Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 05737-12
Original file (05737-12.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1004
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2480

JET

Docket No. 5737-12
21 Mar 13 ,

 

 

Dear 2

This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 18 March 2013. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material ‘considered by the Board consisted
of your application, together with all material submitted in
support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes,
regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the

advisory opinion furnished by HQMC Memo 1560 MFR-1 dtd 22 Oct
12, a copy of which is attached.

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire.
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially
coneurred with the comments contained in the advisory opinion.
‘Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and
votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon
request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have
the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
Material evidence or other matter not previously considered by
the Board. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that
a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official
Docket No. 5737-12 °

naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.

Sincerely,
ROBERT D. ZSALMAN

Executive Director
Acting

Enclosure: HOMC Mero 1560 MFR-1 dtd 22 Oct 12

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 05848-12

    Original file (05848-12.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 March 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by HOMC Memo 1560 MFR-1 dtd 22 Oct 12, a copy of which is attached.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2004-13

    Original file (NR2004-13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 October 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by HOMC Memo 1560 MFR dtd 7 May i3, a copy of which is attached.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2239-13

    Original file (NR2239-13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board, Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by HQMC Memo 1560 MFR-1 dtd 21 May 13, a copy of which is attached. ...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2197-13

    Original file (NR2197-13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your: application on 11 October 2013. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by HOMC Memo 1560 MFR-1 dtd 7 May 13, a copy of which is attached. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2329-13

    Original file (NR2329-13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 October 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2692-13

    Original file (NR2692-13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 October 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official Docket No.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 02446-12

    Original file (02446-12.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 March 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. 2446-12 naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 10844 12

    Original file (10844 12.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 August 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by HOMC Memo 1560 MFR dtd 14 Jan 13, a copy of which is attached.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 10397 12

    Original file (10397 12.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 August 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official Docket No.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5037 13

    Original file (NR5037 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 December 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official Docket No.