Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-00670
Original file (ND99-00670.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

ex-AR, USN
Docket No. ND99-00670

Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review, received 990419, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. The applicant requested a documentary record discharge review. The applicant did not designate a representative on the DD Form 293.

Decision

A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 000207. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, NDRB discerned no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the applicant’s service. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the character of the discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain: UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/IN LIEU OF TRIAL BY COURT MARTIAL, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 3630650.


The NDRB did note an administrative error on the original DD Form 214. Block 4.a, Grade, Rate or Rank, should read: "AR" vice "AA" and Block 4.b, Pay Grade, should read: "E-1" vice E-2". The original DD Form 214 should be corrected or reissued as appropriate.




PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION

Issues

 Prior to the documentary discharge review, the applicant introduced no issues as block 8 on the DD Form 293 is blank.

 Documentation
In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:
Copy of Admin Discharge package (5 pages)
Copy of DD Form 214 (2 copies)
Copy of Applicant's Change Duty Orders dated 25Sep 96

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Active: None
         Inactive: USNR (DEP)     951212 - 960805  COG

 Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 960806               Date of Discharge: 971009

 Length of Service (years, months, days):

         Active: 01 02 04
         Inactive: None

 Age at Entry: 19                          Years Contracted: 4

Education Level: 12                        AFQT: 33

 Highest Rate: AA

 Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):
Performance: NMF                  Behavior: NMF             OTA: NMF

 Military Decorations: None

 Unit/Campaign/Service Awards: None

 Days of Unauthorized Absence: 265

 Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):

UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/IN LIEU OF TRIAL BY COURT MARTIAL, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 3630650.

 Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

961201:  Unauthorized absence from NATTC Memphis.

 961205:  DAAR: Self referral/disclosure for cocaine abuse on 5 Nov 96 , screened by CAAC, not dependent, recommend disciplinary action, process for separation.
970127:  Declared deserter.

970823:  Apprehended by civilian authorities, Huntsville Police Dept.

 970826:  Return to NACIC Great Lakes, IL. (265 days) and subsequent transfer to NATTC Pensacola, FL and placed in pre-trial confinement.

970826:  NAVHOSP Pensacola, FL: Applicant cleared for confinement.

970911:  Charges preferred to summary court-martial for violation of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) Article 86: Unauthorized absence (UA) from 1 Dec 96 until apprehension on or about 26 Aug 1997.

970916:  A pplicant requested an administrative discharge under other than honorable conditions in lieu of a trial by court-martial. He consulted with counsel and was fully advised of the implications of his request. The applicant stated he understood the elements of the offense(s) with which he was charged, and admitted he was guilty of all the charges preferred against him. Specifically, he admitted to violating UCMJ, Article: 86, unauthorized absence. The applicant understood that if discharged under other than honorable conditions, it might deprive him of virtually all veterans' benefits based upon his current enlistment, and that he might expect to encounter substantial prejudice in civilian life in situations wherein the type of service rendered or the character of discharge received therefrom may have a bearing.

970924:  CO, NATTC, Pensacola, exercising GCMCA, approved the request for an administrative separation in lieu of a trial by court-martial, and directed applicant’s discharge under Other Than Honorable Conditions.

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW

Discussion

The applicant was discharged on 971009 under other than honorable conditions in lieu of a trial by court-martial (A and B). The Board presumed regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs (C). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (D and E).

The applicant introduced no decisional issues for consideration by the Board.

 Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)

 A. Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 14, effective
03 Oct 96 until 11 Dec 97, Article 3630650, PROCEDURES FOR PROCESSING ENLISTED PERSONNEL FOR SEPARATION IN LIEU OF TRIAL BY COURTMARTIAL.

B. A punitive bad conduct discharge may be adjudged for violation of the Uniform Code of Military Justice, Article 86, unauthorized absence for a period more than 30 days,upon conviction by a Special or General Court-Martial, in accordance with the Manual for Courts-Martial.

C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 2, AUTHORITY/POLICY FOR DEPARTMENTAL DISCHARGE REVIEW.

D. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.2, PROPRIETY OF THE DISCHARGE.

E. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.3, EQUITY OF THE DISCHARGE.

PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may obtain a copy of DoD Directive 1332.28 by writing to:
                  DA Military Review Boards Agency
                  Management Information and Support Directorate
                  Armed Forces Reading Room
                  Washington, D.C. 20310-1809

The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                  Naval Council of Personnel Boards
                  Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                  Washington Navy Yard
                  720 Kennon St SE Rm 309
                  Washington, D.C. 20374-5023     


Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00289

    Original file (ND00-00289.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEWDECISIONAL DOCUMENT ex-FA, USN Docket No. ND00-00289 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 991227, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. Unauthorized absence since 0600, 15Sep97.980114: Charges preferred to court-martial for violation of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) Article 86: Unauthorized absence (UA) from 0700, 15Sep97...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-00008

    Original file (ND01-00008.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The applicant was discharged on 970109 under other than honorable conditions in lieu of a trial by court-martial (A and B). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (D and E).The applicant’s issue states: “I would like a chance to receive school benefits and a change in service record.” There...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00935

    Original file (ND00-00935.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND00-00935 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 000724, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable or general/under honorable conditions or entry level separation or uncharacterized. Age at Entry: 19 Years Contracted: 4 Education Level: 12 AFQT: Unknown Highest Rate: SR Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks): Performance: NMF Behavior: NMF OTA: NMF Military Decorations: None...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-01040

    Original file (ND02-01040.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND02-01040 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 020722, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. The Applicant requested a documentary record discharge review. Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Letter from Pastor K_ F_ Copies of DD Form 214 (2) PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service...

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-00686

    Original file (ND99-00686.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND99-00686 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 990427, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to Honorable. The applicant requested a documentary record discharge review. Specification 3: In that HN D_ L. E_ did, at the Naval Hospital Pensacola, Florida, on or about April 1995, commit an indecent assault upon K_ R. G_ a person not his wife, by sliding his hands up and down her leg, with the intent to gratify his lust or...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00179

    Original file (ND00-00179.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    These documents were not attached to his application and the NDRB did correspond with applicant and requested he provide these documents. Applicant's request for discharge in lieu of trial by court-martial not contained in service record. PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The applicant was discharged on 850301 under other than honorable conditions in lieu of a trial by court-martial (A and B).

  • NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-00552

    Original file (ND01-00552.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND01-00552 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 010321, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. In the applicant’s issue 1, the Board found that the applicant suggests he should receive an honorable discharge because his unauthorized absence was less than 90 days. The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-00984

    Original file (ND02-00984.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND02-00984 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 020701, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. The Applicant requested a documentary record discharge review. requested an administrative discharge under other than honorable conditions in lieu of a trial by court-martial after admitting he was guilty of unauthorized absence for 318 days.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-00236

    Original file (ND01-00236.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In the acknowledgement letter to the applicant, the applicant was informed that the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) first conducts a documentary review prior to any personal appearance hearing. PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The applicant was discharged on 970626 under other than honorable conditions in lieu of a trial by court-martial (A and B). PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear,...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-00609

    Original file (ND03-00609.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. In the absence of a discharge package, the Board presumed regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs (C) and, after a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, found that the discharge was proper and equitable (D and E).Issue 1: The Applicant's discharge characterization accurately reflects his service to his...