Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2010-13
Original file (NR2010-13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

704 & COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 150%
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490

    

   
 

 

BS S
We 3 Ba
iene
ares

  

JET
Docket No. NR2010-13
11 Oct i3

 

This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 Use 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 11 October 2013. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted
of your application, together with all material submitted in
support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes,
regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the
advisory opinion furnished by CNO Memo 7220 Ser N130D2/13U0393
dtd 7 May 13, a copy of which is attached.

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially
concurred with the comments contained in the advisory opinion.
Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and
votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon
request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have
the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
material evidence or other matter not previously considered by
the Board. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that
a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official
Docket No. NR2010-13

naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.

Sincerely,

   
  

W. DE
Executive Di

Enclosure: CNO Memo 7220 Ser N130D2/1300393 dtd 7 May 13

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR0727 13

    Original file (NR0727 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 December 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNO Memo 7220 Ser N130D2/13U0885 dtd 11 Oct 13, a copy of which is attached.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 04512-12

    Original file (04512-12.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR4764 13

    Original file (NR4764 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 December 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNO Memo 7220 Ser N130D2/13U0883 dta 11 Oct 13, a copy of which is attached.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR0796-13

    Original file (NR0796-13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 September 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNO Memo 7220 Ser N130D2/13U0383 dtd 6 May 13, a copy of which is attached.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR1293-13

    Original file (NR1293-13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 September 2013. In addition, the Board considered the ‘advisory opinion furnished by CNO Memo 7220 Ser N130D2/13U0450 dtd 20 May 13, a copy of which is attached. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 10044 12

    Original file (10044 12.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 August 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNO Memo 7220 Ser Ni30D2/12U1287 dtd 11 Jul 13, a copy of which is...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR1608-13

    Original file (NR1608-13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    in addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNO Memo 7220 Ser N130D2/1300473 dtd 23 May 13, a copy of which is attached. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 05852-12

    Original file (05852-12.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 March 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNO Memo 7220 Ser N130D2/12U0862 dtd 2 Jul 12, a copy of which is attached.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 11504 12

    Original file (11504 12.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 August 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted _of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNO Memo 7220 Ser N130D2/1300078 dtd 7 Feb 13, a copy of which is attached.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR6389 13

    Original file (NR6389 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNO Memo 7220 Ser N130D2/13U1135 Of MME, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying fora correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...