Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 00986-11
Original file (00986-11.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

 

JSR
Docket No. 00986-11

7 April 2011

 

From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
Tow Secretary of the Navy
Subj: ileal
RECORD
Ref: (a) 10:°U.S.€, 2552
Encl: (1) DD Form 149 dtd 7 Jan 11
(2) HOMC MMPR memo dtd 17 Feb 11
(3) HOMC MMSR-5 memo dtd 10 Mar 11
(4) Subject’s naval record

1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject,
hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with
this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval
record be corrected to show that he accepted a commission as a
captain in the Marine Corps Reserve on 26 July 2010, the date of
his discharge from the Regular Marine Corps; and that his record
be corrected further to show he was promoted to major in the
Marine Corps Reserve with the date of rank and effective date he
would have received, had he been commissioned in the Marine
Corps Reserve without a break in service.

2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Green, Pfeiffer and Vogt,
reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 7
April 2011, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the
corrective action indicated below should be taken on the
available evidence of record. Documentary material considered
by the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and

applicable statutes, regulations and polienes:.

3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record
pertaining to Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice,

finds as follows:

a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all
administrative remedies available under existing law and
regulations within the Department of the Navy.
b. In enclosures (2) and (3), the Headquarters Marine Corps
offices with cognizance over the subject matter of Petitioner's
case have commented to the effect the request has merit and
warrants favorable action. Enclosure (2) specifically
recommends correcting his record to show he was promoted to
major with a date of rank (and by implication, effective date)
of 1 November 2010.

CONCLUSION:

Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and
especially in light of the contents of enclosures (2) and (3),
the Board finds the existence of an error and injustice
warranting partial relief. In light of enclosure (3), the Board
finds Petitioner's record should be corrected to show he was
commissioned in the Marine Corps Reserve on 27 July 2010, the
day after his discharge from the Regular Marine Corps, rather
than 26 July 2010, the date he specifically requested. In light
of enclosure (2), the Board finds his record should be corrected
further to show he was promoted to major in the Marine Corps
Reserve with a date of rank and effective date of 1 November
2010. In view of the above, the Board directs the following
limited corrective action:

RECOMMENDATION:

a. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected to show he
accepted a commission as a captain in the Marine Corps Reserve
on 27 July 2010; and that his anniversary date and pay entry
base date be established accordingly.

b. That his record be corrected further to show he was
promoted to major in the Marine Corps Reserve with a date of
rank and effective date of 1 November 2010; and that his lineal
precedence be adjusted accordingly.

c. That any material or entries inconsistent with or
relating to the Board's recommendation be corrected, removed or
completely expunged from Petitioner's record and that no such
entries or material be added to the record in the future.

d. That any material directed to be removed from
Petitioner's naval record be returned to the Board, together
with a copy of this Report of Proceedings, for retention ina
confidential file maintained for such purpose, with no cross
reference being made a part of Petitioner's naval record.
e. That the remainder of Petitioner's request be denied.

4. Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the
Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal
Regulations, Section 723.6(c)) it is certified that a quorum was
present at the Board's review and deliberations, and that the
foregoing is a true and complete record of the Board's
proceedings in the above entitled matter.

pvt”: Baath ey

ROBERT D. ZSALMAN “JONATHAN S. RUSKIN

Recorder Acting Recorder
5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section

6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of
Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(e))
and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby
announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken under the
authority of reference (a), has been approved by the Board on
behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.

TRAD, od __

Teor_W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 08712-10

    Original file (08712-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that the date of rank and effective date of his promotion to captain be adjusted from 1 June 2008 to reflect selection by the Fiscal Year (FY) 2007 Captain Selection Board, rather than the FY 2009 Reserve Captain Selection Board. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Clemmons, Sproul and Washington, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 11597-09

    Original file (11597-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 4 February 2010, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. In enclosure (2), the Headquarters Marine Corps (HOMC) Career Management Team has commented to the effect that Petitioner should have been ineligible for consideration by the FY 2008 Reserve Major Selection Board, convened on 23 January 2007, as he should have been placed on the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 09847-09

    Original file (09847-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DG 20370-5100 JSR Docket No. 09847-09 10 December 2009 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Sub):

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 08270-09

    Original file (08270-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 BIG Docket No: 8270-09 14 August 2009 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Sub] : “eee ar eet REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: (a} Title 10 U.S.C. 1552: Encl: (1) DD Form 149 dtd 18 Mar 09 w/attachments (2) HQMC MMER/PERB memo dtd 26 Jun 09 (3) HOMC MMOA-4 memo dtd 21 Jul 09 (4) Subject’s naval record Pursuant to the provisions of reference-(a),...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3482 14

    Original file (NR3482 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show the lineal position, date of rank, and effective date in the grade of major he would have been assigned had he been selected for promotion to that grade by the Fiscal Year (FY) 2013 Major Selection Board, vice the FY 2014 Major Selection Board. CONCLUSION: Upon review and consideration of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 09077-07

    Original file (09077-07.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    By letter dated 7 June 2005, the Commandant of the Marine Corps (CMC) recommended to the Secretary of the Navy (SECNAV) that Petitioner’s name be withheld from the FY 2006 Colonel Promotion List. This advisory stated he was withheld from the FY 2006 promotion list because of the adverse fitness report (which had not yet been removed), and that without the report, his record is “obviously competitive.” Petitioner was not considered by the FY 2007 Colonel Selection Board. p. Enclosure (15)...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 06659-12

    Original file (06659-12.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show he was discharged from the U. The Board, consisting of Messrs. W. Hicks, Spooner and Swarens, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 13 September 2012, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 04738-09

    Original file (04738-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show he was granted a commission in the Marine Corps Reserve on 30 September 2008. The Board, consisting of Messrs. W. Hicks, Swarens and Washington, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 18 June 2009, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR8699 14

    Original file (NR8699 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 01 S, COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 HD Docket No. a warrants favorable CONCLUSION: evidence of record, and consideration of all the and (3), the Upon review and he contents of enclosures (2) especially in light of t Board finds an injustice RECOMMENDATION : That Petitioner's naval record be corrected, where f rank and effective date in the grade vice 1 May 2014; and that his lineal a. appropriate, tos of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 02369-10

    Original file (02369-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board, consisting of Messrs. Dunn, Garst and Grover, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 18 November 2010, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. In correspondence attached as enclosures (2) through (5), the Headquarters Marine Corps offices with cognizance over the subject matter of this case have commented to the effect that Petitioner's requests concerning the...