Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 00413-12
Original file (00413-12.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490

 

TAL
Docket No: 413-12
27 September 2012

 

This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the
United States Code, section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 26 September 2012. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted
of your application, together with all material submitted in
support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes,
regulations, and policies.

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient
to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice.

You enlisted in the Navy and began a period of active duty on

21 January 1980 at age 19. During recruit training you made a
voluntary written statement that you had failed to disclose pre-
service drug involvement. You stated, in part, that you

wrongfully used marijuana 3,000 times from September 1974
through December 1978 and sold marijuana for profit. Asa
result of your failure to disclose this information, your
commanding officer initiated administrative discharge action by
reason of fraudulent entry as evidenced by your concealment Of
pre-service drug use and sales. You waived your procedural
right to an administrative discharge board (ADB). On 10 April
1980 the commanding officer recommended that you be discharged
with an other than honorable (OTH) characterization of service
due to misconduct (fraudulent enlistment). On 15 April 1980,
you were so discharged.
The Board, in its review of your entire record and application,
carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors, such as
your youth. However, the Board found that these factors were
not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge
due to your failure to disclose your pre-service drug
involvement. The Board noted that you waived your right to an
ADB, your best opportunity for retention or a better
characterization of serviced. Accordingly, your application has
been denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel
will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have
the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
material evidence or other matter not previously considered by
the Board. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that
a presumption of regularity attaches to gill official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official
naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
éxistence of probable material error or injustice.

Sincerely,

 
  
 

W. DEAN PF
Executive D

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 00541 12

    Original file (00541 12.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Subsequently, administrative discharge action was initiated by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 07727-11

    Original file (07727-11.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considere@a your -application on 2 August 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Nevertheless, the Board concluded these factors were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge or a change of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 06728-08

    Original file (06728-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 March 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. On 12 September 1978, you were given a retention warning and informed that further misconduct may not only result in disciplinary action, but an...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07663-09

    Original file (07663-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 May 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. You waived your right to an administrative discharge board (ADB).

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03919-02

    Original file (03919-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 December 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. You were then notified of pending administrative separation action by reason of misconduct due to fraudulent enlistment as evidenced by your failure to disclose your participation in service homosexual acts and...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 05540-07

    Original file (05540-07.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Nevertheless, the Board concluded that these factors were not sufficient to warrant changing the reason for separation since your record clearly shows that during the enlistment processing you disclosed another civil offense that was dismissed, but failed to disclose possession of marijuana...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 05089-10

    Original file (05089-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 March 2011. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Subsequently, administrative discharge action was initiated to separate you by reason of fraudulent entry as evidenced by your concealment of your pre-service...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 04896-09

    Original file (04896-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. As a result of your failure to disclose this information, your commanding officer (CO) initiated administrative discharge action by reason of misconduct due to fraudulent entry. On 25 June 1993, the discharge authority directed that you be discharged by reason of fraudulent enlistment with...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 07464-08

    Original file (07464-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 June 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 03707-10

    Original file (03707-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 February 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Shortly thereafter, on 29 March 1976, you were the subject of an investigation regarding your pre-service drug usage and civil arrests.