DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490
BJG
Docket No: 3150-11
15 February 2012
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the
United States Code, section 1552.
You requested removing the fitness report for 1 October 2009 to
14 July 2010.
It is noted that the Commandant of the Marine Corps (CMC) has
directed modifying the contested report by changing the entry in
section K.2 (reviewing officer’s “Evaluation”) from “Do Not
Concur’ ta “Concur.”
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 15 February 2012. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted
of your application, together with all material submitted in
support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes,
regulations and policies. The Board also considered the report
of the Headquarters Marine Corps Performance Evaluation Review
Board (PERB), dated 17 March 2011, a copy of which is attached.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially
concurred with the comments contained in the report of the PERB.
Accordingly, your application for relief other than or beyond
that effected by CMC has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have
the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
material evidence or other matter not previously considered by
the Board. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that
a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official
naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
la ‘DEAN PF Ate
Executive Dire
Enclosure
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8611 13
— Tt is noted that the Commandant of the Marine Corps (CMC) has directed modifying the contested fitness report for 2 June 2011 to 28 February 2012 by filing a Memorandum for the Record showing that section A, item 6.a (“Commendatory Material”) is marked, and including in section I (reporting senior’s “Directed and Additional Comments”) “Directed Comments: Item 6A: MRO [Marine reported on] was awarded a Meritorious Mast and two Letters of Appreciation during this reporting period.” A...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 00070-12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 February 2012. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 00084-12
It is noted that the Commandant of the Marine Corps (CMC) has directed modifying the report for 1 January to 12 May 2009 by removing, from section I (reporting senior’s “Directed and Additional Comments”), “Upon completion of his scheduled PME [Professional Military Education] .” A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 February 2012. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 08548 12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 October 2012. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2813 14
It is noted that the Commandant of the Marine Corps (cMc) has directed modifying the contested report by removing, from section I (reporting senior’s “Directed and additional Comments”), “-SNM (Subject named Marine] execute supervision and follow up.” and “ direction.” A three-member panel Records, sitting in executive gession, considered your application on 24 April 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 05948-12
It is noted that the Commandant of the Marine Corps (CMC) has directed modifying the contested report by changing the entry in section A, item 3.a (“Occasion”) from “GC” (grade change) to “DC” (directed by CMC) and removing, from section K.4 (reviewing officer comments), “and reduced in rank to Corporal.” A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 September 2012. Documentary material considered by the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2724 14
You requested completely removing the fitness report for 2 June to 19 October 2012. , It is noted that the Commandant of the Marine Corps {CMC) has directed modifying the contested report by removing, from section I (reporting senior’s “Directed and Additional Comments”), “After spending an extended period of time outside his primary MOS [military occupational specialty], SNM [Subject named Marine] worked diligently through the reporting period to regain his MOS proficiency and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2015 | NR1053 15
In addition, the Board considered the report of the Headquarters Marine Corps Performance Evaluation Review Board (PERB), dated 3 February 2015, a copy of which is attached. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 06644 12
SNM [Subject Named Marine] received a Letter of Appreciation and Certificate of Appreciation during the reporting period.” A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 October 2012. The Board also considered the reports of the Headquarters Marine Corps Performance Evaluation Review Board (PERB), dated 6 April and 19 June 2012, copies of which are attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5184 14
It is noted that the Commandant of the Marine Corps (CMC) has directed modifying the contested report for 1 July to 12 December 2008 by changing the date in section A, item 3.b (beginning date) from *20080701" to “20081002” {and filing in your record an administrative filler for 1 July to 1 October 2008} and modifying the report for 13 December 2008 to 19 May 2009 by removing, from section I (reporting senior’s “Directed ana Additional Comments”), all but the first sentence and in section K...