DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 100%
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490
BIG
Docket No: 3423-11
19 January 2012
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the
United States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 5 January 2012. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted
o£ your application, together with all material submitted in
support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes,
regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the
report of the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB), a copy of
which is attached.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially
concurred with the comments and findings contained in the report
of the NDRB. You are advised that no discharge is automatically
upgraded due merely to remorse, the passage of time, or post
service good conduct. Accordingly, your application has been
denied. - The names and votes of the members of the panel will be
furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have
the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
material evidence or other matter not previously considered by
the Board. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that
a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official
naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFELRF
Executive D r
JEriclosure
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 04150-11
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 1] January 2012. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 03468-11
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 February 2012. In addition, the Board considered the report of the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB), a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 01365 12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 November 2012. In addition, the Board considered the report of the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB), a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error oF injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5170 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 April 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. You exercised your procedural right to have your case heard by an administrative discharge board (ADB).
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR1449-13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 February 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 05640 11
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 February 2012. The Board believed you were fortunate to have received a general discharge, since normally, when an individual has committed misconduct, he will be separated and assigned an other than honorable characterization of service. Since your discharge is less than 15 years old, you may apply the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) for a possible upgrade.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2321-13
of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 January 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in -support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, thé burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 05897-11
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 March 2012. On 10 August 2006, you were notified of pending administrative separation with an other than honorable (OTH) discharge due to unsatisfactory participation. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 05858 11
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 March 2012. On 10 December 1999, you were discharged with a general characterization of service due to your diagnosed personality disorder and assigned an RE-4 reenlistment code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 09464 12
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Nevertheless, the Board concluded these factors were not sufficient to warrant changing your reentry code given your record of three NJP’s, conviction by SCM, and the fact that you were counseled and warned of the consequences of further misconduct after your third NUP. The Board did not...