Search Decisions

Decision Text

USMC | DRB | 1999_Marine | MD99-00290
Original file (MD99-00290.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

ex-1stLT, USMCR
Docket No. MD99-00290

Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review, received 981218, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. The applicant requested a documentary record discharge review. The applicant listed the American Legion as his representative on the DD Form 293.

Decision

A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 991130. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, NDRB discerned no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the applicant’s service. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the character of the discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain: UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/RESIGNATION IN LIEU OF TRIAL BY COURT-MARTIAL, authority: MARCORSEPMAN Par. 4104.

The NDRB did note an administrative error on the original DD Form 214. Block 28, Narrative Reason for Separation should read: “RESIGNATION IN LIEU OF TRIAL BY COURT-MARTIAL” vice “RESIGNATION”. The original DD Form 214 should be corrected or reissued as appropriate.




PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION

Issues

 1. (Equity Issue) This former member opines that alcohol dependence impaired his ability to serve and sufficiently mitigated his misconduct of record to warrant separation under honorable conditions.

2. (Equity Issue) This former member further requests that the Board include provisions of SECNAVINST 5420.174c, enclosure (1), Chapter 9, as it pertains to post-service conduct, in assessing the merits of his application.

 Documentation
In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:
VA Outpatient Clinic Statement dated Nov 18, 1998 concerning Applicant
Applicant's undated letter to the Board
Character Reference from Central Baptist Church dated mar 3, 1998
Applicant's Supervisor letter of Jun 6, 1998
Applicant's Counselor from Mission Metroplex letter of Dec 10, 1997
Applicant's Spouse undated letter
Copy of DD Form 214

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Active: USMC              920607 - 920813  Commission
         Inactive: USMCR(C)                911005 - 920606  To attend OC School

 Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Commission: 920814               Date of Discharge: 960930

 Length of Service (years, months, days):

         Active: 04 01 014
         Inactive: None

 Age at Entry: 23                          Years Contracted: 8

 Education Level: 16                        AFQT: N/A

 Highest Rank: 1stLT

 Final Officer Performance Evaluation Averages : All officer performance reports were available to the Board for review.

 Military Decorations: None

 Unit/Campaign/Service Awards: RSB, PSB, NDSM, SSDR, MUC, COC

 Days of Unauthorized Absence: None

 Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):

UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/RESIGNATION IN LIEU OF TRIAL BY COURT-MARTIAL, authority: MARCORSEPMAN Par. 4104.

 Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

9509XX:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 92: On 9 Sep 95 apprehended by the military police for driving while under the influence of alcohol (BAC .09%)
 Awarded punitive letter of reprimand at Bn Cmdr NJP.
[Extracted from Applicant’s Fitness Report 950718 - 960112.]

960130:  Applicant rebutted his Fitness Report for the period 950718 - 960112 explaining the incident that resulted in NJP action.

960403:  Medical Officer diagnosis: dependence with physiological dependence.
                  Recommendation: Level III Inpatient Treatment.
960426:  Applicant request for resignation. [Extracted from CMC msg 310615Z JUL 96]

960731:  CMC accepted member's resignation and directed the discharge with effective date of 30 Aug 96 under other than honorable conditions due to resignation in lieu of court martial.

960807:  CO, 3 RD FSSG advised officer that his request for discharge was approved and directed his transfer to CG, MCB, Camp Pendleton, CA for separation processing.

960820:  CG MCB Camp Pendleton CA requested discharge be modified to
30 Sep 96 due to officer presently attending Level III treatment with an estimated completion date of 20 Sep 96.

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW

Discussion

The applicant was discharged on 960930 under other than honorable conditions by reason of resignation in lieu of trial by court-martial (A and B). The Board presumed regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs (C). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (D and E).

 The applicant’s representative submitted the following as issue 1: (Equity Issue). This former member opines that alcohol dependence impaired his ability to serve and sufficiently mitigated his misconduct of record to warrant separation under honorable conditions. The NDRB does acknowledges that alcohol dependence did impair the applicant’s ability to serve. However, this acknowledgement does not preclude the applicant from obeying regulations; especially when the orders violation occurs more than once.
The applicant’s representative submitted the following as issue 2: (Equity Issue).
 This former member further requests that the Board include provisions of SECNAVINST 5420.174c, enclosure (1), Chapter 9, as it pertains to post-service conduct, in assessing the merits of his application. The NDRB found that there is not sufficient post-service accomplishments to warrant a discharge upgrade, at this time. The applicant is encouraged to have a personal appearance hearing before the NDRB within 15 years from his date of discharge. Relief is denied.

Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)
A. Chapter 4, Paragraph 4104 of the Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, (MCO p1900.16E) effective 18 August 1995 until present, RETIREMENT OR RESIGNATION.
B. The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if adjudged as part of the sentence upon conviction by a special or general court-martial for violation of the UCMJ Article.

C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 2, AUTHORITY/POLICY FOR DEPARTMENTAL DISCHARGE REVIEW.

D. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.2, PROPRIETY OF THE DISCHARGE.

E. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.3, EQUITY OF THE DISCHARGE.

PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may obtain a copy of DoD Directive 1332.28 by writing to:
                  DA Military Review Boards Agency
                  Management Information and Support Directorate
                  Armed Forces Reading Room
                  Washington, D.C. 20310-1809

The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                  Naval Council of Personnel Boards
                  Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                  Washington Navy Yard
                  720 Kennon St SE Rm 309
                  Washington, D.C. 20374-5023     


Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004 Marine | MD04-00862

    Original file (MD04-00862.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable or general (under honorable conditions). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service was discovered by the NDRB. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint.

  • USMC | DRB | 1999_Marine | MD99-00478

    Original file (MD99-00478.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD99-00478 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 990218, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. The fact remains that Corporal (Applicant) has been determined to be an alcohol abuser. However, the service that is recorded in Corporal (Applicant)'s record book merits a general discharge.

  • USMC | DRB | 2002_Marine | MD02-00221

    Original file (MD02-00221.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:Copy of DD Form 214Navy & Marine Corps Appellate Leave Activity, Wash DC, ltr of 3 Oct 97 concerning applicant's punitive discharge from active dutySSPCMO #97-1656 DTD 23 Oct 97 PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Active: None Inactive: USMCR(J) 950713 - 951029 COG Period of Service Under Review :Date of...

  • USMC | DRB | 2001_Marine | MD01-00751

    Original file (MD01-00751.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant's representative requested that the reason for separation be change to "Secretarial Authority". Dear members of the board: The following issues are the reasons my discharge should be upgraded from a general discharge to an honorable discharge. Additionally, advised applicant is submitting a letter of resignation and requested leave awaiting separation.990730: Applicant tendered a resignation of commission in lieu of processing for administrative separation for cause,...

  • USMC | DRB | 2002_Marine | MD02-01148

    Original file (MD02-01148.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Recommend administrative separation due to unsuitability.950801: Mental Health, Naval Hospital, Camp Pendleton, CA: Diagnosis: Antisocial Personality Disorder, Alcohol Dependence, Paraphilia, NOS. 951031: Medical Board, completion of limited duty, returned to full duty.951205: Statement by SgtMaj C_ H. L_, USMC, recommending the separation of Applicant.951206: Commanding Officer, MWSS-372, MWSG-37, Camp Pendleton, CA, recommended discharge under honorable conditions (general) for the...

  • USMC | DRB | 2000_Marine | MD00-00617

    Original file (MD00-00617.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Determines condition is a "physical condition" and "not a disability". st MarDiv(Rein)] directed the applicant's discharge under Honorable conditions (General) by reason of a physical condition not a disability. PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The applicant was discharged on 971031 under Honorable conditions (General) by reason of Convenience of the government due to condition not a physical or mental disability (A).

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-00549

    Original file (ND99-00549.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In the acknowledgement letter to the applicant, he was informed that the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) first conducts a documentary review prior to any personal appearance hearing. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (D and E).In the applicant’s issue 1, the Board determined this issue is without merit. The applicant has provided some documentation of...

  • USMC | DRB | 2003_Marine | MD03-00703

    Original file (MD03-00703.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD03-00703 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20030310. "It also states on page 1-17 section 1202 item g “Return to full duty those Marines who successfully complete an appropriate treatment program.” and continues to item h “Process for administrative separation those Marines who do not successfully complete or refuse appropriate treatment programs or who are unable to achieve/maintain accepted Marine Corps standards of performance and/or conduct after...

  • USMC | DRB | 2001_Marine | MD01-00902

    Original file (MD01-00902.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:Character Reference ltr from former Marine, R_ D. B_, dtd June 22, 2001 Copy of DD Form 214 PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Active: None Inactive: USMCR(J) 950918 - 951204 COG Period of Service Under Review :Date of Enlistment: 951205 Date of Discharge: 980518 Length of Service (years, months,...

  • USMC | DRB | 2003_Marine | MD03-00023

    Original file (MD03-00023.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    920122: CORRECTIVE ADMIN ACTION: CG, 3d MARDIV directed CO, 4 PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The Applicant was discharged on 19930420 with a bad conduct discharge which was the sentence adjudged by a properly constituted special court-martial that was determined to be legal and proper, affirmed by appellate review authority and executed (A and B). The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if adjudged as part of the...