Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 00438-11
Original file (00438-11.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DG 20370-5100
TUR
Docket No: 438-11
21 October 2011

 

This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United
States Code, Section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 18 October 2011. The names and votes of the
members of the panel will be furnished upon request. Your
allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance -
with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by
the Board consisted of your application, together with ail
material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and

applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.

after careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.

You enlisted in the Navy on 19 August 2003 at age 19, began a
period of active duty on 5 August 2004, and served without
disciplinary incident. However, on 17 August 2004, you were
referred for a mental health evaluation due to your recurrent
suicidal thoughts as evidenced by you squeezing a chain around
your throat. The psychiatric report stated, in part, that you
were depressed, felt hopeless, anxious, and socially withdrawn,
and were experiencing poor concentration and low esteem. You
were diagnosed with an adjustment disorder with mixed anxiety and
a depressed mood, a condition that significantly impaired your
ability to function effectively. You were recommended for and
acknowledged an expeditious administrative separation. You were
also advised that you were not recommended for retention and were
ineligible for reenlistment due to the diagnosed psychological
condition. ~

On 20 August 2004 you were notified of pending separation action
by reason of convenience of the government due to the diagnosed

physical or mental condition that was not a disability. At that
time you did not object to the separation and waived your
procedural rights. On 30 August 2004 the discharge authority
directed your commanding officer to issue an uncharacterized
entry level separation and to assign an RE-4 reenlistment code,
and on 7 September 2004, you were 50 separated.

The Board concluded that your nonrecommendation for retention,
ineligibility for reenlistment due to the diagnosed physical or
mental condition, specifically, an adjustment disorder, and the
assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code were administratively and
procedurally correct. Accordingly, your application has been
denied.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.

Sincerely,

W. DEAN Tee
Executive rector

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 06128-10

    Original file (06128-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 March 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. The Board concluded that your nonrecommendation for retention, ineligibility for reenlistment due to the diagnosed physical or mental condition,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05189-08

    Original file (05189-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Sincerely, LN a © W. DEAN PFEIFF Executive Dire Enclosures DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 TIR Docket No: 5189-08 7 August 2008 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj}: REVIEW NAVAL RECORD OF Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. In his application, Petitioner contends that he was misdiagnosed with a personality and adjustment disorder and that the Marine Corps made poor decisions based on his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040000063C070208

    Original file (20040000063C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    He also states (in the application dated 20 August 2004) that he served as an officer while in the military. The applicant provides extracts from his Navy and Army service personnel and medical records; documents regarding medical treatment subsequent to his separation from active duty; extracts from his Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) records; a multitude of additional documents including letters and documents associated with his postal service and education; several VA Rating...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 08010-07

    Original file (08010-07.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 1 October 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Nonetheless, on 16 May 2003, the discharge authority directed an honorable discharge by reason of convenience of the government due to a...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 01286-09

    Original file (01286-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 December 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of ‘your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, ‘and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 09105-03

    Original file (09105-03.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful andconscientiousconsideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.moment of truth you revealed that you had a history of asthma, back problems and suicidal behavior,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 06785-10

    Original file (06785-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 April 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 12117-09

    Original file (12117-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 August 2010. The Board noted that applicable regulations require the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code to individuals who are separated due to erroneous enlistment based on medical conditions that existed prior to entry into the service. Nevertheless, the Board found that these factors were not sufficient to warrant changing your reenlistment code due to...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 02003-08

    Original file (02003-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 December 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06570-09

    Original file (06570-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 TIR Docket No: 6570-09 2 June 2010 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To Secretary of the Navy Subj REVIEW NAVAL RECORD OF Ref (a) 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that his reenlistment code be changed. Further, reference (b) does not specifically authorize...