DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY |
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490
BIG
Docket No: 4165-15
26 March 2014
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the
United States Code, section 1552.
-A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application 25 March 2014. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by. the Board consisted
of your application, together with all material submitted in
support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes,
, _ regulations and policies.:
After careful and conscientious, consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
You enlisted in the Navy and entered a period of active duty on
26 January 1987. You received nonjudicial punishment on three
. occasions for unauthorized absence (two instances), and.assault.
You also admitted to wrongfully using marijuana one to three
times per month for which no disciplinary action was taken.
Your commanding officer then recommended you for administrative
separation with an other than honorable (OTH) characterization
of service discharge due to misconduct. You waived your
procedural right to an administrative discharge board (ADB). On
3 June 1988, you received an OTH characterization of service
discharge due to misconduct, and were assigned an RE-4 (not
recommended for retention) reenlistment code.
In its review of your application, the Board carefully weighed
all potentially mitigating factors, such as your youth and
current desire to upgrade your discharge. However, the Board
concluded that your discharge should not be changed due to your
acts of misconduct and drug abuse. The Board noted that you
waived the right to an ADB, your best opportunity for retention
or a better characterization of service. Finally, you are
advised that no discharge is upgraded automatically ‘due solely
to the passage of time or post service good conduct. In view of
.the above, your application has been denied. The names and
votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon
“request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have
the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
Material evidence or other matter not previously considered by
the. Board. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that |
a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official
naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
Tea & .
: . LAD. peer,
. ROBERT D. ZSALMAN
Acting Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR4806 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 March 2014. You were then advised that your command was recommending you for administrative separation with an other than honorable (OTH) characterization of service due to misconduct. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR3827-13
of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 March 2014. the Board consisted ‘of your application, together with all material submitted. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR3713-13
A three-member ‘panel ‘of: the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 February 2014. You elected to exercise your procedural right to have your case considered by an administrative discharge. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official Naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR9464-13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 February 2014. The Board also considered the report of the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) dated 26 February - 2009, a copy of which is attached. The Board, in its review of your entire record, carefully considered all potentially mitigating factors, such as your youth, post service good conduct, current desire to remove your ~ NUP, and upgrade your...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR4163-13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 March 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all Material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the - existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5801 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 May 2014. On 16 January 1997, you received an OTH characterization of service discharge due to misconduct, and were assigned an RE- 4 (not recommended for reenlistment) reentry code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR6018 13
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Your commanding officer then recommended you for administrative separation with an other than honorable (OTH) characterization of service discharge due to misconduct. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5931 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval ‘Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application 3 June 2014. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR3216-13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board also considered the report of the Naval Discharge Review Board dated 21 Senuaxy 1999, a copy GE which is attached.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR3830-13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 March 2014, Your allegations of error and. The Board also. On 1 February 1974, you received the OTH characterization of service due to misconduct...