DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
701 S, COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490
TAL
Docket No: 4070-13
— 5 ee Sm eB es a 21 March 2014 °° ~
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the
United States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board. for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your |
application on 19 March 2014. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
‘Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted
of your application, together with all material submitted in |
support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes,
regulations, and policies. —
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient
to establish the existence Of probable material error or
injustice.
You reenlisted in the Navy on 13. November 1986 after more than
two years of prior honorable service. On 10 March 1987, you
received nonjudicial punishment (NUP) for unauthorized absence
‘from your unit for a period of two days and failure to obey a
lawful regulation. On 28 June 1988, you received NJP for making
a false official statement and wrongful use of marijuana. You
were notified of pending administrative discharge processing
with an-other than honorable (OTH) discharge due to misconduct
“(drug abuse). You waived all:of your procedural rights,
including your right to an administrative discharge board (ADB) .
On 29 July 1988, you received the OTH discharge for misconduct
(drug abuse) . :
The Board, in its review of your application, carefully weighed
all potentially mitigating factors, such as your youth, prior
honorable service, and overall record of service. Nevertheless,
the Board concluded these factors were not sufficient to warrant
recharacterization of your discharge given the seriousness of
your misconduct. Finally, the Board found that you waived the
right to an ADB, your. best opportunity for retention or a better
characterization of service. Accordingly, your application has
been denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel
-will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have
the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and ~
material evidence or other matter not previously considered by
the Board. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that
a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.»
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official
naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
TRA QS |
ROBERT D. ZSALMAN
Acting Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2689-13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your “application on 29 January 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2468-13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 February 2014. Subsequently, administrative discharge action was initiated by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse, You waived your rights to consult counsel, submit a statement or have your case heard by an administrative discharge board (ADB). Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR4096-13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval ‘Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 March 2014. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR6689 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 July 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR1427 13
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 7 May 1990, you received a second NJP for wrongful use of marijuana. Subsequently, administrative discharge action was initiated by reason of misconduct due to wrongful drug use.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR6759 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 July 2014. On 6 May 1988 you were so discharged. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR6711 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 July 2014. Subsequently, administrative discharge action was initiated by reason of misconduct due to wrongful drug use. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5412 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 June 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2415-13
— A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 February 2014. Subsequently, administrative discharge action was initiated by reason of misconduct due to wrongful drug use. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR7043 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 August 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 27 November 1991, you were notified of pending administrative discharge processing with an other than honorable (OTH) discharge due to...