DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5160
MEH
é Docket No. 5428-11
8 Aug 11
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records,
sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 August
2011. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in
accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable
to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by
the Board consisted of your application, together with all material
submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable
statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered
the advisory opinion furnished by CNO memo 7220 Ser Ni30D2/110 0612 of
25 Jul 11, a copy of which is attached.
Biter careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record,
the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to
establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. In
“this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments
contained in the advisory opinion. You previously petitioned the
Naval Discharge and Review Board (NDRB) regarding the character of
service and narrative reason for separation reflected on your DD 214.
The NDRB upgraded the character of service to “Honorable” and changed
the narrative reason for separation to “Secretarial Authority.” The
NDRB also determined the separation code (Block 26) should reflect
“JFE” vice “IDA.” Recoupment of the unearned portion of the bonus is
warranted by this code. Accordingly, your application, and your
request for a personal appearance before the Board, have been denied.
The names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished wpon
request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board
reconsider its decision upon submissibn of new and material evidence
or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
Docket ‘No. 5428-11
In this regard, it is also important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of
probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
Ly Doane?
W. DEAN PFET R
Executive Di t
Enclosure
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 05428-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 1 February 2011. In addition, the Board considered the report of the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB), a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05428-01
Your allegations of error and A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 May 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of together with all material submitted in support The After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05428-02
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 1133 Ser is attached. SNM enlisted before 26 Jul 2000.
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 05428-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 April 2010. You received the OTH discharge on 25 June 1984 for misconduct (drug abuse), and were assigned an RE- 4 reenlistment code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08665-00
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF 2 NAVY ANNE NA’JAL RECORD X S WASHINGTON DC 20370.510 0 TJR Docket No: 8665-00 11 June 2001 This is in reference to your naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United States Code, Section 1552. applicatilon for correction of your A three-member panel of the Board for Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 June 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance regulations and procedures applicable to the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 11291-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 August 2011. Nevertheless, the Board concluded these factors were not sufficient to warrant a change of your reenlistment status because of your failure to satisfactorily attend scheduled drills and misconduct as evidenced by your failure to pay just debts and misuse of a government credit card. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 05157-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 February 2011. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06070-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 March 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 26 March 1996, this Board denied your requests for further recharacterization of your service, and changes in your narrative reason for...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR3446-13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 February 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in Support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official - naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR775 13
Since your discharge is less than 15 years old, you may apply to the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) for a change to your character of service and narrative reason for separation. A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 October 2013. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or...