DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORSE
701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD
ARLINGTON, VA 22204
JBH
Docket No. NR322-13
4 September 2013
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval
record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records,
sitting in executive session, considered your application on
3 September 2013. Your allegations of error and injustice were
reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures
applicable to the proceedings of thig Board. Documentary material
considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with
all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board
considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNP Memo 7220 Ser
N130C/13U0596 dated 26 June 2013, a Copy of which ig attached.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record,
“the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to
establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. In
this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments
contained in the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has
been denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be
furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board
reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material evidence
or other matter not previously considered by the Board, In this
regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption of
regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently, when
applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden 1s
on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material
error or injustice. ,
Sincerely,
Rxecutive Di
Enciosure: CNP Memo 7220 Ser N1i30C/1300596 dated 26 June 2013
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 09489 12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 August 2013. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNP Memo 7220 Ser N130C/12U1289 dated 13 November 2012, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR4191 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 December 2013. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNP Memo 7220 Ser N130C2/13U0816 dated 16 September 2013, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2386 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 June 2014. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNP memo 7220 Ser N130C/13U0912 dated 16 October 2013, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2628 14
In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNP memo 7220 Ser N130C4/14U1228 dated 18 September 2014, a copy of which is attached. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. NR2628-14 on of an official naval Consequently, when applying for a correcti demonstrate the existence of record, the burden is on the applicant to probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2478 14
A three-member panel of the Boara for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 October 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. New evidence igs evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1916 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 bJCc Docket No. A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 October 2014. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNP memo 7220 Ser N130C4/14U1218 dated 17 September 2014, a copy of which is attached.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR9699 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 October 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. NPS69S-14 rection of an official naval Consequently, when applying for a cor demonstrate the existence of record, the burden is on the applicant...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 03021 12
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR4696 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 March 2014. your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNP Memo 7220 Ser N130C/13U1070 dated > a copy of which is attached.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 12381 11
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 November 2012. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNP Memo 7220 Ser N130C4/12U0026 dated 10 Feb 12, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.