DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
WJH
Docket: 1926-11
18 Apr 2011
This is in reference to your application for correction of
naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 18 April 2011. Your allegations of error
and injustice were reviewed in accordance with the
administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered
by the Board consisted of your application, together with
all material submitted in support thereof, your naval
record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion
furnished by the Naval Supply Systems Command letter 4050
Ser 53H/021 of 25 March 2011, a copy of which is attached.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable
material error or injustice. In this connection the Board
substantially concurred with the comments contained in the
advisory opinion. The Board simply found insufficient
evidence to support your claim that your household goods
weighed less that your 11,000 pound allowance/entitlement.
Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names
and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished
upon request.
Docket: 1926-11
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are
such that favorable action cannot be taken. You are
entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon
submission of new and material evidence or other matter not
previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is
also important to keep in mind that a presumption of
regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently,
when applying for a correction of an official naval record,
the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence
of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PF]
Executive r
1 e3|
NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | NC9800999
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Since you were only 16 years old, you requested discharge from the Naval Reserve.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 01912-11
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 April 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 01521-11
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 August 2011. in addition, the Board considered the advisory opinions furnished by the Chief of Navy Chaplains dated 31 May 2011 and the Navy Personnel Command dated 27 June 2011, copies of which are attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 05387-11
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 July 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable Statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 01948-11
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 July 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Comsequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 03446-11
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 July 2011. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by the Navy Personnel Command dated 18 May 2011 with attachment, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 04919-11
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 June 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 01867-11
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 July 2011. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board, Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 07380-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 April 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 09730-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 April 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, his naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...