Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 01786-11
Original file (01786-11.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX

WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

 

HD:hd
Docket No. 01786-11
1 April 2011

From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
Toe Secretary of the Navy

ga Ra TEE IES

REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD

 

Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. 1552
Encl: (1) DD Form 149 dtd 8 Feb 11 w/attachments
(2) PERS-32 memo dtd 11 Mar 11

1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject,
hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this
Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be
corrected by removing the fitness report for 12 March 2009 to 31 May
2010, a copy of which is at Tab A.

2. The Board, consisting of Mses. Aldrich and Trucco and Mr. Boyd,
reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 31 March
2011, and pursuant toits regulations, determined that the corrective
action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of
record. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
the enclosures and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.

3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining
to Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice, finds as follows:

a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all

administrative remedies available under existing law and regulations
within the Department of the Navy.

b. In correspondence at enclosure (2), the Navy Personnel
Command office having cognizance over the matter of this case
commented to the effect the request has merit and warrants favorable
action.

CONCLUSION: .

Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and
especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board finds
the existence of an injustice warranting the following corrective
action.

RECOMMENDATION :

 

a. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected by removing
therefrom the following fitness report and related material:

Period of Report

Date of Report Reporting Senior From » a
15Juni10 eR AS Nl: 12Mar09 31May10
b. That there be inserted in Petitioner's naval record a

memorandum in place of the removed report containing appropriate
identifying data concerning the report; that the memorandum state
that the report has been removed by order of the Secretary of the
Navy in accordance with the provisions of federal law and may not
be made available to selection boards and other reviewing
authorities; and that such boards may not conjecture or draw any
inference as to the nature of the report.

c. That any material or entries inconsistent with or relating
to the Board's recommendation be corrected, removed or completely
expunged from Petitioner's record and that no such entries or
material be added to the record in the future.

d. That any material directed to be removed from Petitioner's
naval record be returned to the Board, together with a copy of this
Report of Proceedings, for retention in a confidential file
maintained for such purpose, with no cross reference being made a
part of Petitioner's naval record.

4. It is certified that a quorum was present at the Board's review

and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and complete
record of the Board's proceedings in the above entitled matter.

Lanathon¢- lark

 

ROBERT D. ZSALMAN JONATHAN S. RUSKIN
Recorder Acting Recorder
5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e)

of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records
(32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(e)) and having assured
compliance with its provisions, it is hereby announced that the
foregoing corrective action, taken under the authority of reference
(a), has been approved by the Board on behalf of the Secretary of

the Navy.
Ww. D

EAN PFET

 

Executive Di

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 06664-11

    Original file (06664-11.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board, consisting of Ms. Aldrich and Messrs. Pfeiffer and Spain, reviewed Pétitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 8 September 2011, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the limited corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)") entry dated 26 October 2010. That any material or entries inconsistent with...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 03187-11

    Original file (03187-11.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed written application, enclosure (1), with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected by modifying the fitness report for 22 June 2008 to 31 March 2009 (copy at Tab A) by removing section K (reviewing officer's (RO’s) marks and comments). Enclosure (2) reflects that the Headquarters Marine Corps (HOMC) Performance Evaluation Review Board has directed the requested...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 12173-10

    Original file (12173-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the detachment for cause (DFC) from duty as Commanding Officer, Mine Countermeasures Crew PERSISTENT, requested by the Commander, Mine Countermeasures Squadron TWO letter of 3 March 2009 and approved by the Commander, Navy Personnel Command (NPC) letter of 9 September 2009. In...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 03443 12

    Original file (03443 12.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S,. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by completely removing the fitness report for 18 June 2007 to 31 May 2008 (copy at Tab A), modified in his previous case by the Headquarters Marine Corps (HQMC) Performance Evaluation Review Board (PERB) by removal of section K...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 10575-10

    Original file (10575-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the fitness report for 1 January to 31 December 2007 (copy at Tab A) and the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)"”) entries dated 14 and 15 February 2008 with Petitioner’s rebuttal dated 19 February 2008 (copies at Tab B). Aldrich and Trucco and Mr. Boyd, reviewed...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR4526 13

    Original file (NR4526 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the fitness report for 1 April to 31 December 2011 (copy at Tab A), the Marine Corps Total Force System (MCTFS) entry reflecting his assignment to the Body Composition Program (BCP) from 4 August 2011 to 1 March 2012, and the service record page 11 counseling entry he received “due to...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR0593 13

    Original file (NR0593 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the fitness report for 1 to 29% April 2011 (copy at Tab A), removing the service record page 1i (*Administrative Remarks (1070)") entries dated 1 December 2010 and 10 May 2011 (copies at Tab 3) and changing his reenlistment code from RE-3C (Commandant of the Marine Corps...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4745 14

    Original file (NR4745 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 7O! c. Enclosure (2), the report of the HOMC PERB in Petitioner's case, shows that the PERB directed removing the contested fitness report for 1 January to 27 April 2008, but commented to the effect that the five remaining reports at issue should stand. In enclosure (5), Petitioner provided new evidence in support of his new request to remove the page 11 entries dated 11 June 2010 and 12 May 2011. g. In enclosures (6) and (7),...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 03941-11

    Original file (03941-11.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board, consisting of Messrs. W. Hicks, Spooner and Swarens, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 18 August 2011, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the limited corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. In enclosure (2), the Headquarters Marine Corps (HOMC) office with cognizance over Petitioner's request to remove the page 11 entry and the MCTFS weight control data has commented to the effect that the page...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 01174-08

    Original file (01174-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the fitness reports for 1 February to 10 May 2006 (copy in enclosure (1)), 11 May 2006 to 31 January 2007 (copy at Tab A) and 1 February to 31 July 2007 (copy at Tab B). The Board, consisting of Ms. Humberd and Messrs. Pfeiffer and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error...