DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
701 S. COURTHOUSE RD SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON VA 22204-2490
BAN
Docket No:NR83580-13
12 March 2014
From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To; Secretary of the Navy
Subj:
Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. 1552
Encl: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments
(2) Navy Personnel Command (NPC) memo 1430 Ser 811/037
of
1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed
enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the
applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was
advanced to E-5/SK2 from the ee v2. wide
advancement exam,
2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Ruskin and
George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice
on 10 March 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined
that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on
the available evidence of record. Documentary material
considered by the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval
records, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record
pertaining to Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice,
finds as follows:
a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all
administrative remedies available under existing law and
regulations within the Department of the Navy.
b. In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), the office
having cognizance over the subject matter addressed in
Petitioner’s application has commented to the effect that the
request has merit and warrants favorable action.
CONCLUSION
Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and
especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board
finds the existence of an injustice warranting the following
corrective action.
RECOMMENDATION:
That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected, where appropriate,
as follows:
a. Petitioner was advanced to E-5/SK2 from the qa
GP Navy-wide advancement exam with an effective date of 9»
GEE? with 2 Tine In Rate date of >
b. Petitioner will be issued a DD Form 215 to reflect
E-5/SK2 vice E-4/SK3, and the “frocked” status shall be removed
from her DD Form 214. ,
Note: Petitioner was discharged on es, with an
‘honorable characterization of service.
c. That a copy of this Report of Proceedings be filed in-
Petitioner’s naval record.
4, Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the
Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federai
Regulations, Section 723.6(c)) it is certified that quorum was
present at the Board's review and deliberations, and that the.
foregoing is a true and complete record of the Board’s
proceedings in the above entitled matter.
ROBERT D. ZSALMAN nds. ‘A MONTGOMER
Recorder . . Acting Recorder
Bi Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section
6{e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of
Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(e))
and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby
announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken under the
authority of reference (a), has been approved by the Board on
behalf of the Secretary of the Navy. .
12 March 2014
TR peed | a
ROBERT D. ZSALMAN
Acting Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 01386-09
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced to E-5/SK2, when first eligible in March 2008. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 22 June 2009 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8640 13
_ DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 $, COURTHOUSE RD SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON VA 22204-2490 BAN Docket No:NROQ8640-13 11 March 2014 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: iia? Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced to E-4/STS3 from the March 2011 Navy-wide...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1177 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he had one additional award point that should have been added to the March 2013 Navy-wide advancement exam. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Ruskin and Exnicios reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 21 July 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR7626 13
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced to E-5/PS2 from the March 2013 Navy-wide advancement exam. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Ruskin and George reviewed petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 10 March 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2783 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he was advanced to CTR2/E5 from the March 2013 Navy-wide advancement exam. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Ruskin and George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 4 August 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8585 13
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 §. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced to E-5/MM2 from the September 2012 Navy-wide advancement exam. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Ruskin and George reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 10 March 2014 and, pursuant to its...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4193 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that his Time in Rate to E-5/MM2 be restored to March 2011 and that he was authorized to take the March 2014 E-6/JIM1 advancement examination. The Board, cons .sting of Ms. Davis, Ms. Wilcher and Mr. Grover reviewed Petitioner|s allegations of error and injustice on 15 July 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0322 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced to E-6/ETl from the September 2012 Navy-wide advancement examination. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Ruskin and George reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 24 March 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR9380 13
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he was advanced to IT2/E5 from the September 2012 Navy-wide advancement exam. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Ruskin and George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 4 August 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8335-13
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced to E-6/BM1 from the August 2011 Navy-wide Reserve advancement exam. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Ruskin and George reviewed_Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the...