DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 °
SUN
Docket No: 00909-11
3 March 2011
From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To's Secretary of the Navy
Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD hn a,
Ret : (a) 10 U.8.€. 1552
Encl: (1) DD Form 149 with attachments
(2) Case Summary
(3) Subject's naval record
1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, an
active duty enlisted member of the Navy, filed enclosure (1) with
this Board requesting that his administrative discharge of
25 July 2010 by reason unsatisfactory participation in the Ready
Reserve, be removed from his Official Military Personnel File
(OMPF) .
2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Exnicios, Mr. Pfeiffer, ana
Mr. Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and
injustice on 3 March 2011 and, pursuant to its regulations,
determined that the corrective action indicated below should be
taken on the available evidence of record. Documentary material
considered by the Board consisted of the enclosures, nava
records, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining
to Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice finds as
follows:
a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all
administrative remedies available under existing law and
regulations within the Department of the Navy.
b. Petitioner enlisted in the Navy and began a period of
active duty on 10 October 2007. He served until 9 June 2009 when
he was honorably released from active duty and transferred to the
Navy Reserve with a reserve obligation until 29 August 2015. On
June 26 2010, his command forwarded a letter to the separation
authority recommending that he be administratively separated
under honorable conditions due to unsatisfactory participation in
the Ready Reserve. On 28 June 2010, e separation authority
concurred and directed that he be separated. He received a
general discharge on 25 July 2010. However, a letter from the
Commanding Officer (CO), Navy Operational Support Center, San
Diego, California, to the Navy Standard Integrated Personnel
System (NSIPS) help desk stated that Petitioner was erroneously
discharged from the Navy Reserve on 25 July 2010 due to an
administrative oversight and requested that that the error be
corrected. Also, his CO stated that they were faking corrective
measures to ensure this type of administrative error does not
occur in the future.
CONCLUSION:
Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and
especially in light of the supporting letter from Petitioner's
co, the Board concludes that his request warrants favorable
action in the form of relief.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board concludes that Petitioner’s administrative
discharge by reason unsatisfactory participation in the Ready
Reserve be removed from his OMPF.
RECOMMENDATION:
a. That Petitioner's administrative discharge of 25 July
2010 by reason unsatisfactory participation in the Ready Reserve
and all other documentation related to it be removed from his
b. That any material or entries inconsistent with or
relating to the Board's recommendation be corrected, removed or
completely expunged from Petitioner’s record and that no such
entries or material be added to the record im the future.
c. That any material direct to be removed from Petitioner’s
naval record be returned to this Board, together with a copy of
this Report of Proceedings, for retention in a confidential file
maintained for such purpose, with no cross reference being made a
part of Petitioner's naval record.
4. Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the
Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal
Regulations, Section 723.6(c) it is certified that a quorum was
present at the Board's review and deliberations, and that the
foregoing is a true and complete record of the Board's
proceedings in the above entitled matter.
CA ition. Dr
ROBERT D. ZSALMAN BRIAN J.“ GEORGE
Recorder Acting Recorder
5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section
6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of
Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulation, Section 723.6 (e))
and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby
announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken under the
authority of reference (a), has been approved by the Board on
behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.
Wao
Executive D gj
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 02302-11
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 SIN Docket No: 02302-11 14 March 2011 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Ref: (a) 10 U.8.€, 1552 Encl: (1) DD Form 149 with attachments (2) Case Summary (3) Subject's naval record 1. The Board, consisting of Mr. Exnicios, Mr. Pfeiffer, and Mr, Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 11 March 2011 and, pursuant to its...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 12438-10
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 TOR Docket No: 12438-10 7 July 2011 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW NAVAL RECORD oF iii] E -¥ : : Ref: fa) 1060 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy Reserve, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that his RE-4 (nonrecommendation for retention) reenlistment code...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 10319 12
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy Reserve, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that his administrative discharge of 25 March 2011 be removed from his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF). The Board, consisting of Mr. Exnicios, Mr. Pfeiffer, and Mr. ZSalman, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 29 November 2012 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 01691-08
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 TRG Docket No: 1691-08 29 December 2008 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD OFigi Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, an enlisted member of the Navy, filed an application with this Board requesting removal from his record of documentation showing that he received a general...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3314 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 100i ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 SIN = Docket No: 3314-14 18 September 2014 *, From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD OF Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy Reserve, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that his discharge of 8 November 2013, _be...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 04012-11
The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. Exnicios, and Mr. Hess, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 13 April 2011 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. b. Petitioner enlisted in the Navy Reserve on 10 February 1998.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04582-00
In spite of the fact that (Petitioner) was reporting for drill on the first weekend, the muster sheets for the first weekend were never annotated to show his reporting. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected to show that he 3 was not discharged on 7 November 1999 but continued to be a member of the Marine Corps Reserve; That Petitioner be further corrected to show that he was b. credited with four pay drills in December 1997 and February and June 1999 and in any other months in 1999...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 09564-09
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to remove documentation showing he was separated from.the Navy Reserve for "unsatisfactory performance." The Board, consisting of Ms. LeBlanc and Messrs. Grover and McBride, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 7 January 2010, and pursuant to its regulations, determined...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 08220-07
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 TRG Docket No: 8220-07 5. May 2008 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD OF ‘fil Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.c. 1552 Encl: (1) Case Summary (2) Subject's naval record 1.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06596-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Naval Reserve, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that he be reinstated in the Naval Reserve. His overall record while he In view of the foregoing, the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting the following corrective action. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected to show that he was not discharged on 20 June 2001 but transferred to the IRR and recommended for...