Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 02788-11
Original file (02788-11.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

 

MEE
Docket No. 2788-11
1i Juhl il

From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To: Secretary of the Navy

Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICO

Ref: (a) Tatle 10 U.S.C. 1552

Enci: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments
(2) CNRC memo 1133 Ser N323 of 24 Jun il
(3) Subject’s naval record

1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter
referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board

requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected
to show enlistment in paygrade E-2.

2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Exnicios, George, and Pfeiffer,
reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 11 July
2011 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective
action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of
record. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of the

enclosures, naval records, and applicable statutes, regulations and
policies. ‘

3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining to
Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice, finds as follows:

a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all
administrative remedies available under existing law and regulations
within the Department of the Navy.

b. In correspondence attached as enclosure (2}, the office
having cognizance over the subject matter addressed in Petitioner's

application has commented to the effect that the request has merit and
warrants favorable action.

CONCLUSION

Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and

especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board finds

the existence of an injustice warranting the following corrective
action.
Docket No. 2788-11

RECOMMENDATION :

That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected, where appropriate, to
show that:

a. She was enlisted in paygrade E-2 effective 12 May 2010
{Active Duty Service Date). She was further advanced to paygrade E-3
effective 16 February 2011. Petitioner met the advanced paygrade
criteria based on college credits.

b. She was not reduced to paygrade E-1 on or about 9 November
(2010, after disenrollment from the Nuclear Field Program (she had
previously been enlisted in paygrade E-3 under the provisions of the
Nuclear Field Program).

c. A copy of this Report of Proceedings will be filed in
Petitioner’s naval record.

4. It is certified that quorum was present at the Board's review and

deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true complete record of the
Board's proceedings in the above entitled matter.

putea fe

ROBERT D. ZSALMAN WILLTAM oO. HESS, TIL
Recorder Acting Recorder
5. Purguant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e)

of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records
(32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6{e)) and having assured
compliance with its provisions, it is hereby announced that the
foregoing corrective action, taken under the authority of reference

 
 
 
   
  

11 July 2011 Lo’

» J
W. DEAN “hyd
t ty

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 12497-10

    Original file (12497-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show enlistment in paygrade E-3, vice E-1. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Exnicios, Pfeiffer, and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 4 April 2011 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 03241-10

    Original file (03241-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    3241-10 26 Apr 10 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj]: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICO Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show he enlisted in paygrade E-3. The Board, consisting of Messrs. George, Pfeiffer, and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 01606-11

    Original file (01606-11.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 MEH Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show execution of a 24 month extension to comply with, and receive the benefits of, the Advanced Electronics Field (AEF) Program. The Board, consisting of Messrs. George, Pfeiffer,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 01378 12

    Original file (01378 12.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show she enlisted in paygrade E-3, vice E-1. The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. Zsalman, and Mr. George, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 1 October 2012 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 05905-11

    Original file (05905-11.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show enlistment in paygrade E-2, vice E-1. The Board, consisting of Messrs. George, Pfeiffer, and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 29 August 2011 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 06070-11

    Original file (06070-11.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 MEH Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show enlistment in paygrade E-2, vice E-1. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Exnicios, George, and Pfeiffer, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 11 July 2011...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 00599-11

    Original file (00599-11.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 MEH Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to an Enlistment Bonus for Source Rate (EBSR) . The Board, consisting of Messrs. George, Pfeiffer, and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 05642-10

    Original file (05642-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-51 00 MEH Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show he enlisted for a 4 year term, with a concurrent 24 month extension. The Board, consisting of Messrs. George, Pfeiffer, and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 02523-11

    Original file (02523-11.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to validate her September 2010 cycle 208, Navy-wide advancement examination and show that she met the criteria to be advanced to E-5/A0Q2. Security clearance is understood to 2 Docket No. The Board determined the following: The following factors militated in favor of relief: The Board was convinced that Petitioner and the Navy were...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06036-01

    Original file (06036-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    1552 Encl: (1) (2) (3) DD Form 149 w/attachments NPC Subject’s naval record n~emorand~~n~ 5420 Pers 4010 of 24 September 2001 Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be 1. filed enclosure corrected to modify a 24 month extension. il!justice on 30 October 2001 and, pursuant to its Zsalman, and Ms. Hare, reviewed 3. Member executed the 24 month extension for...