         Inactive: None

 Age at Entry: 29                          Years Contracted: 4

Education Level: 12                        AFQT: 50

 Highest Rate: SA

 Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):

 Performance: 2.00 (2)    Behavior: 1.90 (2)                OTA: 2.80

 Military Decorations: None

 Unit/Campaign/Service Awards: None

Days of Unauthorized Absence: None

Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):

BAD CONDUCT/Convicted by special court martial, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 3640420.

 Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

890510:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 91: (3 Specs), Disrespectful in language and deportment to a Chief Petty Officer and a First Class Petty Officer and failing to accompany his LPO to a counseling session with his LCPO as he was ordered to do, violation of UCMJ Article 92: Derelict in the performance of duties that he willfully failed to clean the serving line and watch the trash during breakfast.
         Award: Forfeiture of $349.00 pay per month for 2 months ($349.00 pay per month for 1 month suspended for 6 months), restriction and extra duty for 30 days, reduction to E-1. No indication of appeal in the record.

890515:  Retention Warning: Advised of deficiency (Misconduct as evidenced by CO's NJP for violation of Articles 91 and 92), notified of corrective actions and assistance available, advised of consequences of further deficiencies, and issued discharge warning.

890618:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 91: (6 Specs), Willfully disobey an order given to him by a petty officer.
         Award: Forfeiture of $349.00 per month for 1 month, restriction and extra duty for 45 days. No indication of appeal in the record.

890625:  Pretrial Restraint 890625-890809 (46days).

890810:  Special Court Martial [trial date 890810]
         Charge I: violation of the UCMJ, Article 112a: Wrongful use of marijuana. Charge II: violation of the UCMJ, Article 90: Disobeying a lawful order from a superior commissioned officer. Charge III: violation of the UCMJ, Article 89: Disrespect toward a superior commissioned officer. Charge IV: violation of the UCMJ, Article 91: Disobeying a lawful order from MA1 C______.
         Findings: to Charge I II III, and IV and specifications thereunder, guilty.
         Sentence: CHL for 3 months, forfeiture of $400 per month for 3 months, Bad Conduct discharge.
         CA 890929: Sentence approved and, except for that part of the sentence extending to a bad conduct discharge, will be executed, but the execution of that part of the sentence extending to confinement in excess of seventy-five (75) days is suspended for twelve (12) months from the date of trial, at which time, unless the suspension is sooner vacated, the suspended part of the sentence will be remitted without further action.

890810:  Joined Naval Brig, Pearl Harbor, Hawaii, for confinement.

890908:  From confinement; to appellate leave.

890914:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 92: Failure to obey a written regulation, violation of UCMJ Article 89: Disrespect toward a commissioned officer.
         Award: Restriction and extra duty for 7 days. No indication of appeal in the record.
891221:  NMCCMR: The findings of guilty and sentence, as approved on review, are affirmed.
900227:  NC&PB clemency not granted; restoration denied.

900327:  COMA: No petition received.

 900416:  SJA: Findings and sentence are finally approved. Recommended that the discharge be executed

900417:  SSPCMO: Article 71c, UCMJ, having been complied with, Bad Conduct discharge ordered executed.            

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW

Discussion

The applicant was discharged on 900417 with bad conduct due to convicted by special court martial (A). The Board presumed regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs (B). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).

Relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a court-martial case, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. (B, Part IV) The applicant's case was considered under the pertinent standards of equity to determine if any factors in this particular case merited clemency. The NDRB found the applicant’s service record devoid of any mitigating or extenuating factors sufficient to offset the seriousness of the offenses for which the discharge was awarded. The applicant is reminded that he remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing provided that an application is received within 15 years from the date of discharge .

Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)

 A . The Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560A), Change 9, effective 14 Dec 89 until 14 Aug 91, Article 3640420, DISCHARGE OF ENLISTED PERSONNEL ADJUDGED BY SENTENCE OF COURTMARTIAL

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 19984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984) enclosure (1), Chapter 2, paragraph 2.24, COURT-MARTIAL SPECIFICATION, PRESUMPTION CONCERNING.

C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.2, PROPRIETY OF THE DISCHARGE.

D. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.3, EQUITY OF THE DISCHARGE.

PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may obtain a copy of DoD Directive 1332.28 by writing to:
                  DA Military Review Boards Agency
                  Management Information and Support Directorate
                  Armed Forces Reading Room
                  Washington, D.C. 20310-1809

The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                  Naval Council of Personnel Boards
                  Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                  Washington Navy Yard
                  720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                  Washington, D.C. 20374-5023     


Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-01246

    Original file (ND99-01246.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requested a documentary record discharge review. PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION Returned to military control 0353, 20Apr89.890529: Special Court Martial Charge I: of the UCMJ, Article 86, (2 specifications).

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-01197

    Original file (ND03-01197.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ In accordance with 32 C.F.R., section 724.166, and SECNAVINST 5420.174C, enclosure (1), paragraph 1.16, The American Legion submits to the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB or Board) the above issue and following statement in supplement to this Applicant’s petition.Review of the service record reflects that this former member was awarded NJP for on 860821 for VUCMJ, Art. Sentence: CHL for 90 days, forfeiture of $400 per...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00366

    Original file (ND00-00366.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Sentence: Bad Conduct discharge. The applicant was discharged with a BAD CONDUCT discharge from a special court martial. The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:Naval Council of Personnel Boards Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board 720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309 Washington Navy Yard D.C. 20374-5023

  • NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-00579

    Original file (ND01-00579.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, NDRB discerned no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the applicant’s service. (Equity Issue) Pursuant to 10 USC 874 (b) (UCMJ, Article 74) and in accordance with SECNAVINST 5420.174C, enclosure (1), paragraphs 2.24 and 9.3, this former member requests the Board's clemency relief with up-grade of his characterization of service to under honorable conditions on the basis...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00545

    Original file (ND00-00545.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, NDRB discerned no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the applicant’s service. PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).In the applicant’s issue 1, r

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-00749

    Original file (ND03-00749.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION Charge III: violation of the UCMJ, Article 112a: Wrongful use of cocaine on or about 880806 to 880816. Sentence: Confinement for 90 days, and a Bad Conduct discharge.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-00484

    Original file (ND02-00484.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) also advised that the board first conducts a documentary review prior to any personal appearance hearing. CA action 911030: Sentence approved and ordered executed.911116: Released from confinement and returned to full duty. Applicant declared a deserter on 920207 having been an unauthorized absentee since 0545, 920107 from USS THEODORE ROOSEVELT (CVN-71).920424: Report of Return of Deserter.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-00012

    Original file (ND02-00012.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:Copy of DD Form 214 Copy of DD Form 215Letter from ApplicantDiagnosis from Mother's Doctor Letter from Mother's DoctorCopy of Mothers Consultation RecordMedical Statement from Applicant's Mother (4pgs)Character Reference Letters (2) PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Active: USN None Inactive: USNR...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00433

    Original file (ND00-00433.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    900626: An Administrative Discharge Board, based upon a preponderance of the evidence and by unanimous vote, found that the applicant had committed misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct, that the misconduct warranted separation, and recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).The Board...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-00121

    Original file (ND01-00121.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    (Equity Issue) Pursuant to 10 USC 874 (b) (UCMJ, Article 74) and in accordance with SECNAVINST 5420.174C, enclosure (1), paragraphs 2.24 and 9.3, this former member requests the Board’s clemency relief with up-grade of his characterization of service to under honorable conditions on the basis of his post-service conduct. MBR is being processed for separation in accordance with reference OPNAVINST 5350.4A.871029: NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 86: Unauthorized absence from 0700, 19Oct87...