Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR3480-13
Original file (NR3480-13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490

 

BUG .
Docket No: 3480-13
.12 February 2014

 

‘This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the
United States Code, section 1552. .

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 11 February 3014. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
_regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted
of your application, together with all material submitted in
support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes,

regulations and policies.

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was.
insufficient to’establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.

The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy Reserve on 12
November 1975. On 22 January 1990, you were convicted in civil
court in Norfolk, Virginia, of frequenting a public place for
-lewdness. On 23 May 1990, you admitted to the Naval
Investigative Service that you had received oral sex from a man
in the woods at a rest area in Norfolk, Virginia, which was
witnessed by a civilian police officer. You were notified that
your commanding officer was recommending you for administrative
separation with an other than honorable (OTH) discharge due to
misconduct. You exercised your procedural right to have your
case heard by an administrative discharge board (ADB). The ADB
met, found you had committed misconduct based on your conviction
and personal admission, however, it recommended retention. You
were retained on active duty. On 5 August 1996, you were placed
on the Temporary Disability Retired List, and assigned a
waivable RE-3P (temporary disability) reentry code.

In its review of your application, the Board carefully weighed
all potentially mitigating factors, such as your many years of
‘honorable service and the repeal of the “Don’t ask, don’t tell”
homosexual policy. However, the Board concluded that the
‘derogatory material should not.be removed from your record in
kight of the aggravating circumstances of your admission to
public lewdness and civil conviction. In view of the above,
your application has been denied. The names and votes of the
members of the panel will be furnished-upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have
che Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
material evidence or other matter not previously considered by»
the Board. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that
a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official
naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.

Sincerely,

4 Ne etn te SD, (roe __
ROBERT D. ZSALMAN
Acting Executive Director

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 09335-07

    Original file (09335-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.On 10 June 1988, you enlisted in the Navy at age 24. However, no separation action was taken and you...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 11454-10

    Original file (11454-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 28 November 1982, you received NJP for unauthorized absence from your unit for a period of six days. You were notified of pending administrative discharge processing with an other than honorable (OTH) discharge due to misconduct (drug abuse).

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR4993 13

    Original file (NR4993 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 May 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 04231-09

    Original file (04231-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 February 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 00369-11

    Original file (00369-11.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 October 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 06786-07

    Original file (06786-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 11 June 1991 at age 19. Unfortunately, on 9 January 2006, the discharge...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 08836-09

    Original file (08836-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 June 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 11330-10

    Original file (11330-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all, material gubmitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. As a result of the NIS investigation, you were convicted by general court-martial (GCM) of five specifications of indecent assault against female Marines, peeping through a window of a Female Marine, looking into the bathroom of a female Marine, and unlocking a bathroom door and peeping...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 05741-07

    Original file (05741-07.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 February 2008. On 15 January 1990, you began a UA that ended on 3 February 1990, a period of about 19 days. Nevertheless, the Board concluded that these factors were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge due to the seriousness of your misconduct that continued even after you were counseled regarding deficiencies in your performance and...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 02224-08

    Original file (02224-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board noted that as a result of your prior period of honorable service, you may be eligible for veterans' benefits. -You may also request that Headquarters Marine Corps (MMSB-10) issue a discharge certificate for your honorable period of service.