. DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
701 S, COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 °
BUG
' Docket No: 3838-13
6 March 2014
% 7
7 i
This, is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the
United States Code, section 1552.
The Board. did not consider your request for a Vietnam Campaign
Medal’ as you have not exhausted your: administrative remedy of
applying: to Headquarters Marine Corps for it. Please send your
request to the following address:
Headquarters Marine Corps (Code MMMA - 3)
3280 Russell Road
Quantico, Virginia 22134
A three- member panel of the: Board for Correction of Naval.
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 5 March 2014. Your allegations of error and _
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings . -Of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted
of your application, together with all Material submitted in
support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, —
regulations. and policies.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
- insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice,
You enlisted in the Marine Corps and entered active duty on 9
July 1969. You received nonjudicial punishment on two ot¢casions |
for disobeying a lawful order and unauthorized absence. You
completed your active obligated service and were transferred to
the Marine Corps Reserve with a type warranted by service record
characterization. On 9 July’ 1971, you received a general
characterization of service, and were assigned an RE-4 (not
recommended for retention) reenlistment code. You were
honorably discharged from the Marine Corps Reserve on 8 July
1975. — . ce
In its review of your application, the Board carefully weighed
all potentially mitigating factors, such as your youth, Vietnam
service, and'current desire to upgrade your discharge. . However,
the Board concluded that your discharge should not be changed
because of your misconduct. You are advised that no discharge
is upgraded due merely to the passage of time or post service
good conduct. In view of the above, your application has been
denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be.
furnished upon request... :
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have
the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
material evidence or other matter not previously considered by
the Board. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that
a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official
naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
. Sincerely,
| iedals cere ,
ROBERT D. ZSALMAN _ .
Acting Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8932 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 September 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when “applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR3513-13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitti ng in executive session, considered your application on 18 March 2014... You enlisted i he existence of: probable material error or n the Marine Corps and began a period of active duty on 25 January 1968. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval .
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0631 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 June 2014. On 8 July 2013, you submitted a request to reenlist, however; it was denied by Headquarters Marine Corps. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR4660 13
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Nevertheless, the Board concluded these factors were not sufficient to warrant a change in your characterization of service given-your NUP, SPCM conviction, and failure to attain the required average in conduct. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR6602 13
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of Reckabis Material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5616 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 June 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted ‘in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. The Board concluded that you received the benefit of your bargain with the Marine Corps when you were discharged at your request rather than being...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2412-13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in ‘executive session, considered your application on 11 February 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Nevertheless, the Board concluded these factors were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge given your misconduct that...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05890-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations In addition, the Board considered the advisory and policies. opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps dated 2 October 2001, a copy of which is attached. evidence in your records that you were engaged in actions that would entitle you to this award.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2807-13
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 $. A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval ‘Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 February 2014. Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in Support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2931 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 38 October 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statuces, regulations, and policies. With regard :to your contention of suffering from PTSD, there is no evidence in the record to Support it, and you submitted no such evidence.