DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490
TAL
Decket No: 4098-13
28 March 2014
af
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10, United
States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
‘application on 26 March 2014. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted
of your application, together with all material submitted in
Support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes,
regulations, and policies.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient
to establish the existence of probable material error or
‘injustice.
You reenlisted in the Navy on 30.December 1999 after more than
_two years of prior honorable service. In your last enlisted
evaluation report for the period:of 16 March 2004 through
15 March 2005 you were marked as having significant problems and
not recommended for retention in the Navy. It was also noted
that you failed six Physical Fitness Assessments (PFA): On
24 April 2006, you were honorably discharged from active duty
-and assigned an RE-4 reenlistment code. .
The Board, in its review of your entire record and application,
carefully weighed all .potentially mitigating factors, such as
your youth, prior honorable service, and desire to change your
reenlistment code for. possible reentry into the armed forces..
‘Nevertheless, the Board concluded these factors were not
sufficient to warrant a change in your reenlistment code given
=~
the non-recommendation for reenlistment which was sufficient to
support the assignment of an RE-4. Accordingly, your
application has been denied. The names and. votes of the members
of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have
the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new. and
material evidence or other matter not previously considered by
‘the Board. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that -
_@ presumption of regularity attaches_to all official records=
“Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official
naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
‘existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
ROBERT D. ZSALMAN
Acting Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5884 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 June 2014. On 19 November 1991, you received the honorable discharge by reason of your diagnosed personality disorder and were assigned an RE-4 (not recommended for retention) reenlistment code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR4186-13
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. On 11 April 2009, you were honorably released from active duty, transferred to the Navy Reserve, and assigned an RE-4 (not recommended for reenlistment) reentry code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of.an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2540-13
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 7015S. A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 1 April 2014. Nevertheless, the Board concluded these factors were not sufficient to warrant a change in the reentry code given your NJP, and the fact that you received a reentry code authorized by regulations.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0655 14
A three-member panel of thie Board for Correction of Naval’ Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 March 2014. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was “insufficient to establish Ebe existence | of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying | for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0295 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 March 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, -regulations, and policies. «Consequently, when applying for a. correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the | .existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR6081 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval “Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 June 2014. On 10 June 1998, you were honorably released from active duty and assigned an RE-4 (not recommended for retention) reenlistment code. Consequentiy, when applying for a correction of an official _haval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0454 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR6745 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 July 2014. In this regard, you were assigned the most favorable reenlistment code based on your circumstances. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0642 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 May 2014. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR9132 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 July 2014. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error...