DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
Ch
Au
1, :
BAN
Docket No. 06777-11
7 November 2011
From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To: Secretary of the Navy
Subj: REVIEW_OF i“ RECORD Eee SF
Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. 1552
Encl: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments
(2) Naval Personnel Command (NPC) memo 1430 PERS 812 of
13 Cee Le
(3) Subject’s naval record
1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner Filed
enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the
applicable naval record be corrected to show that he advanced to
E-6/081 from the February 2011 Navy-wide Reserve examination and
that his rank was maintained in the active duty component when
he was recalled back on active duty.
>. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and
George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice
on 7 November 2011 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined
that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on
the available evidence of record. Documentary material
considered by the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval
records, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record
pertaining to Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice,
finds as follows:
a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all
administrative remedies available under existing law and
regulations within the Department of the Navy.
b. In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), the office
having cognizance over the subject matter addressed in
Petitioner’s application has commented to the effect that the
request has merit and warrants favorable action.
Docket No. 06777-11
CONCLUSION
Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and
especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board
finds the existence of an injustice warranting the following
corrective action.
RECOMMENDATION :
That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected, where appropriate,
as follows:
a. Petitioner was advanced to E-6/0S1 with an effective
date of 16 July 2011, and a Time In Rate date of 1 July 2011.
b. That a copy of this Report of Proceedings be filed in
Petitioner’s naval record.
4, Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the
Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal
Regulations, Section 723.6(c)) it is certified that quorum was
present at the Board's review and deliberations, and that the
foregoing is a true and complete record of the Board's
proceedings in the above entitled matter.
(shbean $2
ROBERT D. ZSALMAN WILLIAM J. HESS,
Recorder Acting Recorder
5, Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section
6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of
Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(e))
and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby
announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken under the
authority of reference (a), has been approved by the Board on
behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.
7 November 2011 \Wenn
Executive or
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 03506-11
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced to E-7/CMC, with an effective date of 16 November 2009. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and George reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 13 June 2011 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 05834 12
—_ DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE RD SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON VA 22204-2490 BAN Docket: 05834-12 13 November 2012 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICO '? Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced from the March 2011...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 00402 12
00402-12 12 March 2012 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD 2 ae Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he was selection board eligible from the E-7/QMC January 2011 Navy-wide advancement examination and was selected for advancement. The Board, consisting of Messrs....
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 08321 12
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE RD SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON VA 22204-2490 BAN Docket: 08321-12 13 November 2012 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICO [? Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced from the September 2011...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR7714 13
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced to E-6 from the August 2011 Navy-wide Reserve advancement cycle. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman and Rxnicios reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 22 November 2013 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 06705-11
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval vecora be corrected to show a backdated advancement to E-4/IT3 from either the March 2010 or September 2010 Navy-wide advancement exam. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and George reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 6 September 2011 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2889 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he was advanced to ET1/E6 from the March 2011 Navy-wide advancement exam. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Ruskin and George reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 4 August 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on.the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 10176-10
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he was advanced to E-6/HM1 from the September 2009, Navy-wide advancement examination. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 28 February 2011 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 12586 11
12586-11 24 February 2012 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD OF {ig Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he advanced to E-6/DC1 from the March 2011 Navy-wide advancement examination. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and George reviewed...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 06679 12
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced from the August 2010 E-5/IS2 Navy-wide Reserve advancement examination cycle. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Ruskin, George and Exnicios reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 5 November 2012 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated...