Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-00100
Original file (ND99-00100.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

ex-AOAN, USN
Docket No. ND99-00100

Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review, received 981022, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. The applicant requested a documentary record discharge review. The applicant did not list any representative on the DD Form 293.

Decision

A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 000417. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, NDRB discerned no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the applicant’s service. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the character of the discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain: UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/MISCONDUCT, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 3630620.

PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION

Issues (verbatim)

 1. I enclosed these items to show my performance and willingness to succeed for duration of service and life in general. While onboard I received outstanding evals and was respected by my peers. Although requested, I was not given second urinalysis to prove my innocence. Besides what happened I feel since four years of honorable service was given it deserves something.

Documentation
In addition to the incomplete service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:
Request Chit for Accelerated Advancement to PO3
Copy of Honor Certificate
Copy of Letter of Commendation
Copy of DD Form 214

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Active: USN                        None
         Inactive: USNR (DEP)     910923 - 920831  COG

 Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 920901               Date of Discharge: 970808

 Length of Service (years, months, days):

         Active: 04 11 08
         Inactive: None

 Age at Entry: 18                          Years Contracted: 4 (12 months extension)

 Education Level: 12                        AFQT: 49

 Highest Rate: AO3

 Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):

 Performance: NMA                  Behavior: NMA             OTA: NMA

 Military Decorations: None

 Unit/Campaign/Service Awards: NDSM, AFEM, SSDR, GCA

Days of Unauthorized Absence: None

Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):

UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/MISCONDUCT, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 3630620.

 Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

Discharge package missing from service record

 970710:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 112: Use a controlled substance(marijuana).
         Award: Forfeiture of $598.00 per month for 2 months, restriction and extra duty for 45 days, reduction to E-3. No indication of appeal in the record.
970722:  Commanding officer recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse (use). Commanding officer’s comments: AOAN E_____ tested positive for use of a controlled substance as a result of a random urinalysis test. At Commanding Officer's nonjudicial punishment hearing conducted on 970710, AOAN E______ was found guilty of a violation of the Code, Article 112a, use of a controlled substance. At his hearing AOAN E______ denied wrongful use of a controlled substance. The finding of guilt was based upon a preponderance of the evidence submitted, which included the findings of the Navy Drug Lab, San Diego, California. AOAN E______ was aware of the Navy's policy on the use of controlled substance. Although such behavior is considered to be a significant departure from the minimum standards of conduct expected of all members of the naval service, AOAN E_______'s performance for over four years prior to this incident bears merits. While AOAN E______ has no potential for continued naval service, I strongly recommend the characterization of his discharge be General.

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW

Discussion

The applicant was discharged on 970808 under other than honorable conditions for misconduct due to drug abuse (use) (A). The Board presumed regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs (B). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).

In the applicant’s issue 1, the Board found that the applicant did not provide enough additional information to overcome the presumption of regularity. The applicant was properly discharged from the Navy based on his drug useage. Although he may have had above average evaluation marks, his misconduct due to drug useage overshadowed the positive aspects of his time in the service. No relief will be granted on the basis of this issue.

The applicant is reminded that the Board is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge (D). Those factors include, but are not limited to, the following: evidence of continuing educational pursuits (transcripts, diplomas, degrees, vocational-technical certificates), a verifiable employment record (Letter of Recommendation from boss), documentation of community service (letter from the activity/community group), certification of non-involvement with civil authorities (police records check) and proof of his not using drugs (detoxification certificate, AA meeting attendance or letter documenting participation in the program) in order for consideration for clemency based on post-service conduct. At this time, the applicant has not provided any documentation of good character and conduct. Therefore no relief will be granted. The applicant is strongly encouraged to continue with his pursuits and is reminded that he is eligible for a personal appearance hearing provided the application is received within 15-years from the date of discharge.

 Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)

 A . Navy Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 14, effective
03 Oct 96 until 11 Dec 97, Article 3630620 SEPARATION OF ENLISTED PERSONNEL BY REASON OF MISCONDUCT DRUG ABUSE
B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 2, AUTHORITY/POLICY FOR DEPARTMENTAL DISCHARGE REVIEW.

C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.2, PROPRIETY OF THE DISCHARGE.

D. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.3, EQUITY OF THE DISCHARGE.

PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may obtain a copy of DoD Directive 1332.28 by writing to:
                  DA Military Review Boards Agency
                  Management Information and Support Directorate
                  Armed Forces Reading Room
                  Washington, D.C. 20310-1809

The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                  Naval Council of Personnel Boards
                  Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                  Washington Navy Yard
                  720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                  Washington, D.C. 20374-5023     


Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-00904

    Original file (ND99-00904.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:Letter from applicant Copy of Driving Record Copy of Local Arrest Record Response Resume (2pgs) Copy of DD Form 214 Copy of Sailor of the Month Letter Copy of Enlisted Performance Evaluation Report (5) Copy of Enlisted Performance Record Copies from Service Record (5pgs) PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of...

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-00572

    Original file (ND99-00572.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :850218: NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 128: Assault.Award: Restriction and extra duty for 45 days, reduction to E-3. PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The applicant was discharged on 860629 under other than honorable conditions for misconduct due to drug abuse (use) (A). The Board disagrees with the applicant’s statement that his discharge was “too harsh.” Normally, an other than honorable...

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-01200

    Original file (ND99-01200.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND99-01200 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 990913, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:Copy of DD Form 214 Letter confirming completion of Alcohol and Drug Recovery Program dated August 30, 1999 Character reference letter from St. Andrew's...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-00364

    Original file (ND03-00364.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. Based on the previous and my Commanding Officer’s request for me not to accept the Admin Review Board’s decision I agreed to be separated. The Applicant's misconduct is clearly documented, and mandatory processing for separation is required for sailors who abuse illegal drugs.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-00660

    Original file (ND02-00660.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND02-00660 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 020411, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).Responding to the Applicant’s myriad issues, the Board found no evidence of impropriety, inequity or procedural irregularities in the...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-00243

    Original file (ND04-00243.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    I love my country and would gladly serve again if I could. I strongly recommend that he be discharged from the Navy and that the characterization of his discharge be other than honorable.900105: CNMPC directed the Applicant's discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse (use). The Applicant’s conduct, which forms the primary basis for determining the character of his service, reflects his willful failure to meet the requirements of his contract...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-00150

    Original file (ND02-00150.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The Applicant was discharged on 981204 under other than honorable conditions for misconduct due to drug abuse (use) (A). However, the NDRB is authorized to consider outstanding post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge, to the extent that such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Relief not...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-01209

    Original file (ND03-01209.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. Documentation In addition to the service record, ONLY PARTIAL DISCHARGE PACKAGE AVAILABLE, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Applicant’ s DD Form 214 PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Inactive: USNR (DEP) 000825 - 010116 COG Active: USN None Period...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00674

    Original file (ND00-00674.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEWDECISIONAL DOCUMENT ex-SR, USN Docket No. Concerning a change in reenlistment code, the NDRB has no authority to change reenlistment codes or make recommendations to permit reentry into the naval service or any other of the Armed Forces. Relief is not warranted.The applicant’s third issue states: “Denial of selected career because of honest response to pre-enlistment questions.” The NDRB found this issue non decisional.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-00509

    Original file (ND02-00509.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).The Applicant contends he was young and ignorant when he entered the Navy. The Applicant’s use of drugs, which forms the primary basis for determining the character of his service, reflects his willful use of a controlled substance and falls short of that required for an upgrade of his characterization of service. ...