DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
7OT S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490
CRS
Docket No: 2998-13
2 April 2014
i)
Jie
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the
United. States Code section 1552. .
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 8 January 2014: Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted
of your application, together with all material submitted in
support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes,
regulations and policies.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable. material
error or injustice. ,
The Board found that you reenlisted in the Navy on 17 September
1999 after more than three years of prior active service. On 9
April 2001 an administrative discharge board recommended that
you be separated with a discharge under other than honorable
conditions by reason of misconduct due to the commission of a
serious offense. This was based on larceny and frauds against
the United States and making or using a false writing or other
paper in connection with claims for’ which you received no
disciplinary action. After review by the discharge authority,
the recommendation for separation was approved and on 15 June
2001 you received a discharge under honorable conditions, and
were assigned a reentry. code of RE- 4.
+
The Board concluded that as the assignment of a reentry code of
RE-4 is required when an individual is discharged by reason of
misconduct, there is no basis for any corrective action in your
case. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names
and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon
request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have
, the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
‘material evidence-or other matter not previously considered by —
the Board. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that
a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official
naval record, the.burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
. existence of probable Material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
i
ROBERT D. ZSALMAN
Acting Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0534 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 May 2014. The Board, in its review of your entire record and application, carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors present in your case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0729 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 July 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. You must first apply to the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB).
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR4298-13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 January 2014. {Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your ‘application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, whén applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR4355 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 1 April 2014. On 9 February 2010, you completed your active duty obligation in pay grade E-1, were honorably transferred to the Navy Reserve, and assigned an RE-4 (not. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR4046 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 May 2014. However, based on your Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty (DD Form 214), you received an honorable discharge due to misconduct on 5 November 2010. In this regard, you were assigned the appropriate reentry code based on your circumstances.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR6088 13
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 7O1S. A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your | application on 6 March 2014. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR3446-13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 February 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in Support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official - naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR4860-13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive. ‘Documentary : material considered by the Board consisted of your application, tegether with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR1863-13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 January 2014. with all material submitted in - support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, _regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 01940-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 November 2009.. When informed of that recommendation, you waived the right to present your case to an administrative discharge board. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.