Search Decisions

Decision Text

USMC | DRB | 1999_Marine | MD99-00649
Original file (MD99-00649.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

ex-Pvt, USMC
Docket No. MD99-00649

Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review, received 990413, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable and the reason for the discharge be changed to HON RECODE TO 2. The applicant requested a documentary record discharge review. The applicant did not list any representative on the DD Form 293.

Decision

A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 000403. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, NDRB discerned no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the applicant’s service. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the character of the discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain: UNCHARACTERIZED/ FRAUDULENT ENTRY INTO MILITARY SERVICE, authority: MARCORSEPMAN Par. 6204.3.

PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION

Issues

 1. To Whom It May Concern

During my last year of high school, I talked with a number of United States Armed Forces recruiters, and I gave a lot of serious thought to enlisting in one of the branches of the military. Being involved in the military sounded rewarding and challenging to me, and I felt it would be an honor to serve my country. Upon graduation in June 1995, 1 decided to go to college, but I still felt a strong interest in joining the military. After one semester of college, I was undecided about what academic field I wanted to pursue, and began once again to think seriously about military service. After talking with recruiters in all branches of the service, I decided to join the United States Marine Corps. I was excited and eager to accept the challenges that lay ahead as I left home headed for the MCRD in San Diego in August 1996.

Boot camp was tough and challenging and I enjoyed the excitement of it. I worked very hard and at the end of basic training, was recognized as one of the outstanding recruits. Upon my graduation from the MCRD, I received a promotion to E-2, Private First Class, and I felt very honored to be a United States Marine. I went home on leave very proud to be a member of the military, and I looked forward to further training at Camp Pendleton.

From the beginning at Camp Pendleton, things began to change for me and I felt that I was not moving ahead in my training. I started thinking about my family and experiencing homesickness, which, as I look back upon it now, seems normal especially since I had been here for a short leave following my basic training. The days were not challenging for me, and the experiences I was having were not what I had expected. I began to feel lonely and disillusioned and felt it may help to talk to someone. I talked to the chaplain, but after questioning me about my past that had included some counseling during high school, he referred me to medical personnel. There I was treated like a criminal who had entered the Marines dishonestly, and I never felt that had been the case. I became convinced that my joining the Marines had been a mistake, and I lost the enthusiasm that I had when I first joined. I became tired and embarrassed by my experience there, and decided that I want to leave the Corps.

When I was discharged from the Marine Corps, I returned home saddened by my experience. I feel that I was and could have contributed as a Marine in a positive way. Most of all, I felt that I had not achieved my goals, and that was a great disappointment.

Since leaving the Marines, I have been employed at several jobs and now am working at a job that is challenging and rewarding. However, I still would like to have the

opportunity to fulfill my dreams of completing a term of service in the United States Armed Forces. I feel that my uncharacterized discharge was unfair, and I request that it be upgraded to the highest degree possible so that I might have the opportunity to reenlist to serve in the military. I have grown and matured in the past two years and learned from the experience that I had in the Marines. I know that, if given the opportunity, I could be a positive contributor m the United States service. Very truly yours,

 If you disagree I would appreciate your explaining in detail why you disagree.

 Documentation
In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:
Copy of DD Form 214 (2 copies)
Letter from applicant's father dated January 2, 1999
Letter from Counselor, Holt Public Schools dated January 12, 1999
Character reference from a friend
Character reference dated January 19, 1999 (facsimile transmittal)
Two pages from applicant's service record (2 copies)

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Active: None
         Inactive: USMCR(J)                960430 - 960812  COG

 Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 960813               Date of Discharge: 970303

 Length of Service (years, months, days):

         Active: 00 06 21
         Inactive: None

 Age at Entry: 18                          Years Contracted: 4

 Education Level: 12                        AFQT: 64

 Highest Rank: PFC

 Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):

 Proficiency: 4.2 (2)                       Conduct: 4.2 (2)

 Military Decorations: None

 Unit/Campaign/Service Awards: None

Days of Unauthorized Absence: None

 Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):

UNCHARACTERIZED/FRAUDULENT ENTRY INTO MILITARY SERVICE, authority: MARCORSEPMAN Par. 6204.3.

 Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

961209:  Medical evaluation by Mental Health Department:
         AXIS I: Adjustment disorder with depressive mood with occupational problem.
        
         AXIS II: Borderline personality disorder EPTE.
970123:  Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge with a under other than honorable conditions by reason of defective enlistment and induction due to a fraudulent entry into the U.S. Marine Corps.
970123:          Applicant advised of his rights and having elected not to consult with counsel certified under UCMJ Article 27B, elected to waive all rights.

970213:  Commanding officer recommended discharge with a uncharacterized by reason of defective enlistment and induction due to a fraudulent entry into the U.S. Marine Corps. The factual basis for this recommendation was adjustment/depressive disorder.

970219:  SJA review determined the case sufficient in law and fact.

970219:  GCMCA [Commanding General, Marine Corps Base, Camp Pendleton] directed the applicant's discharge with a uncharacterized by reason defective enlistment and induction due to a fraudulent entry into the U.S. Marine Corps.

