Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 00055-11
Original file (00055-11.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5160

 

BD:hd
Docket No. 00055-1111
22 duly 2011

From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To: Secretary of the Navy

    
  

=

Subj:

   

REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD

 

Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. 1552
Encl: (1) DD Form 149 dtd 17 Dec 10 w/attachments

(2) PERS-911C ltr dtd 24 May 11
(3) Subject's naval record

1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject,
hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this
Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be
corrected to show she accepted her commission in the Navy Reserve
on 1 October 2010, rather than 22 November 2010; and that her pay
entry base date (PEBD) be adjusted accordingly to 19 May 2002.

2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Boyd, Spooner and Swarens,
reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 21 July
2011, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective
action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of
record. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
the enclosures, naval records, and applicable statutes, ‘regulations
and policies.

3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining
to Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice, finds as follows:

a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all
administrative remedies available under existing law and regulations
within the Department of the Navy.

b. In enclosure (2), the Navy Personnel Command office with
cognizance over the subject matter of Petitioner’s case has commented
to the effect the request has merit and warrants favorable action.
CONCLUSION:

Upon review and consideration of alli the evidence of record, and
especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board finds
the existence of an error and injustice warranting the following
corrective action.

RECOMMENDATION :

a. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected, where
appropriate, to show she accepted her commission in the Navy Reserve
on 1 October 2010, rather than 22 November 2010.

b. That her anniversary date and PEBD be adjusted accordingly.

c. That any material or entries inconsistent with the Board's
recommendation be corrected, removed or completely expunged from
Petitioner's record and that no such entries or material be added
to the record in the future.

d. That a copy of this Report of Proceedings be filed at an
appropriate location in Petitioner's naval record, and that another
copy of this report be returned to this Board, together with any
material directed to be removed from Petitioner's record, for
retention in a confidential file maintained for such purpose.

4, Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the Board
for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations,
Section 723.6(c)}) it is certified that a quorum was present at the
Board's review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true
and complete record of the Board's proceedings in the above entitled
matter.

pat CC Crates

ROBERT D. Z4SALMAN JONATHAN S&S. RUSKIN
Recorder Acting Recorder

5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6 (e)
of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records
(32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(e)) and having assured
compliance with its provisions, it is hereby announced that the
foregoing corrective action, taken under the authority of reference
(a), has been approved by the Board on behalf of the Secretary of

the Navy.
0) 5
WW. Deanttelte
Executive Dir

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 01493-11

    Original file (01493-11.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference {a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show she accepted her commission in the Navy Reserve on 19 August 2010, rather than 9 September 2010; and that her pay entry base date (PEBD) be adjusted accordingly to 22 May 2009. CONCLUSION: Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of enclosure...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 12675-10

    Original file (12675-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show the lineal position, date of rank, and effective date in the grade of lieutenant colonel Petitioner would have been assigned had she been selected for promotion to that grade by the Fiscal Year (FY) 2010 Lieutenant Colonel Selection Board, rather than the FY 2011 Lieutenant...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 10087-10

    Original file (10087-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference {a}, Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show she accepted her commission. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Chapman, Dunn and Ivins, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 13 January 2011, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 01876-11

    Original file (01876-11.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board, consisting of Messrs. Boyd, Spooner and Swarens, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 21 July 2011, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected, where appropriate, to show the date of rank on her commission as a lieutenant, Medical Corps, Navy Reserve as 30 May 2003, rather than 30 May 2004. . c. That any material or...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 13012-10

    Original file (13012-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show the date of rank and effective date of her promotion to lieutenant as 1 June 2010, rather than 1 October 2010. The Board, consisting of Messrs. W. Hicks, Spooner and Storz;, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 21 January 2011, and pursuant to its regulations,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 06431-11

    Original file (06431-11.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    06431-11 19 August 2011 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: a, REVIEW OF NAVAL’ RECORD Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. The Board, consisting of Messrs. W. Hicks, Spooner and Swarens, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 18 August 2011, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. That any material or entries inconsistent with the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 08943-10

    Original file (08943-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    08943-10 14 December 2010 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records TOs Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ret: (ay 10 U.8.0. reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 9 December 2010, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. That any material or entries inconsistent with the Board's recommendation be corrected, removed or completely expunged...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 05545 12

    Original file (05545 12.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to reflect at least three years of entry grade credit (EGC) for his Doctor of Philosophy degree. The Board, consisting of Ms. Aldrich and Messrs. Chapman and Genteman, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 12 October 2012, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 13191-10

    Original file (13191-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed written application, enclosure (1), with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)") entry dated 20 May 2010 and his rebuttal dated 24 May 2010, copies of which are at Tab A. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Dixit, McBride and Vogt, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 09556-09

    Original file (09556-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, - hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show she accepted her commission in the Navy Reserve without a break in service. ‘The Board, consisting of Ms. LeBlanc and Messrs. Grover and McBride, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 7 January 2010, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective...