Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 03944-12
Original file (03944-12.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

701 §, COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490

 

BUG
Docket No: 3944-12
4 September 2012

From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To%* Secretary of the Navy

 
   

REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD

Ref: (a) Title 10 Us8S. Lo52

Encl: (1) DD Form 149 dtd 10 Feb 12 w/attachments
(2) HOMC MMER/PERB memo dtd 6 Apr 12
(3) HOMC MIQ memo dtd 3 Aug 12
(4) Subject’s naval record

1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject
hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed written
application, enclosure (1), with this Board requesting, in
effect, that his naval record be corrected by removing the
fitness report for 1 January to 31 December 2010 (copy at Tab
A), the service record page 11 (‘Administrative Remarks (1070) ”)
entry dated 11 February 2011 (copy in enclosure (1)) and the
Marine Corps Total Force System (MCTFS) entries dated 11
February and 22 August 2011, concerning his assignment to the
weight control program (copies in enclosure eser

2. The Board, consisting of Ms. White-Olson and Messrs. Gattis
and Silberman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and
injustice on 30 August 2012, and pursuant to its regulations,
determined that the limited corrective action indicated below
should be taken on the available evidence of record.
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of the
enclosures, naval records, and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.

3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record
pertaining to Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice,

a. Before applying to the Board, Petitioner exhausted all
administrative remedies which were available under existing law
and regulations within the Department of the Navy.
b. In enclosure (2), the Headquarters Marine Corps (HQMC)
Performance Evaluation Review Board has commented to the effect
that the contested fitness report should stand.

c. In enclosure (3), the HQMC office with cognizance over
page 11 and MCTFS weight control entries has commented to the
effect that the contested page 11 entry and weight control
entries should be removed.

CONCLUSION:

Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and
especially in light of enclosures (2) and (3), the Board finds
an error and injustice warranting the following limited
corrective action:

RECOMMENDATION :

a. That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected by
removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks
(1070)") entry dated 11 February 9011. ‘This is to be
accomplished by physically removing the page 11 on which the
entry appears, or completely obliterating the entry so it cannot
be read, rather than merely lining through it.

b. That his record be corrected further by removing from
his MCTFS data the entries dated 11 February and 22 August 2011,
concerning his assignment to the weight control program.

c. That any material or entries inconsistent with or
relating to the Board's recommendation be corrected, removed or
completely expunged from Petitioner’s record and that no such
entries or material be added to the record in the future.

d. That any material directed to be removed from
Petitioner’s naval record be returned to the Board, together
with a copy of this Report of Proceedings, for retention ina
confidential file maintained for such purpose, with no cross
reference being made a part of Petitioner's naval record.

e. That the remainder of Petitioner’s request be denied.
4. Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the

Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal
Regulations, Section 723.6(c)) it is certified that a quorum was
present at the Board’s review and deliberations, and that the
foregoing is a true and complete record of the Board's
proceedings in the above entitled matter.

Oats bo [PP

JONATHAN S. RUSKIN

ROBERT D. ZSALMAN
Acting Recorder

Recorder

5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section
6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of
Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6 (é) )
and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby
announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken under the

authority of reference (a), has been approved by the Board on
behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.

Rye > i

Ca_w. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 12164-08

    Original file (12164-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to.as Petitioner, filed written application, enclosure {1}, with this Board requesting that his naval record be corrected by removing the fitness report for 1 November 2004 to 31 May 2005 (copy at Tab A) and modifying his Marine Corps Total Force System (MCTFS) data by deleting the weight control entries for 8 February 1997 to 22 March 2000 and 1 March to 25 July 2005 (copy at Tab B).. The Board substantially concurs...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 06893-10

    Original file (06893-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed-enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the fitness reports for 5 April to 31 December 2006 (denied on 20 March 2008, docket number 1029-08), 1 January to 31 December 2007, 1 January to 26 May 2008, 27 May to 30 June 2008, 1 July to 26 September 2008, 27 September to 31 December 2008, 1 January to 8 May 2009 and 9 May to 31...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5272 14

    Original file (NR5272 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board, consisting of Messrs. Hicks, Spooner and Swarens, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 20 November 2014, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. e. In enclosure (6), MIQ again commented to the effect that the contested entry dated 6 January 2012 should stand, but further commented to the effect that Petitioner’s request to remove the entries dated 14 December...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 02803-07

    Original file (02803-07.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    He further requested removal of the fitness report for 20 November 1998 to 31 March 1999 (copy at Tab C in enclosure (1)). d. In enclosure (3), Petitioner added his request to remove the page 11 entry dated 24 March 1999. e. In enclosure (4), the HQMC PERB commented to the effect that the contested fitness report should stand. That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11d (“Administrative Remarks (1070) 7”) entry dated 24 March 1999.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 03941-11

    Original file (03941-11.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board, consisting of Messrs. W. Hicks, Spooner and Swarens, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 18 August 2011, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the limited corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. In enclosure (2), the Headquarters Marine Corps (HOMC) office with cognizance over Petitioner's request to remove the page 11 entry and the MCTFS weight control data has commented to the effect that the page...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 06951 12

    Original file (06951 12.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pout Or ae Se Tg ae é 2 TS DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 §. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed written application, enclosure (1), with this Board requesting, in effect, that her naval record be corrected by removing the ember 2010 to 31 May 2011 (copy at Tab Marine Corps Total Force System A) and removing, from the 25 August (MCTFS), the weight control entry for 25 February to 2011 (copy at...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 02280 12

    Original file (02280 12.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)") entry dated 30 March 2009, a copy of which is at Tab A. That his record be corrected further to restore his AMOS of 8411. c. That his record be corrected further to show his entitlement to SDA pay for 21 July 2010 to 13 June...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 02283-09

    Original file (02283-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed written application, enclosure {1}, with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected by removing the weight control entry for 24 January 2007 to 00000000; changing the “Proficiency” /"Conduct” marks for 31 July 2007, 31 January 2008 and 31 July 2008; and removing the lined through undated service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)")} entry and the page 11...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 12699-10

    Original file (12699-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed written application, enclosure (1), with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected by removing, from the Marine Corps Total Force System (MCTFS), his assignment to weight control from 7 January to 3 June 2000, a copy of which is at Tab A. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Bourgeois, J. Hicks and Ivins, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 10...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 09450-08

    Original file (09450-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Petitioner also requested removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)") entry dated 23 August 2005, a copy of which is at Tab A. The Board, consisting of Ms. Prevatt and and Messrs. Bourgeois and Mann, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 8 October 2008, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. That any material or entries inconsistent with...