. DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
701 S, COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490
BUG .
Docket No: 3744-13
6 March 2014
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the
United States Code, section 1552.
You are advised that since your discharge is less than 15 years
old, you may apply to the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB)
for a change of your characterization of service and narrative
reason for separation. I have enclosed NDRB‘s application form
for your convenience. |
A three-member panel of the Board’ for Correction of Naval
_ Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 5 March 2014. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with - administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the. proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted
of your application, tegether with all material submitted in
Support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes,
regulations and policies. :
After careful and conscientious. consideration of the entire -
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
. insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
' error or injustice.
You enlisted in the Navy and entered a period of active duty on
8° July 2010. Your record is incomplete, but you were diagnosed
with a condition, not a disability, that interfered with the
performance of your duties. | Your command notified you that you
were being processed for administrative separation due to your
diagnosed condition with a type warranted by service record
characterization of service. On 22 April 2011, you received a
general characterization of service due to a condition, not a
disability, and were assigned an RE-4 (not recommended for
retention) reentry code.
In its review of your application, the Board carefully weighed
all potentially mitigating factors, such as your youth and
current desire to change your reentry code. However, the Board
concluded that there was no error or injustice in the assignment
of your RE-4 reentry code in light of your diagnosed condition,
“failure to complete your enlistment, and non-recommendation for .
retention. In view of the above, your application has been
denied. The names ahd votes of the members of the panel will be
furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable action cannot be taken.- You are entitled to have
‘the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
_ material evidence or other matter not previously considered by
the Board. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that
“a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official
naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
RD Kn
_ ss ROBERT D. ZSALMAN
Acting Executive Director
Enclosure
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5699 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 June 2014. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5410 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 June 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof,-your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Finally, Sailors discharged by reason of a condition, not a disability would normally be assigned an RE-4 reentry code.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR9447 13
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. The Board noted that an RE-3P is the most favorable reentry code that may be assigned to individuals who are separated by reason of condition, not a disability, during initial training. Consequentiy, when applying for a correction of an official jnpaval record, he burden is on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8415 13
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. The Board noted that an RE-3P is the most favorable reentry code that may be assigned to individuals who are separated by reason of condition, not a disability, during initial training. : Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0634 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 May 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. The Board noted that an RE-3P is the most favorable reentry code that may be assigned to individuals who are separated by reason of condition not a...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5642 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 August 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. ({onsequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR9174 13
You requested that your “MBK5” {expiration of term of service) separation code and “RE-1A" (eligible for reenlistment code} reentry code issued on 22 May 2011 be changed on your Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty (DD Form 214). , R three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 October 2014. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR4848 13
You may apply to the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) for a possible change. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. However, the Board concluded that your reentry code should not be changed because of your diagnosed sleepwalking disorder.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR4022 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 June 2014. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. In this regard, you were assigned the appropriate reentry code based on your circumstances.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0668 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 April 2014. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.