DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
701 §. COURTHOUSE RD SUITE 1004
ARLINGTON VA 22204-2490
a a
CS wrx
teehee
Satie
BAN
Docket No.NRO4749-13
30 September 2013.
This ig in reference to your application for correction of your naval
record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552.
‘A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records,
sitting in executive session, considered your application on
‘30 September 2013. Your allegations of error and injustice were
reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures
applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material
considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with
all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board considered
the advisory opinion (A/0) furnished by the Navy Personnel Command
(NPC) memo 5420 PERS-831 of 27 Aug 2013, a copy of which was provided
to you on 12 September 2013. You had 30 days to respond and you have
failed to do so. Therefore, your case was presented to the Board as
is.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record,
the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to
establish the existence of probable material error or injustice, In
making this determination, the Board substantially concurred with the
comments contained in the advisory opinion. Accordingiy, your
application has been denied. The names and votes of the Members of
the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board
reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material evidence
or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this
regard, it is also important to keep in mind that a presumption of
regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently, when
appiying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is
on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
Sincerely,
Lo Dean?
W. DEAN PFEIF
Executive Direttor
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR3699-13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 41 October 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 05133 12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 October 2013. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by OCNO Memo 7220 Ser N130D/13U0849 dated 30 September 2013, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR804 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 October 2013. The Board also considered your e-mail dated 30 September 2013 with attachment. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR0163 13
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in Support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR1662-13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 September 2013. In addition, the Board congidered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC Memo dated 30 May 2013, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05829-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 March 2010. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by the Director, NNCAP, Navy Medicine Manpower, Personnel Training and Education Command dated 11 December 2009 with enclosures, a copy of which is attached less enclosures. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 07488-12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, Sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 January 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR4846-13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 September 2013. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman and Exnicios reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 30 September 2013 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), the office “having...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR6478 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 December 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR4703-13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session; considered your application on 3 September 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...