DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON BDC 20370-5100
CRS
Docket No: 639-11
26 January 2011
~~
a
o
a _
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
tiaval record pursuant tio the provisions of Title 10 of the United
States Code section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 26 January 2011. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.
after careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 12 March 2008.
While the discharge processing documents were not available to
the Board, it appears that you requested to be discharged. On 13
May 2008 you received an entry level geparation by reason of a
condition, not a disability, that interfered with your
performance of duty. You were assigned a reentry code of RE-4,
as permitted by regulatory guidance.
The Board concluded that you failed to demonstrate that you were
improperly assigned a reentry code of RE-4. Your belief that a
second chance is warranted in your case was considered
insufficient to warrant changing that code. Accordingly, your
application has been denied. The names and votes of the members
of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
#
on ae,
aan,
‘ty,
am:
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 05269-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 January 2011. The Board, in its review of your entire record and application, carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors, such as your youth and desire to change your reentry code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the ‘existence of probab¥e material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 13757-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 January 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 12456-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval - Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 August 2011. In connection with this processing, you would have acknowledged the separation action and the discharge authority would have approved a recommendation for separation. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 00003-11
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 February 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval ‘record, the burden #s on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 08012-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 April 2011. However, the Board found these factors were insufficient to warrant changing your narrative reason for separation or reentry code due to your diagnosed adjustment disorder. The Board thus concluded that there is no error or injustice in your reason for separation or RE-4 reentry code.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 13144-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 February 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 08338-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 April 2011. The Board thus concluded that there is no error or injustice in your reentry code which was correctly assigned under your circumstances. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 07483-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 March 2011. On 26 June 2008, you received a general discharge for alcohol rehabilitation failure, and were assigned an RE-4 (not recommended for reenlistment) reentry code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 06338-10
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 SIN Docket No: 06338-10 4 doril 2011 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10, United States Code, section 1552. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policiee. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 02974-11
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 May 2011. That you no longer suffer from chronic tibial pain does not demonstrate that you were discharged in error, or provide a basis for amending your reentry code, which is the most favorable code that you could have received as a Sailor being discharged by reason of physical disability. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval...