DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490
BUG -
Docket No:. 3752-13
6 March 2014
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the. provisions of title 10 of the
United States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application 5 March 2014. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by: the Board consisted
of your application, together with all material submitted in |
support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes,
regulations and policies. :
After careful and conscientious. consideration of the entire
-record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient ‘to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
“You enlisted in the Navy and entered a period of active duty on
31 July 1975. You were convicted by civil authorities of
‘attempted armed robbery and assault. |Your commanding officer
then recommended you for administrative separation with an other
than honorable characterization of service discharge due to
misconduct. You waived your procedural right to an |
administrative discharge board (ADB) in exchange for a general
characterization of service. on 6 August 1976, you received a
general characterization of service discharge due to misconduct.
In its review of your application, the Board carefully weighed
all potentially mitigating factors, such as your youth,
allegation that you were not guilty of the offenses, and current
‘desire to upgrade your discharge. However, the Board concluded
that your discharge should not be changed due to your acts of
misconduct. The Board noted that you waived the right to an
ADB, your best opportunity for retention or a better
characterization of service. Regarding your allegation, the
Board particularly noted that you. pled guilty to the offenses. |
Finally, you are advised that no discharge is upgraded
automatically due solely to the passage of time or post service.
good conduct. in view of the above, your application has been _
denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be
furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have
_the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
material evidence or other matter not previously considered by.
the Board. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that
a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. .
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official
naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely, ~
ss ROBERT D. ZSALMAN
Acting Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR6981 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application 29 July 2014. On 13 January 1988, you received an OTH characterization of service discharge due to misconduct (COSO), and were assigned an RE-4 (not. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR6669 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application 15 July 2014. On 24 November 1961, you received an OTH characterization of service discharge due to misconduct. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5309 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application 14 May 2014. On 15 June 1995, you received an OTH characterization of service discharge due to misconduct, and were assigned an RE-4 (not recommended for retention) reentry code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5838 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application 28 May 2014. Your commanding officer then recommended you for administrative separation with an other than honorable (OTH) characterization of service discharge due to misconduct. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5308 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application 14 May 2014. On 22 January 1991, you received an OTH characterization of service discharge due to misconduct, and were assigned an RE-4 (not recommended for retention) reenlistment code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR4697 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application 8 April 2014. Your commanding officer then recommended you for administrative separation with an other than honorable (OTH) characterization of service discharge due to misconduct. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR3231-13
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted — of your application, together with all material submitted in support: thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. On 5S March 1963, you received an OTH characterization of service discharge due to misconduct. — Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR3868-13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application 11 March 2014. of this Board. Consequently, when applying for.a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR4039 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 April 2014. You were so discharged on 23 May 1988. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR6354 13
On 6 May 1986, you received an OTH characterization of service discharge due to misconduct, and were assigned an RE-4B (in-service drug use) reenlistment code. However, the Board concluded that your discharge should not be changed due to your acts of misconduct. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official .NMhaval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.