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW

Discussion

The applicant was discharged on 970303 with a uncharacterized by reason defective enlistment and induction due to a fraudulent entry (A). The Board presumed regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs (B). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).

In the applicant’s issue, the Board found that there was no reason to change either the reason for or the characterization of the applicant’s discharge. Additionally, it is not within the purview of the Board to change reenlistment codes. The Board has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy or Marine Corps. Reenlistment policy of the naval service is promulgated by the Bureau of Naval Personnel, Pers-282, 5720 Integrity Drive, Millington, TN 38055, and the Commandant of the Marine Corps, Headquarters Marine Corps (Code MMEA), 3280 Russell Road, Quantico, VA 22134. Neither a less than fully honorable discharge nor an unfavorable "RE" code is, in itself, a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver is normally done only during the processing of a formal application for enlistment through a recruiter. Relief to change the reenlistment code is denied.

A review of the information available reveals the applicant was processed for a discharge because he knowingly or unknowingly withheld medical information that may have precluded his initial enlistment. Per reference (a), paragraph 6204.3, the omission or concealment of facts which, if known at the time, would have reasonably been expected to preclude, postpone, or effect enlistment eligibility is cause for discharge by reason of defective enlistment. Relief to change the characterization of the applicant’s discharge is denied.

Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)

 A . The Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual,(MCO P1900.16E), effective 18 Aug 9 until present, paragraph 6204, DEFECTIVE ENLISTMENT AND INDUCTION.
B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 2, AUTHORITY/POLICY FOR DEPARTMENTAL DISCHARGE REVIEW.

C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.2, PROPRIETY OF THE DISCHARGE.

D. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.3, EQUITY OF THE DISCHARGE.

PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may obtain a copy of DoD Directive 1332.28 by writing to:
                  DA Military Review Boards Agency
                  Management Information and Support Directorate
                  Armed Forces Reading Room
                  Washington, D.C. 20310-1809

The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                  Naval Council of Personnel Boards
                  Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                  Washington Navy Yard
                  720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                  Washington, D.C. 20374-5023     


Similar Decisions

  • USMC | DRB | 2000_Marine | MD00-00600

    Original file (MD00-00600.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION (Ex-service member) never gave his childhood asthma a thought when he joined the Corp, he just wanted to serve his country like I did. The appropriate discharge was issued for the time served.

  • USMC | DRB | 1999_Marine | MD99-00987

    Original file (MD99-00987.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    I tried to serve & wanted to, but just couldn't or wasn't able to, aswauth [A94.10] After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).The Board found the applicant’s first issue not germane to the propriety and equity of the applicant’s discharge and relief is denied. A medical diagnosis, is not an issue upon which the NDRB can grant relief.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004 Marine | MD04-00179

    Original file (MD04-00179.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD04-00179 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20031107. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service was discovered by the NDRB. ” Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Letter of Achievement from Phi Theta Kappa, Honor...

  • USMC | DRB | 2003_Marine | MD03-01265

    Original file (MD03-01265.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD03-01265 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20030722. PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The Applicant was discharged on 20020920 with an uncharacterized (entry level separation) by reason of defective enlistment and induction due to a fraudulent entry (A). The Applicant’s service record did not contain any unusual circumstances during her less than two months in the military to warrant a change of discharge.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004 Marine | MD04-01025

    Original file (MD04-01025.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD04-01025 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20040610. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. The Applicant’s service record did not contain any unusual circumstances during his less than seven months in the military to warrant a change of discharge.

  • USMC | DRB | 2001_Marine | MD01-00369

    Original file (MD01-00369.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:Applicant's ltr to the Board dtd Feb 18, 2001 Copy of DD Form 214 (2 copies 1999 Blinn College Student Schedule PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Active: None Inactive: USMCR(J) 980624 - 990606 COG Period of Service Under Review :Date of Enlistment: 990607 Date of Discharge: 000112 Length of Service...

  • USMC | DRB | 2000_Marine | MD00-00833

    Original file (MD00-00833.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:Copy of DD Form 214Applicant's Record of Military Processing - Armed Forces of the United States (DD Form 1966) (6 pages) Applicant's Allotment designation (2 copies) PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Active: None Inactive: USMCR(J) 870317 - 870510 COG Period of Service Under Review :Date of Enlistment:...

  • USMC | DRB | 2001_Marine | MD01-00352

    Original file (MD01-00352.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    I feel that I should be able to obtain this because of the fact that I am an ideal citizen and that the Corps has no proof (none exists) of a fraudulent entry. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).The applicant states the Marine Corps has no proof to support that the applicant had a prior service history of mental breakdowns. PART IV - INFORMATION FOR...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004 Marine | MD04-00894

    Original file (MD04-00894.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service was discovered by the NDRB. The Applicant’s service record did not contain any unusual circumstances during his less than two months in the military to warrant a change of discharge.

  • USMC | DRB | 2003_Marine | MD03-00985

    Original file (MD03-00985.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD03-00985 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20030513. 961219: Commanding Officer recommended discharge with an entry level separation by reason of defective enlistment and induction due to a fraudulent entry into the U.S. Marine Corps. The Applicant’s service record did not contain any unusual circumstances during his less than two months in the military to warrant a change of discharge.